| Revision as of 21:56, 21 August 2010 editNishidani (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users99,556 edits →Bullying in the schoolyard← Previous edit | Revision as of 21:56, 21 August 2010 edit undoNishidani (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users99,556 edits →Bullying in the schoolyardNext edit → | ||
| Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
| I see that far from issuing an apology, you've deleted my last protest. I think I need help to deal with you. When I was at high school we were told that if someone in the schoolyard bullies you, get help from the older guys. So I have. ] (]) 20:55, 21 August 2010 (UTC) | I see that far from issuing an apology, you've deleted my last protest. I think I need help to deal with you. When I was at high school we were told that if someone in the schoolyard bullies you, get help from the older guys. So I have. ] (]) 20:55, 21 August 2010 (UTC) | ||
| :Courtesy notice: he's listed it for review. It's currently at ] (after I moved it from ].) --] <sup>]</sup> 21:07, 21 August 2010 (UTC) | :Courtesy notice: he's listed it for review. It's currently at ] (after I moved it from ].) --] <sup>]</sup> 21:07, 21 August 2010 (UTC) | ||
| ::]. I doubt you would think advice from me is welcome. I can understand the reasoning behind your recent actions, having run through the evidence, though I know nothing of the prior case you alluded to. But acting on that intuition without going through the usual drill of referring the suspicion to the appropriate sockpuppetry admins was precipitate. I feel somewhat responsible for this. I expressed a personal view of your editing as I experienced it, and this may have contributed to a sense of exasperation, after a new editor http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Talk:Shakespeare_authorship_question/sandbox_draft&diff=prev&oldid=379841701 challenged you a mere two days after registering. I apologize if so. The coincidence itself, in retrospect, could well look as though some organized encircling was afoot. ] (]) 21:56, 21 August 2010 (UTC) | ::]. I doubt you would think advice from me is welcome. I can understand the reasoning behind your recent actions, having run through the evidence, though I know nothing of the prior case you alluded to. But acting on that intuition without going through the usual drill of referring the suspicion to the appropriate sockpuppetry admins was precipitate. I feel somewhat responsible for this. I expressed a personal view of your editing as I experienced it, and this may have contributed to a sense of exasperation, after a new editor a mere two days after registering. I apologize if so. The coincidence itself, in retrospect, could well look as though some organized encircling was afoot. ] (]) 21:56, 21 August 2010 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 21:56, 21 August 2010
/Archive 1 /Archive 2 /Archive 3 /Archive 4 /Archive 5 /Archive 6 (articles) /Archive 7
Shakespeare authorship question request for mediation
I have filed a request for arbitration on this question, naming you as one of the interested parties. Would you please sign your acceptance? Otherwise, let me know and I’ll remove your name from the request. Tom Reedy (talk) 19:03, 19 August 2010 (UTC)
- Are you not interested in getting this issue settled? Tom Reedy (talk) 14:32, 20 August 2010 (UTC)
- I have 7 days to respond. Please give it to me. I don't need to be hounded daily. I am pretty busy with real life until this weekend. Thanks. Smatprt (talk) 22:16, 20 August 2010 (UTC)
Bullying in the schoolyard
I see that far from issuing an apology, you've deleted my last protest. I think I need help to deal with you. When I was at high school we were told that if someone in the schoolyard bullies you, get help from the older guys. So I have. RewlandUmmer (talk) 20:55, 21 August 2010 (UTC)
- Courtesy notice: he's listed it for review. It's currently at Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#Persecution by another editor (after I moved it from WP:AN.) --Moonriddengirl 21:07, 21 August 2010 (UTC)
- Smatprt. I doubt you would think advice from me is welcome. I can understand the reasoning behind your recent actions, having run through the evidence, though I know nothing of the prior case you alluded to. But acting on that intuition without going through the usual drill of referring the suspicion to the appropriate sockpuppetry admins was precipitate. I feel somewhat responsible for this. I expressed a personal view of your editing as I experienced it, and this may have contributed to a sense of exasperation, after a new editor challenged you a mere two days after registering. I apologize if so. The coincidence itself, in retrospect, could well look as though some organized encircling was afoot. Nishidani (talk) 21:56, 21 August 2010 (UTC)