Misplaced Pages

Revision as of 06:14, 9 December 2009

Sock editing - there's no sock editing here whatsoever

This account appears to be a sockpuppet of User:Hassaan19. If you continue to edit on the articles that are of interest to Hassaan19, you will most likely be indef blocked. If you are actually not a sock, consider being willing to explain more about your background. It doesn't yet seem worthwhile to file at WP:Sockpuppet investigations for an account with only 22 edits, but one of your edits was a repeat of the very thing that Hassaan19 was recently blocked for. EdJohnston (talk) 17:55, 7 December 2009 (UTC)

NO WAY AM I A "SOCK-PUPPET." You've got this completely wrong ~ please take a look at the IP adresses of me and the other user, Hassaan19. Really I feel bad that you've accused me of something I've not done...really please get your facts right and check my IP address. I'm outraged that you've made this obscene, false accusation. Before you say things like this. check and get your facts right. Really I'm MAD that you're saying this........ If you block me this is abuse of power an bullying, pure and simple, as I'm completely innocent. I'm a relatively new user, and want to make a formal complaint about you about this, I'm feeling so angry that you've made the OUTRAGOUS AND FALSE ~ COMPLETELY AND UTTERLY FALSE AND DEFAMATORY,... yes DEFAMATORY, horrible accusation, I want to take this to a higher level and as you're more experienced than me please help me you... in future THINK and CHECK before you make FALSE accusation against relatively new Misplaced Pages members... no wonder people feel unwelcome here and leave... really it's people like you who bark and LIE - pure and simple, this is a big black like.... PLEASE INVESTIGATE ME TO FIND OUT THE TRUTH, WHICH IS I'M NOT A "SOCK-PUPPET." ..........THIS IS AN OUTRAGE! :-@ ...oh and let me sign this reply, I forgot... Whitebrightlight (talk) 22:03, 7 December 2009 (UTC)

Do you know User:Hassaan19? How did you get the idea of going to his user page to update the list of articles he had worked on during the period while Hassaan19 was blocked? Since Hassaan19 has already been warned for double-voting during AfDs using a sock, it would not come as a complete surprise that he has another one. EdJohnston (talk) 22:11, 7 December 2009 (UTC)

I edited his page because I changed one of the X-Factor finalist's page which he created, from a redirect to a article, because the Misplaced Pages rule is the top three, in other words the X-Factor finalist's in this case, warrant a page on Misplaced Pages. So I noticed that Hassaan19 had made the page and listed the pages he's made on his talk page, so I moved it to the right place, since the page is no longer a redirect but a full page, due to the change in circumstances of this particular X-Factor contestant - the change being he's a finalist - this finalists are now known which means the Misplaced Pages criteria is now passed... so I sorted out his list because the page isn't a redirect anymore. Whitebrightlight (talk) 22:23, 7 December 2009 (UTC)

I notice thathere you talk about Haasaan19 in the first person. I42 (talk) 23:01, 7 December 2009 (UTC)

^ what is your point here. i\'ve told you i\'m a completely different person to hassaan19, and i have follower the[REDACTED] policy of making a page for the person in the top three in a music contest. i\'m right here so i take insinuations like you\'re making as personally offensive so please stop and leave me alone.

i fail to see your point too, since this is a perfectly correct and normal edit i\'ve made and reason given. the person who reverted is in the wrong, not me. i feel like i\'m being persecuted here, i\'m not saying that you are actively persecuting me, what i\'m saying is[REDACTED] is making me feel threatened and unwelcome, so can a senior admin editor help me out here please. i just want to make sure this is read and the admin can see how bad i\'m feeling because of this, what from my standpoint feels like a attack on me from a clique of more experienced wikipedians. again, i\'m not saying this is an attack because i don\'t know, what i\'m saying is it feels threatening to me. :(

Only Warning

Not withstanding the allegations of socking above, edit summaries likes this are rude, uncivli and pretty much personal attacks - particularly when you accuse other editors of being "bullies" just because you did not get the position you wanted on an article. Please desist or I'll block this account. Pedro :  Chat  22:41, 7 December 2009 (UTC)

^ it had nothing to do with me \"not get the position you wanted on an article\" ~ i was falsely accused of being a sock puppet, and i feel threatened and harassed by user \"142\" now.

how dare you! i\'ve been falsely accused of being a sock puppet. please check my ip using check user, or whatever the function is called. so you\'re threatening to block me, due to me defending myself against false accusations. no wonder people are leaving wikipedia. please can someone help me out here, i want to talk to a more senior admin who will check my ip and prove i\'m innocent here. please can someone show this to a senior administrator who has the power to check ip addresses. also please stop threatening to block me, since the reply you\'re highlighting is my response to false accusations. also 142 i told you before to stop talking to me because of your negative attitude towards me, it now seems that you\'re actively trying to get me blocked. note i siad this is how it seems, i don\'t know that you\'re trying to get me blocked so i\'m not accusing you of this or anything, i\'m just saying how it seems from my perspective. i would like some other admin who\'s not related to this, to look at what had been happening to me impartially. thanks. if anyone can tell me how i can get another senoir admin to look at this, please tell me, because i\'m new.

Your complaint on my talk page

Hi there. I am confused about the note you left on my talk page. I am presuming it is referring to the comment that I left at User talk:Hassaan19] as this is the only McElderry related warning I have issued. Could you therefore detail why you complain about it in the first person. Please supply a prompt and convincing explanation otherwise the only conclusion that can be drawn is that you are operating multiple accounts and forgot which one you were logged in to. Nancy 11:10, 8 December 2009 (UTC)

Hello. This comment I left wasn't related to any warnings issued to another user. It was about my single revert I made to the Joe McElderry page, when he became a top three finalist on The X-Factor TV-show. It had nothing whatsoever to do with the user Hassaan19 or any of his messages. When it had to do with was the fact that it should have been permissible for there to be a Joe McElderry page by this point, for the reason I mentioned. My message on your talk page isn't directly complaining about you, it's generally complaining about this issue, so if it seemed like a personal issue to you this wasn't my intention. I'm not sure what you're talking about when you are speaking about a message in the first person. Also as I've said, please get a check of my IP address and my entire history of IP address used, because you can prove categorically that I'm not Hasaan19. Also I'm not guilty until proven innocent. I would like to re-iterate; since I'm entirely innocent, PLEASE CHECK IM IP ADDRESS and THiS WILL PROVE ME INNOCENT - I'm not shouting at you here I just want this the be noticed that I have nothing to hide and my innocence can be proven by an investigation my my IP address and Hassaan19's IP address. So I would say in response to you, please give a convincing response why you won't get my IP address history fully investigated, ... to quote you; "otherwise the only conclusion that can be drawn is that," you want to avoid getting the evidence that will prove me to be completely innocent. I'm not accusing you of this or anything - I know I've been falsely accused of being a sock-puppet, but I won't EVER lower myself to the level of make false, unsubstantiated accusations. I'm not guilty until proven innocent either, because allowing this could lead to any inexperienced user being falsely accused by more experienced users or administrators, and in a witch-hunt like way, summarily "convicted without trial" of being a sock-puppet ~ is a sock-puppet Misplaced Pages's version of a witch? I hope I've made my point, also it isn't for me to "make it convincing" that I'm innocent, it's for "you" (and no I'm not taking to a specific user here, I'm simply addressing the accusers,) to provide solid evidence, which in this case is proof that me and Hassaan19 are the same person by showing that we're using the same IP addresses, because, as I know that I'm 100% innocent, I know that it will prove the contrary, that me and Hassaan19 are completely different users. So please, please, PLEASE, let someone who has the facility to do so, use CheckUser on me. I know I'm innocent so no proper investigation will prove me guilty. So please (a neutral person) go ahead - I'd like a NEUTRAL admin with CheckUser powers to FULLY INVESTIGATE ME from every angle in every way. I'm an innocent man and feel sad that Misplaced Pages experienced members SEEM to have ganged up on me this was - no I'm not saying you have, I'm NOT accusing you of ganging up on me, because I don't have any evidence, and this is the way I always behave, because it's the right and honourable way to behave - I don't make accusations unless I have very strong evidence - beyond reasonable doubt AT LEAST. before I will accuse. And I tend not to accuse generally anyway. Please don't "hang an innocent man." PLEASE "CHECKUSER" ME and THIS WILL PROVE that it's IMPOSSIBLE or extremely, EXTREMELY UNLIKELY for me to be a sock puppet. Whitebrightlight (talk) 06:14, 9 December 2009 (UTC)