Misplaced Pages

:Articles for deletion/SALIN: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from[REDACTED] with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →
Revision as of 09:30, 5 June 2009 editIronholds (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers79,705 edits message← Previous edit Revision as of 10:41, 5 June 2009 edit undoRedvers (talk | contribs)29,889 editsm Protected Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/SALIN: Edit warring / Content dispute ( (expires 10:41, 8 June 2009 (UTC)) (expires 10:41, 8 June 2009 (UTC)))Next edit →
(No difference)

Revision as of 10:41, 5 June 2009

SALIN

  • Note: IP "votes" are automatically discounted. If you have been asked to come here by somebody or you are "voting" multiple times, please read the policies on meatpuppetry and sockpuppetry. If you are an unvinvolved IP, please feel free to create an account.
SALIN (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

no assertion of notability; fails WP:ORG Ironholds (talk) 01:05, 23 May 2009 (UTC)


Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:00, 30 May 2009 (UTC)
  • Delete Insignificant organization, and minor mentions like that do not add up to notability. That an group is listed among related or allied groups by a national notable organization does not make the group notable. That it competes with a subchapter of a national group does not help either--far from it, it shows the local and non-notable status--especially given the utterly trivial nature of what is said about it--groups that finance themselves from snack sales at meetings are not likely to be notable. That its cofounder talk about it in an article he wrote is the definition of non-independent source, and the reason why we have that rule. But this is all as expected, state level professional organizations almost always are non-notable. My colleagues above have a good deal to learn about WP standards. DGG (talk) 23:55, 3 June 2009 (UTC)
  • Keep To DGG: According to Wiki's own guidelines, "Notable means "worthy of being noted" or "attracting notice." It is not synonymous with "fame" or "importance." " SALIN IS a significant organisation for South Australian LIS for what it DOES, not how much money it makes (BTW, what is YOUR definition of a "not for profit" organisation?!). It does not 'compete' with the subchapter of the national group, but rather supports it. Many of the SALIN committee members have used SALIN as a launching pad to serve on committees of that national group. Many of the SALIN members have taken out membership of that national group - this hardly supports your claim of competition. Now, as for what SALIN does: it supports new entrants to the LIS field by offering a supportive environment in which they can learn how to complete job applications in the LIS field; ofers networking opportunities in a non-threatening environment and other professionl development opportunities. It might not be rocket science, but it is an important stepping stone for many people who are new to LIS in South Australia, giving them confidence in their abilities and knowledge prior to making the move to serve on ALIA committees (our national group). Many notable South Australian librarians and information professionals have come through the ranks of SALIN - attending events first of all, and then serving on the committee. Ask any Librarian or Information professional in South Australia if they have heard of SALIN and I am sure you will get a positive response. That's not what I would regard as "not notable." Minnametsa (talk) 04:25, 4 June 2009 (UTC) This template must be substituted.
  • Comment to Narson Did you consider that perhaps many of the members and supporters of SALIN work at the same institution, which just happens to be one of the biggest libraries in the state?? This would account for the same IP addresses, and further gives weight to the significance of this organisation in SA. These people are busy professionals who hardly have the time (or the inclination, need etc.) to canvass support for an organisation that they already believe in just because some small-time[REDACTED] editor decides to flex his/her muscles. Minnametsa (talk) 04:30, 4 June 2009 (UTC) This template must be substituted.
    Read WP:MEATPUPPET. Canvassing seems to be exactly what they're doing. I'm going to emphasise again: Organisations like this must pass the notability guidelines at WP:ORG. No matter how many times you spout "ask your nearest librarian, he'll know what it is! See? It's notable!" it means squat if the subject matter fails WP:ORG. Ironholds (talk) 09:27, 5 June 2009 (UTC)
  • Comment I've just struck out the duplicate keep votes from an IP address (I don't believe that IP's votes generally count in AfDs anyway) and tagged User:Minnametsa as a SPA. I agree with Narson's comment about something dodgy going on here, though I wouldn't be surprised if it was just a single editor (hence the same IP being used alongside a SPA). Nick-D (talk) 11:37, 4 June 2009 (UTC)
Categories:
Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/SALIN: Difference between revisions Add topic