| Revision as of 01:34, 12 February 2010 view sourceUnqstnableTruth (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers40,844 editsmNo edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 01:36, 12 February 2010 view source Sourside21 (talk | contribs)388 editsNo edit summaryNext edit → | ||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
| Dude, I happen to agree with you about the ] edit, it's uncited speculation. However, you are doing yourself no favours by failing to explain your reasons for the edit and continuously blanking your comments page. You have nothing to hide, and your edit makes sense. The issue is one of explanation and openness. Cheers ] (]) 07:52, 10 February 2010 (UTC) | Dude, I happen to agree with you about the ] edit, it's uncited speculation. However, you are doing yourself no favours by failing to explain your reasons for the edit and continuously blanking your comments page. You have nothing to hide, and your edit makes sense. The issue is one of explanation and openness. Cheers ] (]) 07:52, 10 February 2010 (UTC) | ||
| ==Re== | |||
| You're obviously new so I won't ]. That said, I will make just this one comment; did you just barely find out about professional wrestling and if so do you feel cheated as a result? | |||
| 1.] would like to inform you that WWE is a company that produces scripted entertainment and thus criticism in regards to their product being fake is a bit ridiculous and hardly ]. | |||
| 2.Judging by your edit history, it appears you have a tendency to ]. As such, in this scenario I advise you to ''"]"'' | |||
| 3.That said, don't take things too seriously because I guarantee you that if you do and you decide to get into a silly argument, you will lose. | |||
| Regards. <sup>--]]--</sup> 01:34, 12 February 2010 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 01:36, 12 February 2010
OnLive
Dude, I happen to agree with you about the OnLive edit, it's uncited speculation. However, you are doing yourself no favours by failing to explain your reasons for the edit and continuously blanking your comments page. You have nothing to hide, and your edit makes sense. The issue is one of explanation and openness. Cheers MrMarmite (talk) 07:52, 10 February 2010 (UTC)