| Revision as of 19:32, 26 July 2009 editDarrenhusted (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Rollbackers24,047 edits →Housemates.: new section← Previous edit | Revision as of 13:19, 27 July 2009 edit undoMegaPedant (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users2,044 edits →Housemates.Next edit → | ||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
| Leave it, none of those wanted to delete the article have even made more than one edit. Leave it alone and in put your energies elsewhere, the first nine BB article need editing, give it a couple of months and nominate the BB5, 6, 7, 8, 9 and 10 housemate articles for deletion. Take the other article off the watchlist. The housemates need to be listed in the article in some way otherwise the summary makes no sense. ] (]) 19:32, 26 July 2009 (UTC) | Leave it, none of those wanted to delete the article have even made more than one edit. Leave it alone and in put your energies elsewhere, the first nine BB article need editing, give it a couple of months and nominate the BB5, 6, 7, 8, 9 and 10 housemate articles for deletion. Take the other article off the watchlist. The housemates need to be listed in the article in some way otherwise the summary makes no sense. ] (]) 19:32, 26 July 2009 (UTC) | ||
| :It is rather odd that so many "new" editors should turn up at the same time, don't you think? I despise underhand dealings, whoever the perpetrator. ] (]) 13:19, 27 July 2009 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 13:19, 27 July 2009
Confessions of a Teenage Martyr
| Please leave a new message. |
If we were both housemates...
...I'm sure we'd nominate each other every week. I'd still give you a hug though, if either of us were evicted! By that, I mean I genuinely value your contributions, despite frequently disagreeing with you. I often find you hard work but during your recent hiatus I feared the worst and, though I expressed no emotion at the time, I was delighted when you returned. I'm now off to sit in the gaol for a few hours as punishment for discussing nominations :) MegaPedant (talk) 14:04, 26 July 2009 (UTC)
Housemates.
Leave it, none of those wanted to delete the article have even made more than one edit. Leave it alone and in put your energies elsewhere, the first nine BB article need editing, give it a couple of months and nominate the BB5, 6, 7, 8, 9 and 10 housemate articles for deletion. Take the other article off the watchlist. The housemates need to be listed in the article in some way otherwise the summary makes no sense. Darrenhusted (talk) 19:32, 26 July 2009 (UTC)
- It is rather odd that so many "new" editors should turn up at the same time, don't you think? I despise underhand dealings, whoever the perpetrator. MegaPedant (talk) 13:19, 27 July 2009 (UTC)