| Revision as of 10:54, 18 January 2010 editElen of the Roads (talk | contribs)16,638 edits →"Wiki project" Modern Talking: new section← Previous edit | Revision as of 15:31, 18 January 2010 edit undoMiszaBot III (talk | contribs)597,462 editsm Archiving 3 thread(s) (older than 2d) to User talk:MisterWiki/Archive 29.Next edit → | ||
| Line 23: | Line 23: | ||
| |}</div> | |}</div> | ||
| {{TOCright}} | {{TOCright}} | ||
| == New article about Modern Talking == | |||
| The ] of the ] article is full complete. Enjoy. --] (]) 19:54, 14 January 2010 (UTC) | |||
| == Thank you very much! == | |||
| Thanks for the holiday cheer! :D ''']''' <small><font color="#AA33FF">] • ]</font></small> 23:57, 14 January 2010 (UTC) | |||
| : :D --] <small>] ]</small> 23:58, 14 January 2010 (UTC) | |||
| == ] == | |||
| I may have missed it, but did you follow by bringing the project up at ] before moving it back into the Misplaced Pages namespace? --]]] 16:41, 15 January 2010 (UTC) | |||
| : I did: http://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:WikiProject_Council/Proposals/Modern_Talking --] <small>] ]</small> 16:51, 15 January 2010 (UTC) | |||
| ::I suppose I'm not all that familiar with the instructions, but they appear to suggest leaving it in userspace until there's at least 5-10 active editors interested. I only see 3 there...and I wouldn't exactly call 2 of them active. Oh well, I'm not going to move it back or anything. I would ask that you don't simply another project's shortcut by changing it to be a shortcut for your own project. (No need for talkback templates) --]]] 17:06, 15 January 2010 (UTC) | |||
| == Time for Acknowledgement == | == Time for Acknowledgement == | ||
| Line 122: | Line 107: | ||
| Just a quick reminder that the ] has begun. Please log any work you do at ]. Good luck! --]''''']''''' 02:01, 18 January 2010 (UTC) | Just a quick reminder that the ] has begun. Please log any work you do at ]. Good luck! --]''''']''''' 02:01, 18 January 2010 (UTC) | ||
| ==Fair use rationale for File:José Arraño Acevedo.jpg== | == Fair use rationale for File:José Arraño Acevedo.jpg == | ||
| ] | ] | ||
| Thanks for uploading or contributing to ''']'''. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under ] but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Misplaced Pages constitutes fair use. Please go to ] and edit it to include a ]. | Thanks for uploading or contributing to ''']'''. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under ] but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Misplaced Pages constitutes fair use. Please go to ] and edit it to include a ]. | ||
Revision as of 15:31, 18 January 2010
User:MisterWiki/Navbar User:MisterWiki/Chile User:MisterWiki/format User talk:Vanished user 24kwjf10h32h/Editnotice
| vn-1 | This editor's user page, talk page, or subpages have been vandalized 1 time. |
 Archives |
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 2 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III. |
| This is Vanished user 24kwjf10h32h's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments. |
|
 |
Please leave a new message. I answer posts on the same page. |
Time for Acknowledgement
Please review this warning and indicate your acceptance of it on WP:ANI ASAP. Thanks. (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 19:29, 15 January 2010 (UTC)
I've blocked you from editing for 24 hours owing to this edit. Gwen Gale (talk) 22:24, 15 January 2010 (UTC)
- OK, I agree with the block. I was a stupid. --MW talk contribs 22:28, 15 January 2010 (UTC)
- I think you're easily smart enough to keep anything like this from happening again. If it does, the next block will most likely be indefinite. Gwen Gale (talk) 22:32, 15 January 2010 (UTC)
- But can you leave the block in 1/2 day, not one. Please. --MW talk contribs 22:36, 15 January 2010 (UTC)
- You're welcome to post an {{unblock|reason}} tag. Gwen Gale (talk) 22:40, 15 January 2010 (UTC)
- But can you leave the block in 1/2 day, not one. Please. --MW talk contribs 22:36, 15 January 2010 (UTC)
- I think you're easily smart enough to keep anything like this from happening again. If it does, the next block will most likely be indefinite. Gwen Gale (talk) 22:32, 15 January 2010 (UTC)
Vanished user 24kwjf10h32h (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I hate to do this again, because of that redirect. At least make the duration shorter.
Decline reason:
I am declining your request for unblock because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that
- the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Misplaced Pages, or
- the block is no longer necessary because you
- understand what you have been blocked for,
- will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
- will make useful contributions instead.
Please read our guide to appealing blocks for more information. Beeblebrox (talk) 22:43, 15 January 2010 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Vanished user 24kwjf10h32h (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I acknowledge the controversy that caused that redirection, that should had never been created, in act of the idiotic things I talk with the other people. Also, it's not necessary for just 1 vandalism. I will not continue to disrupt. --MW talk contribs 22:48, 15 January 2010 (UTC)
Decline reason:
A timeout will remind you of the seriousness of not joking about using articles. You got a Get Out Of Jail Free card the last time around, you shouldn't expect to get any more. henrik•talk 22:55, 15 January 2010 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
After all that discussion Gwen, and all the agreement to indef at the next problem, you jump in and block for 24 hours? Sigh, why do I bother. Tan | 39 22:49, 15 January 2010 (UTC)
- As I told MisterWiki, if the next problem comes, the indef warning still stands. Gwen Gale (talk) 22:53, 15 January 2010 (UTC)
- Why indef? Why not a year? The infinity is too much time. --MW talk contribs 22:55, 15 January 2010 (UTC)
- Why not just 12 hours. :P --MW talk contribs 22:57, 15 January 2010 (UTC)
- Because Misplaced Pages is not a joke. If you are really asking for forgiveness, you'd take the "punishment". --ZooFari 23:03, 15 January 2010 (UTC)
- Then the "indef" warning should be revoked. I already have editing restrictions and that's enough. --MW talk contribs 23:05, 15 January 2010 (UTC)
- Far from it - any more crap from you and I'm gonna pull the trigger on that indefinite block, which I imagine will be a de facto ban from Misplaced Pages. I realize I'm probably poking the bear a bit here, but cut it out. Or, if your goal is to prove a point, go ahead and prove it and let's get this over with. Tan | 39 23:07, 15 January 2010 (UTC)
- Then the "indef" warning should be revoked. I already have editing restrictions and that's enough. --MW talk contribs 23:05, 15 January 2010 (UTC)
- Because Misplaced Pages is not a joke. If you are really asking for forgiveness, you'd take the "punishment". --ZooFari 23:03, 15 January 2010 (UTC)
- What I'm saying tho, Gwen, is that we had it under control. Decisions had already been made, the warning issued, the situation was relatively stable. Then you decided to jump into the situation and issue some sort of punishment for what already happened - and really, that's what it is, you aren't preventing anything if he's going to be indeffed at the next disruption anyway. I'm not going to revert this, but I want you to know I find this a very poor decision and quite honestly, you're stepping on toes here. Tan | 39 23:01, 15 January 2010 (UTC)
- He was taunting y'all. Two unblock requests have been declined, please feel free to lengthen the block to indef if need be. Gwen Gale (talk) 23:24, 15 January 2010 (UTC)
- If you can't do the time, don't do the crime. Look, perhaps something good will come out of this for you. Perhaps you'll learn something from this. But Misplaced Pages is not a game. You are either here to help build an encyclopedia or you should not be here at all. I learned that the hard way. Just take the advice of the others and back down. I doubt that you'll be unblocked this time.--Coldplay Expért 23:35, 15 January 2010 (UTC)
- The 144 articles I have created will tell you how do I want to help build an encyclopedia, Coldplay expert. Sometimes the admins doesn't think on the good intentions may I or another user have, that's unfair, because it makes them a specie of nazi. That can't continue. We are here to help, not to destroy this place. I know I disrupt sometimes, but tell me, didn't you disrupted sometimes to your mom or your teacher or whoever else?. Think on it. --MW talk contribs 00:19, 16 January 2010 (UTC)
- You are insulting administrators here after you have done something stupid. Please retract. --ZooFari 00:23, 16 January 2010 (UTC)
- Why would we wait for him to retract? He obviously just blew his very last super duper really this time chance.--Crossmr (talk) 00:24, 16 January 2010 (UTC)
- Sorry, there is no system where you can trade good contribs to excuse disruption. I'd agree with Gwen above, even after being blocked you're still playing games. I'd also support a much longer, lost in time block.--Crossmr (talk) 00:24, 16 January 2010 (UTC)
- Funny how everyone never capitalizes the last part of my name. And MW, there is no excuse for your actions. No policy states that bad behavior can be traded away based off of good contribs. Just take a look at Ottava's page.--Coldplay Expért 01:56, 16 January 2010 (UTC)
- You are insulting administrators here after you have done something stupid. Please retract. --ZooFari 00:23, 16 January 2010 (UTC)
- The 144 articles I have created will tell you how do I want to help build an encyclopedia, Coldplay expert. Sometimes the admins doesn't think on the good intentions may I or another user have, that's unfair, because it makes them a specie of nazi. That can't continue. We are here to help, not to destroy this place. I know I disrupt sometimes, but tell me, didn't you disrupted sometimes to your mom or your teacher or whoever else?. Think on it. --MW talk contribs 00:19, 16 January 2010 (UTC)
- If you can't do the time, don't do the crime. Look, perhaps something good will come out of this for you. Perhaps you'll learn something from this. But Misplaced Pages is not a game. You are either here to help build an encyclopedia or you should not be here at all. I learned that the hard way. Just take the advice of the others and back down. I doubt that you'll be unblocked this time.--Coldplay Expért 23:35, 15 January 2010 (UTC)
- He was taunting y'all. Two unblock requests have been declined, please feel free to lengthen the block to indef if need be. Gwen Gale (talk) 23:24, 15 January 2010 (UTC)
- Why not just 12 hours. :P --MW talk contribs 22:57, 15 January 2010 (UTC)
- Why indef? Why not a year? The infinity is too much time. --MW talk contribs 22:55, 15 January 2010 (UTC)
- As I told MisterWiki, if the next problem comes, the indef warning still stands. Gwen Gale (talk) 22:53, 15 January 2010 (UTC)
MisterWiki, I have blocked you for the next ten years for calling admins Nazis while already on the very edge of your welcome. Please use the time wisely. Blood Red Sandman 02:16, 17 January 2010 (UTC)
- Well, now I have time :). That's not what I tried to mean, I tried to say that the admins are very cruel and evil sometimes, not that they are nazis, because that's an exaggeration. --MW talk contribs 04:01, 17 January 2010 (UTC)
Vanished user 24kwjf10h32h (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Per above. I am sorry and it was really a stupid thing I said, but I explained it. There's no excuse for my moronic behaviour.
Decline reason:
I am declining your request for unblock because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that
- the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Misplaced Pages, or
- the block is no longer necessary because you
- understand what you have been blocked for,
- will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
- will make useful contributions instead.
Please read our guide to appealing blocks for more information. -FASTILY 04:35, 17 January 2010 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
- Sorry dude. I've made the same comparison and recieved a block from it. Likely you will be blocked for a while....Most likely not ten years but you never know...Hell In A Bucket (talk) 04:05, 17 January 2010 (UTC)
- I know I said that a bit angry because of the 24 hours block, but that the admins are nazi? I don't meant that. I explained it. --MW talk contribs 04:13, 17 January 2010 (UTC)
- You've done two stupid things in about 24 hours. How many stupid things do you plan to do, and then try to apologize your way out of? Based on the ANI discussion cited above, it is getting harder and harder to assume good faith on your part. Either you are here to screw around, or you lack the competence to recognize what appropriate behavior is. I am about to decline the above unblock request, at least for a little while. I really think that, based on your recent behavior, Misplaced Pages would benefit from your absense, at least for a little while longer. However, I would like to see what assurances you can make that these problems will not happen in the future. How about you propose some restrictions you would be willing to place on yourself. What will you do to stop these problems from continuing to crop up? --Jayron32 04:29, 17 January 2010 (UTC)
- Well, no more comments about nobody. And staying away from the user talk pages, Jayron. Please trust me, this time I will really not get you down. Please. I pray to you. I swear to you. --MW talk contribs 04:34, 17 January 2010 (UTC)
- This block is not necessary to prevent me to do that. I know what to do, I can think, I can argue. --MW talk contribs 04:37, 17 January 2010 (UTC)
- So let me get this straight: If unblocked, you will voluntarily stay away from the User talk space, and you will also voluntarily refrain from commenting about other users at all. Is that correct? I am willing to begin an unblock discussion at ANI with these terms if that is what you are agreeing to. I would also like to add Civlity parole to your restrictions. If you were to violate these restrictions, we will return your indefinate block. This needs to be understood as a last chance. If you can agree to this, I will initiate the discussion on these restrictions. --Jayron32 04:58, 17 January 2010 (UTC)
- (Crying) I agree, except for things that I would need, like to request things to users. --MW talk contribs 04:59, 17 January 2010 (UTC)
- No. Communicating with other users is a fundamental part of the Wiki collaboration. Completely object this ridiculous restriction. --ZooFari 07:11, 17 January 2010 (UTC)
- Agreed. It's rather like allowing somebody to participate in the 100 meters on the condition you can cut off their legs. MisterWiki, you said you didn't mean the admins were nazis. You called the admins Nazis! You're either trolling us or not competent and mature enough to contribute here. Ironholds (talk) 12:36, 17 January 2010 (UTC)
- So let me get this straight: If unblocked, you will voluntarily stay away from the User talk space, and you will also voluntarily refrain from commenting about other users at all. Is that correct? I am willing to begin an unblock discussion at ANI with these terms if that is what you are agreeing to. I would also like to add Civlity parole to your restrictions. If you were to violate these restrictions, we will return your indefinate block. This needs to be understood as a last chance. If you can agree to this, I will initiate the discussion on these restrictions. --Jayron32 04:58, 17 January 2010 (UTC)
- This block is not necessary to prevent me to do that. I know what to do, I can think, I can argue. --MW talk contribs 04:37, 17 January 2010 (UTC)
- Well, no more comments about nobody. And staying away from the user talk pages, Jayron. Please trust me, this time I will really not get you down. Please. I pray to you. I swear to you. --MW talk contribs 04:34, 17 January 2010 (UTC)
- You've done two stupid things in about 24 hours. How many stupid things do you plan to do, and then try to apologize your way out of? Based on the ANI discussion cited above, it is getting harder and harder to assume good faith on your part. Either you are here to screw around, or you lack the competence to recognize what appropriate behavior is. I am about to decline the above unblock request, at least for a little while. I really think that, based on your recent behavior, Misplaced Pages would benefit from your absense, at least for a little while longer. However, I would like to see what assurances you can make that these problems will not happen in the future. How about you propose some restrictions you would be willing to place on yourself. What will you do to stop these problems from continuing to crop up? --Jayron32 04:29, 17 January 2010 (UTC)
- I know I said that a bit angry because of the 24 hours block, but that the admins are nazi? I don't meant that. I explained it. --MW talk contribs 04:13, 17 January 2010 (UTC)
Vanished user 24kwjf10h32h (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Under the condition to not disturb anymore. This block is not necessary for the redirect and the insult, since that's not what I meant. Anybody can get wrong sometimes. This is really annoying to request unblocks each 12 hours, but I, voluntarilly agreed the conditions that Jayron gave me. Anyways, if the block is shortened to 1 year, after the year I will retire.
Decline reason:
No way, you had your chance. However, there is a proposal on my talk page on how you might be given another chance, provided the rest of the community agrees. Your best hope is to see if anything comes of that. Blood Red Sandman 15:29, 17 January 2010 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
I just want to concentrate on the things I like. Please re-consider it. A day was too much. I know what to do, exactly. I know certain user wants me blocked forever, but I just want to be back to finish some things I left, like Pichilemu, Thomas Anders v. Dieter Bohlen, and WP:TALKING. Thank you. --MW talk contribs 19:41, 17 January 2010 (UTC)
- Please do not use the {{helpme}} template for requesting unblocking. fetchcomms☛ 19:44, 17 January 2010 (UTC)
Vanished user 24kwjf10h32h (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I don't see that Vandalism: Calling admins Nazis whilst already blocked, and very shortly after an indef was removed. should be a block of 10 years. I know it was a idiotic thing to call them nazis, but the block it's not necessary to prevent me to damage the community. Oh my god, what more can I do. I just want to be back to fulfill the things I left incomplete. Well, this is the last time I will request unblock. I will not going to disturb you anymore if you are going to decline the unblock request. I really don't have anything more to say. This is really annoying to provoke troubles to you all, here and in the ANI. I don't promise anything, I just want to fulfill the things I left. --MW talk contribs 19:49, 17 January 2010 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Put quite simply, you blew your final chance. We won't be prepared to offer you another one for a long while. PeterSymonds (talk) 19:53, 17 January 2010 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Please stop repeated requests for unblock, it doesn't help you any. My advice would be to come back in a few months and I'm sure nobody will have a problem. However, if you place another unblock notice - which at this point serves only to waste time - I will modify your block so that you cannot edit your talkpage. Blood Red Sandman 21:01, 17 January 2010 (UTC)
- I said that I was not going to post it again. --MW talk contribs 21:06, 17 January 2010 (UTC)
- Come back in late April or early May. Gwen Gale (talk) 21:52, 17 January 2010 (UTC)
Personal information removed
Hi there, (as if things weren't bad enough :) )
You'll likely not be pleased about this, but I have suppressed a number of edits to your userspace, including your userpage and userboxes, which reveal personal information about yourself and your family. I've done this per policy, for your own protection and safety on-line, as you are a self-declared minor. I'm really sorry about that, and I know it's annoying, but it's for the best. Please don't re-add it - Alison 03:27, 16 January 2010 (UTC)
Siempre es reconfortante una palabra de apoyo en la adversidad.
Buena suerte en su solicitud de desbloqueo, espero que comprenda que Misplaced Pages no es un juego ni una pagina web para auspiciar gente o sitios web. Un abrazo, espero que reflexione y saque algo bueno de todo esto. Ccrazymann (talk) 16:14, 17 January 2010 (UTC)
- Gracias. --MW talk contribs 16:27, 17 January 2010 (UTC)
WP:NODRAMA/2
Just a quick reminder that the Second Great Misplaced Pages Dramaout has begun. Please log any work you do at Misplaced Pages:The Great Misplaced Pages Dramaout/2nd/Log. Good luck! --Jayron32 02:01, 18 January 2010 (UTC)
Fair use rationale for File:José Arraño Acevedo.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:José Arraño Acevedo.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Misplaced Pages constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.
If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Misplaced Pages page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. FASTILYsock 07:29, 18 January 2010 (UTC)
"Wiki project" Modern Talking
I have for the second time in two months moved this back to User:MisterWiki/WikiProject_Modern_Talking with all attendant pages. As I said before, you cannot call yourself a Wiki Project with only one active member (ie you). Assuming that at some point in the future you are unblocked, please do not attempt to recreate this project for a third time UNLESS it has at least half a dozen active members. Any attempt to do so will be considered disruptive behaviour, and may impact badly on any terms set for a potential unblock.--Elen of the Roads (talk) 10:54, 18 January 2010 (UTC)