Revision as of 22:19, 27 April 2009 editEnd of yarn (talk | contribs)26 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit |
Revision as of 20:01, 29 April 2009 edit undoEnd of yarn (talk | contribs)26 edits ←Replaced content with '200 px'Next edit → |
Line 1: |
Line 1: |
|
] |
|
] |
|
#Is it '''reasonably well written'''? |
|
|
#:A. Prose quality: Very well written, terse {{GAList/check|y}} |
|
|
#:: {{#if:||}} |
|
|
#:B. ] compliance: No major issues that go against conventions {{GAList/check|y}} |
|
|
#:: {{#if:||}} |
|
|
#Is it '''factually accurate''' and ''']'''? |
|
|
#:A. References to sources: Yes, excellently sourced with very reliable sources {{GAList/check|y}} |
|
|
#:: {{#if:||}} |
|
|
#:B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary: Yes {{GAList/check|y}} |
|
|
#:: {{#if:||}} |
|
|
#:C. ]: Yes; all claims are thoroughly cited {{GAList/check|y}} |
|
|
#:: {{#if:||}} |
|
|
#Is it '''broad in its coverage'''? |
|
|
#:A. Major aspects: Yes, covers all parts of the issue (i would know because this is my area of specialty) {{GAList/check|y}} |
|
|
#:: {{#if:||}} |
|
|
#:B. Focused: Yes {{GAList/check|y}} |
|
|
#:: {{#if:||}} |
|
|
#Is it ''']'''? |
|
|
#:Fair representation without bias: Not really a problem in this type of article {{GAList/check|y}} |
|
|
#:: {{#if:||}} |
|
|
#Is it '''stable'''? |
|
|
#: No edit wars, etc: Yes {{GAList/check|y}} |
|
|
#:: {{#if:||}} |
|
|
#Does it '''contain ]''' to illustrate the topic? |
|
|
#:A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have ]: {{GAList/check|y}} |
|
|
#:: {{#if:||}} |
|
|
#:B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with ]: Well illustrated {{GAList/check|y}} |
|
|
#:: {{#if:||}} |
|
|
#'''Overall''': |
|
|
#:Pass or Fail: PASS {{GAList/check|y}} |
|
|
#:: {{#if:||}} |
|