Revision as of 18:56, 30 June 2010 editMickMacNee (talk | contribs)23,386 edits →Alternate account status: new section← Previous edit | Revision as of 12:53, 1 July 2010 edit undoMo ainm (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers9,265 edits →Alternate account status: respond to MickNext edit → | ||
Line 22: | Line 22: | ||
Your user page declares that this is a legitimate alternate account of an established user, yet you have not identified your other account. Please confirm whether or not this is intentional, and if it is, whether or not you have read and understood the points in the ] policy which define the circumstances under which you can and cannot hide your alternate account's identity. ] (]) 18:56, 30 June 2010 (UTC) | Your user page declares that this is a legitimate alternate account of an established user, yet you have not identified your other account. Please confirm whether or not this is intentional, and if it is, whether or not you have read and understood the points in the ] policy which define the circumstances under which you can and cannot hide your alternate account's identity. ] (]) 18:56, 30 June 2010 (UTC) | ||
: Read what it says this is a clean start to get away from prejudiced editors who are intolerant of any opinions differing from their own. ''A clean start is permitted only if there are no bans, blocks or active sanctions in place against your old account.'' Which there were none. And ''You are not obliged to reveal previous accounts...''' but I have done and at least one admin is aware of this. So stay off my page and I hope I don't have the displeasure of any interaction with you again, happy editing. ]] 12:53, 1 July 2010 (UTC) |
Revision as of 12:53, 1 July 2010
Please place new messages at the bottom of this page. I will respond to comments here, unless there's a better place for them. Please read the following helpful hints, as well as our talk page guidelines before posting: |
- I am not an administrator. That means I cannot block, unblock, delete, undelete, protect or unprotect. You can report vandalism here and suspicious usernames here. Go here if you want something deleted.
- I reserve the right to remove inappropriate comments. This includes vandalism and trolling. I also reserve the right to refactor ugly HTML, or to trim unnecessary stuff (e.g. http://en.wikipedia.org/Article to Article).
- If you're here to inform me of a mistake I made while on recent changes patrol, please indicate which article is concerned by enclosing the title of the article in two sets of square brackets: ]. If you're an IP and got reverted for deleting text, make sure you use an edit summary next time.
- If I reverted your link addition(s), please review your intentions. Spam is the systematic addition of external links and/or promotional material in disregard of Misplaced Pages's mission. Such links may also have questionable content. Spammers are not welcome on Misplaced Pages. If you wish to constructively contribute to the encyclopedia, please read our guidelines on external links and avoiding tripping our spam radar by accident.
Archives |
This page has archives. Sections older than 5 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III. |
Thank you
Thank you Oloinsigh (talk) 14:09, 16 June 2010 (UTC)
- No problem. Mo ainm~Talk 14:38, 16 June 2010 (UTC)
why is it so difficult to add a prominant person?
Matt Moran is a notable and prominant in Australia. More prominant than many other Australians that have wiki pages dedicated to them. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Peterhanson1961 (talk • contribs) 11:21, 21 June 2010 (UTC)
- I replied on the article talk page. Mo ainm~Talk 11:25, 21 June 2010 (UTC)
Speedy deletion declined: Matt Moran
Hello Mo ainm. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Matt Moran, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: some celebrity chefs are notable, some aren't. If you think this chap is in the latter group then I suggest AFD. Thank you. ϢereSpielChequers 15:56, 21 June 2010 (UTC)
- No problem thanks for the heads up. Mo ainm~Talk 17:22, 21 June 2010 (UTC)
Alternate account status
Your user page declares that this is a legitimate alternate account of an established user, yet you have not identified your other account. Please confirm whether or not this is intentional, and if it is, whether or not you have read and understood the points in the legitimate alternate account policy which define the circumstances under which you can and cannot hide your alternate account's identity. MickMacNee (talk) 18:56, 30 June 2010 (UTC)
- Read what it says this is a clean start to get away from prejudiced editors who are intolerant of any opinions differing from their own. A clean start is permitted only if there are no bans, blocks or active sanctions in place against your old account. Which there were none. And You are not obliged to reveal previous accounts...' but I have done and at least one admin is aware of this. So stay off my page and I hope I don't have the displeasure of any interaction with you again, happy editing. Mo ainm~Talk 12:53, 1 July 2010 (UTC)