Revision as of 05:07, 28 August 2009 editTimVickers (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users58,184 edits →Archaea: ed← Previous edit | Revision as of 05:16, 28 August 2009 edit undoXook1kai Choa6aur (talk | contribs)283 edits →ArchaeaNext edit → | ||
Line 83: | Line 83: | ||
::Here is a run-on sentence you created with : "Archaea have, in the past, been classed with ] as '']s'', this classification is outdated." Commas are not used to separate complete independent clauses. Either a conjunction or a semi-colon is needed. I did not reintroduce factual error, since there was no factual error. If you believe there is such an error, please present it on the ] page. --] (]) 00:30, 28 August 2009 (UTC) | ::Here is a run-on sentence you created with : "Archaea have, in the past, been classed with ] as '']s'', this classification is outdated." Commas are not used to separate complete independent clauses. Either a conjunction or a semi-colon is needed. I did not reintroduce factual error, since there was no factual error. If you believe there is such an error, please present it on the ] page. --] (]) 00:30, 28 August 2009 (UTC) | ||
:::Yes, unless you start to discuss the edits you wish to make to articles on talk pages and the sources that support these edits, you may soon be blocked from editing. ] (]) 05:07, 28 August 2009 (UTC) |
Revision as of 05:16, 28 August 2009
Welcome!
|
Use the talk page please
Hi, can you please try to explain your edits on the article talkpages? I am referring to your edits c on Genetic history of Europe, but looking through your contributions I think you are generally heading for trouble unless you learn to do this.--Andrew Lancaster (talk) 18:41, 24 August 2009 (UTC)
Archaea
Your edits have introduced multiple grammatical errors and removed information. Please note the policy WP:3R, which you are in danger of violating. --EncycloPetey (talk) 01:46, 27 August 2009 (UTC)
- Yes, perhaps you could discuss your changes on Talk:Archaea? Tim Vickers (talk) 02:16, 27 August 2009 (UTC)
- That reference (Garcia-Vallvé et. al.) does not discuss Archaeal taxonomy. The influence of HGT on classification is discussed in detail in Archaea#Current_classification. Tim Vickers (talk) 21:15, 27 August 2009 (UTC)
- Then show me one please. Do you realize that your edit reintroduced factual error? Xook1kai Choa6aur (talk)
- Here is a run-on sentence you created with this diff: "Archaea have, in the past, been classed with bacteria as prokaryotes, this classification is outdated." Commas are not used to separate complete independent clauses. Either a conjunction or a semi-colon is needed. I did not reintroduce factual error, since there was no factual error. If you believe there is such an error, please present it on the Talk:Archaea page. --EncycloPetey (talk) 00:30, 28 August 2009 (UTC)