| Revision as of 15:49, 21 July 2010 editSandstein (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators188,625 edits →Arbitration enforcement warning: discretionary sanctions (WP:ARBPIA): new section← Previous edit | Revision as of 16:29, 21 July 2010 edit undoPantherskin (talk | contribs)1,090 edits →BlockedNext edit → | ||
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
| The block time is extremely unfair. It is the first ever editor's block, and 30 hours are unheard of. ] was blocked only for 16 hours by the same admin for the same "slow-motion edit-warring".Tariqabjotu, may I please ask you to reconsider the time of the block? Thanks.--] (]) 15:33, 21 July 2010 (UTC) | The block time is extremely unfair. It is the first ever editor's block, and 30 hours are unheard of. ] was blocked only for 16 hours by the same admin for the same "slow-motion edit-warring".Tariqabjotu, may I please ask you to reconsider the time of the block? Thanks.--] (]) 15:33, 21 July 2010 (UTC) | ||
| : Thanks Mbz1, but I really do not care. If I am guilty of edit-warring so is Nableezy who also reverted several times within a few days. So it be. The real problem is rather that Supreme Deliciousness and Nableezy got away with lying about a source. What we have now is an article section which is bordering a hoax. I do not even want to know what damage these two editors have done at other articles. And I am saying that as someone who thinks that this section should make it clear that Israel was not a saint either. ] (]) 16:29, 21 July 2010 (UTC) | |||
| == Arbitration enforcement warning: discretionary sanctions (]) == | == Arbitration enforcement warning: discretionary sanctions (]) == | ||
Revision as of 16:29, 21 July 2010
FYI
Misplaced Pages:Redirects_for_discussion#Genocide_of_Ottoman_Turks_and_Muslims. Pcap ping 03:02, 14 May 2010 (UTC)
SPI
You may wish to present evidence at this SPI:. TFD (talk) 06:59, 18 June 2010 (UTC)
edit warring
You have been reported to the edit-warring noticeboard, you can see this here. nableezy - 07:18, 21 July 2010 (UTC)
Blocked
{{unblock|Your reason here}} along with the reason you believe the block is unjustified, or email the blocking administrator. For alternative methods to appeal, see Misplaced Pages:Appealing a block. -- tariqabjotu 14:13, 21 July 2010 (UTC)
The block time is extremely unfair. It is the first ever editor's block, and 30 hours are unheard of. user:RomaC was blocked only for 16 hours by the same admin for the same "slow-motion edit-warring".Tariqabjotu, may I please ask you to reconsider the time of the block? Thanks.--Mbz1 (talk) 15:33, 21 July 2010 (UTC)
- Thanks Mbz1, but I really do not care. If I am guilty of edit-warring so is Nableezy who also reverted several times within a few days. So it be. The real problem is rather that Supreme Deliciousness and Nableezy got away with lying about a source. What we have now is an article section which is bordering a hoax. I do not even want to know what damage these two editors have done at other articles. And I am saying that as someone who thinks that this section should make it clear that Israel was not a saint either. Pantherskin (talk) 16:29, 21 July 2010 (UTC)
Arbitration enforcement warning: discretionary sanctions (WP:ARBPIA)
The Arbitration Committee has permitted administrators to impose, at their own discretion, sanctions on any editor working on pages broadly related to the Arab-Israeli conflict if the editor repeatedly or seriously fails to adhere to the purpose of Misplaced Pages, any expected standards of behavior, or any normal editorial process. If you engage in further inappropriate behavior in this area, you may be placed under sanctions including blocks, a revert limitation or an article ban. The committee's full decision can be read at Misplaced Pages:Requests for arbitration/Palestine-Israel articles#Final decision. Sandstein 15:49, 21 July 2010 (UTC)