Misplaced Pages

Ectoprocta: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from[REDACTED] with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 22:14, 20 January 2006 editLeonardoGregianin (talk | contribs)336 edits pt interwiki← Previous edit Revision as of 01:12, 30 January 2006 edit undoGdrbot (talk | contribs)45,158 editsm nomialbot — converted multi-template taxobox to {{Taxobox}}Next edit →
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Taxobox
{{Taxobox_begin | color = pink | name = Ectoprocts}}
{{Taxobox_begin_placement | color = pink}} | color = pink
| name = Ectoprocts
{{Taxobox_regnum_entry | taxon = ]ia}}
| regnum = ]ia
{{Taxobox_phylum_entry | taxon = '''Ectoprocta'''}}<br/>{{Taxobox authority | author = ] | date = 1870}}
| phylum = '''Ectoprocta'''
{{Taxobox_end_placement}}
| phylum_authority = ], 1870
{{Taxobox_section_subdivision | color = pink | plural_taxon = Classes}}
| subdivision_ranks = Classes
| subdivision =
]<br> ]<br>
]<br> ]<br>
]<br> ]<br>
}}
{{Taxobox_end}}


The '''Ectoprocta''' are a ] of ] ]s. Formerly these animals made up one division of the ], the other being the ], which they superficially resemble. However, the Entoprocta are no longer thought to be closely related to the Ectoprocta, and are generally considered a phylum of their own. This leaves Ectoprocta as the only subgroup of Bryozoa: some researchers treat the two names as synonyms; others use Ectoprocta only. The '''Ectoprocta''' are a ] of ] ]s. Formerly these animals made up one division of the ], the other being the ], which they superficially resemble. However, the Entoprocta are no longer thought to be closely related to the Ectoprocta, and are generally considered a phylum of their own. This leaves Ectoprocta as the only subgroup of Bryozoa: some researchers treat the two names as synonyms; others use Ectoprocta only.

Revision as of 01:12, 30 January 2006

Ectoprocts
Scientific classification
Kingdom: Animalia
Phylum: Ectoprocta
Nitsche, 1870
Classes

Phylactolaemata
Stenolaemata
Gymnolaemata

The Ectoprocta are a phylum of lophophorate animals. Formerly these animals made up one division of the Bryozoa, the other being the Entoprocta, which they superficially resemble. However, the Entoprocta are no longer thought to be closely related to the Ectoprocta, and are generally considered a phylum of their own. This leaves Ectoprocta as the only subgroup of Bryozoa: some researchers treat the two names as synonyms; others use Ectoprocta only.

Generally, the members of the ectoprocta phylum are colonial aquatic animals (also known as moss animals). Although the individual members are microscopic, colonies can grow up to one foot in length. They can reproduce both sexually and asexually. The Ectoprocta are one of the few classical phyla from which no members have been found in the Cambrian. They seem to have evolved in the Ordovician. Currently, there are about 5,000 living species in this phylum.

Stub icon

This animal-related article is a stub. You can help Misplaced Pages by expanding it.

Categories:
Ectoprocta: Difference between revisions Add topic