| Revision as of 06:23, 19 May 2009 editCunard (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users41,190 edits →List of team riders: re← Previous edit | Revision as of 15:39, 19 May 2009 edit undo78.105.206.251 (talk)No edit summaryNext edit → | ||
| Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
| ::::See ] for more information on sourcing. I've removed the unencyclopedic list again. Please stop re-adding it. ] (]) 06:23, 19 May 2009 (UTC) | ::::See ] for more information on sourcing. I've removed the unencyclopedic list again. Please stop re-adding it. ] (]) 06:23, 19 May 2009 (UTC) | ||
| Right because you know how to do it why dont you add it just the pro and am team because that is useful information that people may want to know i understand that the other list was too long now but just add the shorter one and reference it etc. as you care so much about this page make it look the part! | |||
Revision as of 15:39, 19 May 2009
 | This article was nominated for deletion on 23 January 2009. The result of the discussion was keep. |
Yes, I know it's an ad. :) The user requested that it be restored and frankly, I may take a whack at fixing this myself. Sounds interesting. I have to log off for the time being. --PMDrive1061 (talk) 20:41, 12 January 2009 (UTC)
Fixed it, but boy, that corporate website is hard as heck to follow. Too many weasel words, not enough fact. I'm not even sure where the company is based. --PMDrive1061 (talk) 21:26, 12 January 2009 (UTC)
List of team riders
This list doesn't belong in this article, so I've removed it. Please don't re-add it. Cunard (talk) 23:41, 25 April 2009 (UTC)
Why not though it is correct information —Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.105.206.251 (talk) 20:55, 8 May 2009 (UTC)
- The edit is inappropriate because Misplaced Pages is not a directory nor an indiscriminate collection of information. Cunard (talk) 21:18, 8 May 2009 (UTC)
then why does it have about element stores and who they sponsor —Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.105.206.251 (talk • contribs) 17:28, 14 May 2009 (UTC)
- That's because the information is sourced and is not an indiscriminate collection of information. Cunard (talk) 22:09, 14 May 2009 (UTC)
- but i dont know how to source it —Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.105.206.251 (talk) 13:40, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
- See Misplaced Pages:Citing sources for more information on sourcing. I've removed the unencyclopedic list again. Please stop re-adding it. Cunard (talk) 06:23, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
Right because you know how to do it why dont you add it just the pro and am team because that is useful information that people may want to know i understand that the other list was too long now but just add the shorter one and reference it etc. as you care so much about this page make it look the part!