Revision as of 16:09, 30 July 2009 editRadiopathy (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users18,609 edits Reverted to revision 304941478 by Radiopathy; rm trolling. (TW)← Previous edit | Revision as of 17:02, 30 July 2009 edit undoJ Milburn (talk | contribs)Administrators129,909 edits →User talk:PhilKnight: new sectionNext edit → | ||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== ] == | |||
I do not appreciate your comments on this talk page at all. I most certainly have not abused my admin powers (which admin power do you feel I have abused?) and my course of action was perfectly legitimate. There was also no great urgency for those images to be restored- as I said, if it was determined they were required, I would be happy to restore them myself. If you have an issue with my conduct, raise it with me- don't just tramp around making snide accusations and generally creating an atmosphere of badwill. ] (]) 17:02, 30 July 2009 (UTC) |
Revision as of 17:02, 30 July 2009
User talk:PhilKnight
I do not appreciate your comments on this talk page at all. I most certainly have not abused my admin powers (which admin power do you feel I have abused?) and my course of action was perfectly legitimate. There was also no great urgency for those images to be restored- as I said, if it was determined they were required, I would be happy to restore them myself. If you have an issue with my conduct, raise it with me- don't just tramp around making snide accusations and generally creating an atmosphere of badwill. J Milburn (talk) 17:02, 30 July 2009 (UTC)