Misplaced Pages

User talk:Karelin7: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from[REDACTED] with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 02:04, 17 May 2009 editRatel (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users12,985 edits Notice: Conflict of Interest on David Copperfield. (TW)← Previous edit Revision as of 09:36, 17 May 2009 edit undoAmicaveritas (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users505 editsNo edit summaryNext edit →
Line 79: Line 79:


For information on how to contribute to Misplaced Pages when you have conflict of interest, please see ]. For more details about what, exactly, constitutes a conflict of interest, please see ]. {{#if:|{{{2}}}|Thank you.}}]{{Do not delete}}<!-- Template:uw-coi --> ''Your intimate knowledge of the lawsuit (Viva v Copperfield) and ] profile bespeaks a COI.'' ] 02:04, 17 May 2009 (UTC) For information on how to contribute to Misplaced Pages when you have conflict of interest, please see ]. For more details about what, exactly, constitutes a conflict of interest, please see ]. {{#if:|{{{2}}}|Thank you.}}]{{Do not delete}}<!-- Template:uw-coi --> ''Your intimate knowledge of the lawsuit (Viva v Copperfield) and ] profile bespeaks a COI.'' ] 02:04, 17 May 2009 (UTC)

: I do not see this edit warring on the part Ratel. He is an established editor making edits in good faith. While it's clear you have concerns please refrain from making these comments about other editors, it's taken as an assumption of bad faith. It is easy to make this mistake when you are new here if you feel strongly about something you consider important - I did. I think we should all assume the article and concerns are proposed in good faith and discuss them. (Ratel, please give Karelin the benefit of the doubt with regards to COI). Karelin if you have COI please declare it now, this does not preculde you from having valide concerns, but it does mean they have to be addressed carefully.

As this is a biography of the living I would urge caution and suggest that temporarily debated content is removed pending debate and consensus and no further edits on this are made to the article until is reached. Does this seem reasonable? ] (]) 09:36, 17 May 2009 (UTC)

Revision as of 09:36, 17 May 2009

Hello, Karelin7! Welcome to Misplaced Pages! We're so glad you're here! If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you would like to play around with your new Wiki skills, the sandbox is for you. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! — Mikhailov Kusserow (talk) 02:41, 14 May 2009 (UTC)
Getting started
Getting help
Policies and guidelines
The community
Writing articles
Miscellaneous

David Copperfield

"Tendentious allegations of plaintiffs' are still reportable in the encyclopedia if they can be sourced. ► RATEL ◄ 01:40, 17 May 2009 (UTC)

May 2009

If you have a close connection to some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article David Copperfield, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Misplaced Pages's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred from the tone of the edit and the proximity of the editor to the subject, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:

  1. editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
  2. participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors; and
  3. linking to the Misplaced Pages article or website of your organization in other articles (see Misplaced Pages:Spam).

Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Misplaced Pages when you have conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. For more details about what, exactly, constitutes a conflict of interest, please see our conflict of interest guidelines. Thank you.Template:Do not delete Your intimate knowledge of the lawsuit (Viva v Copperfield) and WP:SPA profile bespeaks a COI. ► RATEL ◄ 02:04, 17 May 2009 (UTC)

I do not see this edit warring on the part Ratel. He is an established editor making edits in good faith. While it's clear you have concerns please refrain from making these comments about other editors, it's taken as an assumption of bad faith. It is easy to make this mistake when you are new here if you feel strongly about something you consider important - I did. I think we should all assume the article and concerns are proposed in good faith and discuss them. (Ratel, please give Karelin the benefit of the doubt with regards to COI). Karelin if you have COI please declare it now, this does not preculde you from having valide concerns, but it does mean they have to be addressed carefully.

As this is a biography of the living I would urge caution and suggest that temporarily debated content is removed pending debate and consensus and no further edits on this are made to the article until is reached. Does this seem reasonable? Amicaveritas (talk) 09:36, 17 May 2009 (UTC)

Category:
User talk:Karelin7: Difference between revisions Add topic