User talk:Marcopronto: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively ← Previous edit Next edit →Content deleted Content addedVisual WikitextInline

Revision as of 21:24, 21 May 2009 editMarcopronto (talk \| contribs)27 edits ←Replaced content with 'So am I allowed to edit now or are you still going to be tight as shit? ~~~~'← Previous edit		Revision as of 21:25, 21 May 2009 edit undoKrano (talk \| contribs)Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers16,241 editsm Reverted edits by Marcopronto (talk) to last version by TravisTXNext edit →
Line 1:		Line 1:
			== May 2009 ==
	So am I allowed to edit now or are you still going to be tight as shit?
			] Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles{{#if:Rihanna discography\|, as you did to ]}}. Your edits appear to be ] and have been ]. If you believe the information you added was correct, please ] or discuss the changes on the article's ] before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the ]. {{#if:\|{{{2}}}\|Thank you.}}<!-- Template:uw-error2 --> ] 17:08, 17 May 2009 (UTC)
	] (]) 21:24, 21 May 2009 (UTC)

			] Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with <span class="plainlinks"></span> to ]. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. <!-- Template:uw-huggle3 --> ]] ] 17:58, 17 May 2009 (UTC)

			] This is the '''last warning''' you will receive for your disruptive edits{{#if:User talk:Blurpeace\|, such as those you made to ]}}. If you ] Misplaced Pages again, you '''will''' be ]. <!-- Template:uw-vandalism4 --> <font face="comic sans ms">''']]''' <sub>] · ]</sub></font> 18:02, 17 May 2009 (UTC)
			<div class="user-block"> ] You have been {{#ifeq:\|yes\|'''] indefinitely'''\|{{#if:\|''']''' for a period of '''{{{time}}}'''\|'''temporarily ]'''}}}} from editing in accordance with ] for persistent ]. {{#ifeq:\|yes\|\|Once the block has expired, you are welcome to ].}} If you believe this block is unjustified, you may ] by adding the text <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "tlx" argument. -->{{tlx\|unblock\|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our ] first. {{#if:yes\|<font color="darkorange">]</font><b><font color="midnightblue"><big>]</big></font></b><font color="red">]</font> 18:19, 17 May 2009 (UTC)}}</div>{{#ifeq:\|yes\|]}}</div><!-- Template:uw-vblock -->

			{{unblock reviewed\|1=I do not see why I was blocked. I apologised to someone, then next thing I know I've been blocked. Absolutely ridiculous.\|decline=As you should be able to see from the above information that I restored, you have been blocked for ]. I suppose that your edit to ] ''might'' be described as an apology, however the rest of your edits today have been vandalism and/or ] . Consider yourself lucky — many administrators would not have been so lenient as to give you such a short block. Declined. —]] 19:39, 17 May 2009 (UTC)}}

Revision as of 21:25, 21 May 2009

May 2009

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Rihanna discography. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Amalthea 17:08, 17 May 2009 (UTC)

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to User talk:Amalthea. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. _peace ☮ 17:58, 17 May 2009 (UTC)

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits, such as those you made to User talk:Blurpeace. If you vandalize Misplaced Pages again, you will be blocked from editing. Dylan 620 _{Efforts · Toolbox} 18:02, 17 May 2009 (UTC)

You have been temporarily blocked from editing in accordance with Misplaced Pages's blocking policy for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. TNXMan 18:19, 17 May 2009 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Marcopronto (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I do not see why I was blocked. I apologised to someone, then next thing I know I've been blocked. Absolutely ridiculous.

Decline reason:

As you should be able to see from the above information that I restored, you have been blocked for vandalism. I suppose that your edit to User talk:Dylan620 might be described as an apology, however the rest of your edits today have been vandalism and/or attacks . Consider yourself lucky — many administrators would not have been so lenient as to give you such a short block. Declined. —Travis 19:39, 17 May 2009 (UTC)

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.