| Revision as of 20:08, 5 June 2009 editAllstarecho (talk | contribs)Rollbackers41,096 edits Undid revision 294639933 by Damiens.rf (talk) Seriously, stop edit warring on my talk page.← Previous edit | Revision as of 20:26, 5 June 2009 edit undoFrank (talk | contribs)Administrators19,998 edits Reverting; if the inappropriate commons image or a similar message is placed again, this page will be protectedNext edit → | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| == What??? == | |||
| {{imbox | |||
| | type = speedy | |||
| What's going on? ]]] 03:37, 5 June 2009 (UTC) | |||
| | text = '''This user has retired'''<br /><br />'''-''' ]<span class="Unicode" style="color:#FF72E3;">▼</span>'''<sup>]</sup>''' <sub>'''] @'''</sub> 03:27, 5 June 2009 (UTC) | |||
| *You can find one of the relevant discussions ]. ''']''''']'' 04:16, 5 June 2009 (UTC) | |||
| | textstyle = color: red; font-size: 25px; | |||
| ::Thanks, I found it, and I've now read through what's there. :/ ]]] 04:19, 5 June 2009 (UTC) | |||
| | image = ] | |||
| }} | |||
| ==Hello== | |||
| Sorry to see you go, Dude. You are one of the better editors here on Misplaced Pages. Good luck in whatever you choose to do off-wiki :) Take Care...<small style="border:1px solid #990000;padding:1px;">] • ] • 06:06, 5 June 2009 (UTC)</small> | |||
| What can I say? I value your input. ] (]) 07:56, 5 June 2009 (UTC) | |||
| == Block == | |||
| <div class="user-block"> ] You have been '''blocked indefinitely''' from editing in accordance with ] for {{#if:for turning your userpage into an attack page, and for uploading countless copyright violations, which will take months of effort to repair. You have said you have retired. If you wish to unretire, let me or any other administrator know and, if you promise not to copy-and-paste any more copyvio content, you'll be unblocked.|'''for turning your userpage into an attack page, and for uploading countless copyright violations, which will take months of effort to repair. You have said you have retired. If you wish to unretire, let me or any other administrator know and, if you promise not to copy-and-paste any more copyvio content, you'll be unblocked.'''|repeated ]}}. If you believe this block is unjustified you may ] by adding the text <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "tlx" argument. -->{{tlx|unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our ] first. {{#if:yes|– ] <sup>(])</sup> 10:59, 5 June 2009 (UTC)|}}</div><!-- Template:uw-block3 -->]. | |||
| :''"if you promise not to copy-and-paste any more copyvio content, you'll be unblocked"'' -- I hope this is boilerplate text and not serious. Based upon the damage this person has done with knowing and intentional copyright violations after being told multiple times to not do it anymore, I don't think a simple promise from him should be enough for an unblock. You know how that goes: "Fool me once, shame on you; fool me twice, shame on me." ] (]) 16:35, 5 June 2009 (UTC) | |||
| ::I think it was a ] statement to a long-time contributor. It's not outside the realm of possibility that Allstarecho would decide after a period of time to return and contribute within guidelines and policies. <small><span style="padding:2px;border:1px solid #000000">] {{!}} ]</span></small> 17:29, 5 June 2009 (UTC) | |||
| :::It's not, no, but if the actions taken by this user had gone through a normal dispute resolution process he'd no doubt be under some sort of sanctions and have some mandatory time out period. I am willing to believe he might be a useful contributor someday, but if he showed up in an hour and said he promises to stop doing what he knew he wasn't supposed to be doing for the past several years, it'd be reckless to let it go at that. All the assuming good faith in the world doesn't instantly erase all the bad faith he demonstrated for years. ] (]) 18:14, 5 June 2009 (UTC) | |||
| ::::Valid points. The key difference, I think, is that now, enough people are aware of it that such behavior would last only hours. <small><span style="padding:2px;border:1px solid #000000">] {{!}} ]</span></small> 18:30, 5 June 2009 (UTC) | |||
| == Cross-namespace redirects == | |||
| As much for others: | |||
| ] A tag has been placed on ], ], ], requesting that it be speedily deleted from Misplaced Pages. This has been done for the following reason: | |||
| <center>'''''cross-namespace redirect to indef blocked user & talk page. CSD:R2'''''</center> | |||
| Under the ], articles that do not meet basic Misplaced Pages criteria may be deleted at any time. Please ], and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add <code>{{tl|hangon}}</code> on the top of the page and leave a note on ] explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines. | |||
| For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria ], ], ], or ]. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this.<!-- Template:Nn-warn-reason --> '''] • '']'' ''' 15:46, 5 June 2009 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 20:26, 5 June 2009
What???
What's going on? LadyofShalott 03:37, 5 June 2009 (UTC)
- You can find one of the relevant discussions here. ZabMilenko 04:16, 5 June 2009 (UTC)
- Thanks, I found it, and I've now read through what's there. :/ LadyofShalott 04:19, 5 June 2009 (UTC)
Hello
Sorry to see you go, Dude. You are one of the better editors here on Misplaced Pages. Good luck in whatever you choose to do off-wiki :) Take Care...NeutralHomer • Talk • 06:06, 5 June 2009 (UTC)
What can I say? I value your input. Mish (talk) 07:56, 5 June 2009 (UTC)
Block
{{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. – Quadell 10:59, 5 June 2009 (UTC)
.
- "if you promise not to copy-and-paste any more copyvio content, you'll be unblocked" -- I hope this is boilerplate text and not serious. Based upon the damage this person has done with knowing and intentional copyright violations after being told multiple times to not do it anymore, I don't think a simple promise from him should be enough for an unblock. You know how that goes: "Fool me once, shame on you; fool me twice, shame on me." DreamGuy (talk) 16:35, 5 June 2009 (UTC)
- I think it was a good faith statement to a long-time contributor. It's not outside the realm of possibility that Allstarecho would decide after a period of time to return and contribute within guidelines and policies. Frank | talk 17:29, 5 June 2009 (UTC)
- It's not, no, but if the actions taken by this user had gone through a normal dispute resolution process he'd no doubt be under some sort of sanctions and have some mandatory time out period. I am willing to believe he might be a useful contributor someday, but if he showed up in an hour and said he promises to stop doing what he knew he wasn't supposed to be doing for the past several years, it'd be reckless to let it go at that. All the assuming good faith in the world doesn't instantly erase all the bad faith he demonstrated for years. DreamGuy (talk) 18:14, 5 June 2009 (UTC)
- Valid points. The key difference, I think, is that now, enough people are aware of it that such behavior would last only hours. Frank | talk 18:30, 5 June 2009 (UTC)
- It's not, no, but if the actions taken by this user had gone through a normal dispute resolution process he'd no doubt be under some sort of sanctions and have some mandatory time out period. I am willing to believe he might be a useful contributor someday, but if he showed up in an hour and said he promises to stop doing what he knew he wasn't supposed to be doing for the past several years, it'd be reckless to let it go at that. All the assuming good faith in the world doesn't instantly erase all the bad faith he demonstrated for years. DreamGuy (talk) 18:14, 5 June 2009 (UTC)
- I think it was a good faith statement to a long-time contributor. It's not outside the realm of possibility that Allstarecho would decide after a period of time to return and contribute within guidelines and policies. Frank | talk 17:29, 5 June 2009 (UTC)
Cross-namespace redirects
As much for others:
A tag has been placed on Misplaced Pages:ASTAR, Misplaced Pages:ASE, P:ASTAR, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Misplaced Pages. This has been done for the following reason:
Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Misplaced Pages criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page and leave a note on ] explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.
For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Athanasius • Quicumque vult 15:46, 5 June 2009 (UTC)
Category: