| Revision as of 22:35, 16 October 2009 editDelicious carbuncle (talk | contribs)21,054 edits Shankbone and I make a great team!← Previous edit | Revision as of 23:50, 22 October 2009 edit undoTimotheus Canens (talk | contribs)Edit filter managers, Administrators38,438 editsm Fix.Next edit → | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| ⚫ | ===]=== | ||
| ⚫ | |||
| <div class="boilerplate metadata afd vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;"> | |||
| :''The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a ]). No further edits should be made to this page.'' | |||
| <!--Template:Afd top | |||
| Note: If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to re-nominate an article for deletion, you must manually edit the AfD nomination links in order to create a new discussion page using the name format of ]. When you create the new discussion page, please provide a link to this old discussion in your nomination. --> | |||
| ⚫ | The result was '''Withdrawn by nominator''' - I think I Googled "Ping Pong Player" instead of "Ping Pong Playa". ] (]) 22:35, 16 October 2009 (UTC) | ||
| ⚫ | ===]=== | ||
| :{{la|Ping Pong Playa}} – <includeonly>(])</includeonly><noinclude>(])</noinclude> | :{{la|Ping Pong Playa}} – <includeonly>(])</includeonly><noinclude>(])</noinclude> | ||
| :({{findsources|Ping Pong Playa}}) | :({{findsources|Ping Pong Playa}}) | ||
| Unremarkable film (see ]). I have removed a long plot summary which was a copyright violation cut-and-pasted from the official site. Since it is possible that this film may be notable, I'm putting the remaining stub up for deletion rather than requesting speedy deletion as copyvio. ] (]) 17:47, 16 October 2009 (UTC) | Unremarkable film (see ]). I have removed a long plot summary which was a copyright violation cut-and-pasted from the official site. Since it is possible that this film may be notable, I'm putting the remaining stub up for deletion rather than requesting speedy deletion as copyvio. ] (]) 17:47, 16 October 2009 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Obvious keep''' Multiple reviews in mainstream, reliable sources, more than meeting ]. See. Took all of five seconds to find those sources on Google. --<font color="navy" size="2" face="comic sans ms">>David</font> ''']''' 20:52, 16 October 2009 (UTC) | *'''Obvious keep''' Multiple reviews in mainstream, reliable sources, more than meeting ]. See. Took all of five seconds to find those sources on Google. --<font color="navy" size="2" face="comic sans ms">>David</font> ''']''' 20:52, 16 October 2009 (UTC) | ||
| :''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a ]). No further edits should be made to this page. <!--Template:Afd bottom--></div> | |||
| {{afd bottom}} | |||
Revision as of 23:50, 22 October 2009
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Withdrawn by nominator - I think I Googled "Ping Pong Player" instead of "Ping Pong Playa". Delicious carbuncle (talk) 22:35, 16 October 2009 (UTC)
Ping Pong Playa
- Ping Pong Playa (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Unremarkable film (see WP:NOTABILITY). I have removed a long plot summary which was a copyright violation cut-and-pasted from the official site. Since it is possible that this film may be notable, I'm putting the remaining stub up for deletion rather than requesting speedy deletion as copyvio. Delicious carbuncle (talk) 17:47, 16 October 2009 (UTC)
- Obvious keep Multiple reviews in mainstream, reliable sources, more than meeting Misplaced Pages:Notability (films). See. Took all of five seconds to find those sources on Google. -->David Shankbone 20:52, 16 October 2009 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.