Misplaced Pages

Revision as of 00:55, 31 March 2010

If you leave me a message, I will respond here and will let you know on your talk page using the {{Talkback}} template.

Comment

Thanks for the encouragement! --SlothMcCarty (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 19:58, 16 March 2009 (UTC).

Web 3.0

I cannot remeber why I restored the article, though I must have had a good reason. However the article was quite extensive and has been useryfied here. Rich Farmbrough, 09:51 18 March 2009 (UTC).

I asked for the old Web 3.0 article to be restored to my userspace, so that I could unpick what was useful and feed it into a new Web 2.0, along with unpickings from Web 1.0. I did this because there is clearly no appetite for Web 3.0 or Web 1.0, given that so many people are even unhappy with an article on Web 2.0. More on this over on my Web 3.0 talk page. Greyskinnedboy (talk) 06:39, 19 March 2009 (UTC)

TUSC token 385f3d8a6cf55ef7260d4a2eebb71bdb

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!

Law of Chastity

You previously made some contributions to the article Law of Chastity, and there are some comments up for discussion on the talk page that you might like to weigh in on. -- btphelps 06:17, 24 June 2009 (UTC)

All Caps

Regarding your comment: yes, it is a form of yelling and calling attention to oneself. Kind of obnoxious and, besides, educational psychologists tell us it is very hard to read. I hope you are aware that I didn't leave this on the file. The edit was left on 01:23, 4 September 2009 by anon user 66.7.168.196. But I was in mindless revert mode on anon edits and inadvertently hit the button. Best wishes. WBardwin (talk) 06:01, 4 September 2009 (UTC)

There's already enough drama at marriage

Forcing stability on the page should be done on the basis of content. The passage has been endlessly controversial and simply removing it is not unreasonable. If you think the passage needs to stay, then argue for it. Mangoe (talk) 05:27, 21 January 2010 (UTC)

I, personally, detest excessive use of the shiny "undo" button, and I felt rather icky when I used it twice within the space of 5 minutes. You do have a point. I will try to make myself clear on Talk:Marriage about what material I think should stay and why. ...but what do you think? ~BFizz 06:24, 21 January 2010 (UTC)

I like the boxed off Confucius quote. Mangoe (talk) 15:11, 22 January 2010 (UTC)

Barnstar

RE: Your comment on Misplaced Pages:Requests for comment/Biographies of living people, which will delete the vast majority of 50,000 articles created by 17,400 editors, mostly new editors.

		What a Brilliant Idea Barnstar
		The "What a Brilliant Idea!" Barnstar should be awarded to a user who figures out an elegant solution to a particularly burdensome bottleneck or problem, or who identifies a means to improve Misplaced Pages in a profound way. This barnstar is gratefully awarded to B Fizz for or your great idea about deletion. Thank you. Ikip 09:40, 26 January 2010 (UTC)

Invitation

This may be your cup of tea. :) I would be happy to see you there.

Hello, B Fizz. You have been invited to join the Article Rescue Squadron, a collaborative effort to rescue articles from deletion if they can be improved through regular editing. For more information, please visit the project page, where you can >> join << and help rescue articles tagged for deletion and rescue. Ikip 09:42, 26 January 2010 (UTC)

OpenID

A few months ago, you suggested an OpenID userbox, what do you think of User:Awg1010/OpenID. Its an early draft and I could use some input. Thanks, Awg1010 (talk) 23:41, 7 February 2010 (UTC)

Looks pretty good already. I've started using it. =) The links are good, as is the text. I'm not a big fan of the orange background; you might consider changing the image background and the text background to be the same color, or shades of the same. ...but what do you think? ~BFizz 03:36, 8 February 2010 (UTC)

Okay I've switched it to a light yellow background that looks better with the text and link colors. By the way, I have no idea how to Categorize the box or those who use it. Thanks, Awg1010 (talk) 20:12, 8 February 2010 (UTC)

I have no idea how to do that either, but I'll look into it and see what I can do to help. ...but what do you think? ~BFizz 00:14, 9 February 2010 (UTC)

Site and no 11

Maybe we should remove some sites, I agree with you...--Automyte (talk) 19:47, 12 February 2010 (UTC)

Final discussion for Misplaced Pages:Requests for comment/Biographies of living people

Hello, I note that you have commented on the first phase of Misplaced Pages:Requests for comment/Biographies of living people

As this RFC closes, there are two proposals being considered:

1. Proposal to Close This RfC
2. Alternate proposal to close this RFC: we don't need a whole new layer of bureaucracy

Your opinion on this is welcome. Okip 02:08, 24 February 2010 (UTC)

Non Free Files in your User Space

Hey there B Fizz, thank you for your contributions! I am a bot alerting you that Non-free files are not allowed in the user or talk-space. I removed some files that I found on User:B Fizz. In the future, please refrain from adding fair-use files to your user-space drafts or your talk page.

• See a log of files removed today here.

• Shut off the bot here.

• Report errors here.

Thank you, -- DASHBot (talk) 04:56, 27 February 2010 (UTC)

This was in response to me placing a fair-use image that I had uploaded in the image gallery on my user page. I should have realized it wasn't fair use to also have it on my user page; thanks for the reminder. ...but what do you think? ~BFizz 07:41, 27 February 2010 (UTC)

Mormonism

Hi BFizz - I noticed you made the edit I had proposed on the Mormonism discussion page re: the NPOV introductory statement. Thanks for stepping in - I'll check back in a couple of days on it just in case somebody disagrees. Cheers. 76.173.253.120 (talk) 18:48, 29 March 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for mentioning that. I intended to also explain myself on the talk page but apparently forgot. ...comments? ~BFizz 02:25, 30 March 2010 (UTC)

Your latest 'action' against me

I responded to you on that page, but would like to point out that you have a habit of avoiding issues that I bring up. Why is that ? Simply not responding does not make them less relevent. But what do you think ? Cheers. Duke53 | 05:10, 30 March 2010 (UTC)

you have a habit of avoiding issues that I bring up - I would tend to say the same of you. Regarding my behavior: usually I don't comment when I don't have anything valuable to add to discussion. If I strongly agree or disagree, have something relevant to say, or wish to make my own point, then I speak up. ...comments? ~BFizz 06:28, 30 March 2010 (UTC)

p.s. I've changed my mind and decided that I do kind of like your old signature and, since you've abandoned it, will be using it; if you have any copyright or 'intellectual property' issues with that, please let me know. Thank You. Duke53 | 05:10, 30 March 2010 (UTC)

I generally despise the concept of Intellectual property; you may consider my old signature to be "public domain" if it concerns you. Bold, italics, and underline is a bit much, though. I also recommend the <small> tag. ...comments? ~BFizz 06:28, 30 March 2010 (UTC)

Warning

Welcome to Misplaced Pages. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, talk pages are meant to be a record of a discussion; deleting or editing legitimate comments is considered bad practice, even if you meant well. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Duke53 | 00:55, 31 March 2010 (UTC)