User talk:GRBerry: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively ← Previous edit Next edit →Content deleted Content addedVisual WikitextInline

Revision as of 14:06, 11 October 2009 editMiszaBot III (talk \| contribs)597,462 editsm Archiving 3 thread(s) (older than 31d) to User talk:GRBerry/Archive 11.← Previous edit		Revision as of 22:20, 20 October 2009 edit undoDoriSmith (talk \| contribs)Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers23,691 edits →Articles for deletion/Jonathan Gleich (2nd nomination): new sectionNext edit →
Line 45:		Line 45:

	I realize that this was a long time ago, but in your to the ] article, in the edit summary you said,in part, "expand from ''Smithsonian'', April 2006, page 18." You did not put in a footnote giving the article's title and citation. I used the and looked at April 2006, but I did not find the article. Unfortunately, the electronic archive does not use page numbers. I was able to find another source that talked about the same Ecuadorian study. I assume, that at this point, your editing skills have improved, so that were you to make that same edit today, you would provide the full citation in a note. Thanks. --] (]) 17:03, 26 September 2009 (UTC)		I realize that this was a long time ago, but in your to the ] article, in the edit summary you said,in part, "expand from ''Smithsonian'', April 2006, page 18." You did not put in a footnote giving the article's title and citation. I used the and looked at April 2006, but I did not find the article. Unfortunately, the electronic archive does not use page numbers. I was able to find another source that talked about the same Ecuadorian study. I assume, that at this point, your editing skills have improved, so that were you to make that same edit today, you would provide the full citation in a note. Thanks. --] (]) 17:03, 26 September 2009 (UTC)

			== ] ==

			Hi! As someone who contributed to ] and/or ], I thought you might be interested in the discussion at ].

			<small>Note: this is going out to all registered editors with talk pages who commented on either page, not just to those on the Delete/Endorse or Keep/Overturn side.</small>

			Thank you. <span style='font:bold 1.0em "Apple Garamond","Adobe Garamond Pro",Garamond,serif;color:#369;'>] ❦ (] ❖ ] ❖ ]) ❦</span> 22:20, 20 October 2009 (UTC)

Revision as of 22:20, 20 October 2009

Template:WPChristianity sidebar • {{ChristianityWikiProject}} • Category:Unassessed-Class Christianity articles
Christianity Recognized Content • AFD results by nominator

I am also user GRBerry on Commons, Wikispecies, Meta, and (although I speak no German) de.Misplaced Pages. Messages intended for me on any of those projects may be left here, in which case I ask the poster to indicate which project they are talking about. GRBerry diff meta diff I've also signed up for single user login.

This talk page is automatically archived by User:MiszaBot III. Any sections older than 31 days are automatically archived to User talk:GRBerry/Archive 11. Sections without timestamps are not archived.

Email advice: When able to be active on Misplaced Pages, I am more likely to read this talk page than I am to read email, as the email goes to my work email. So please reserve email for items requiring 1) confidentiality, 2) the format (forwarding other emails), or 3) some other really good reason for using email. Also, to help it get through my spam filters and to my attention, have the email subject line begin with "Misplaced Pages". If at all possible, I will respond on Misplaced Pages, because I believe that transparency is important, and each user I email lessens my privacy. GRBerry

At this point I became an admin. Subsequent archives are by bot in the order conversations became stale rather than the order they were created.

Early in period I voluntarily resigned as an admin. I do not currently have access to the administrative tools.

New sections belong at the bottom, not here.

RSN thread

Could you please take another look at Misplaced Pages:Reliable_sources/Noticeboard#60_Minutes_and_the_Assassination_of_Werner_Erhard? Cirt (talk) 15:02, 16 September 2009 (UTC)

Dawn chorus

I realize that this was a long time ago, but in your 00:46, 23 August 2006 edit to the Dawn chorus (birds) article, in the edit summary you said,in part, "expand from Smithsonian, April 2006, page 18." You did not put in a footnote giving the article's title and citation. I used the Smithsonian Magazine archive and looked at April 2006, but I did not find the article. Unfortunately, the electronic archive does not use page numbers. I was able to find another source that talked about the same Ecuadorian study. I assume, that at this point, your editing skills have improved, so that were you to make that same edit today, you would provide the full citation in a note. Thanks. --Bejnar (talk) 17:03, 26 September 2009 (UTC)

Articles for deletion/Jonathan Gleich (2nd nomination)

Hi! As someone who contributed to Articles for deletion/Jonathan Gleich and/or the deletion review of that AFD, I thought you might be interested in the discussion at Articles for deletion/Jonathan Gleich (2nd nomination).

Note: this is going out to all registered editors with talk pages who commented on either page, not just to those on the Delete/Endorse or Keep/Overturn side.

Thank you. Dori ❦ (Talk ❖ Contribs ❖ Review) ❦ 22:20, 20 October 2009 (UTC)