Misplaced Pages

:Sockpuppet investigations/Flowerman75: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from[REDACTED] with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations Browse history interactivelyNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 11:09, 29 August 2010 editBlackCab (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers14,322 editsm ←Created page with '{{subst:SPI report |checkuser=no <!-- Please do not enter anything in the subject/headline box! If you want to request checkuser, simply change the line above this...'  Revision as of 18:54, 29 August 2010 edit undoFlowerman75 (talk | contribs)64 edits →Evidence submitted by BlackCabNext edit →
Line 19: Line 19:
======<span style="font-size:150%"> Evidence submitted by ] </span>====== ======<span style="font-size:150%"> Evidence submitted by ] </span>======
] and ], both of whom come from Kerala, India, (Jehonathan) (Matrix356) were blocked for sockpuppetry on August 19. Flowerman75 account was opened four days later. There are strong similarities between the edits of these users, both in subject matter (predominantly related to Jehovah's Witnesses), writing style and user page content and a common interest in Kerala, India. ] (]) 11:09, 29 August 2010 (UTC) ] and ], both of whom come from Kerala, India, (Jehonathan) (Matrix356) were blocked for sockpuppetry on August 19. Flowerman75 account was opened four days later. There are strong similarities between the edits of these users, both in subject matter (predominantly related to Jehovah's Witnesses), writing style and user page content and a common interest in Kerala, India. ] (]) 11:09, 29 August 2010 (UTC)
:I have serious privacy issue with the above user who accused me. He is searching inside my user page and may be following me . So I want to delete or block this user account. I am convinced that most of my interested article are currently neutral and hence I not intend any serious edits in near future. As admins know this funny LTSally(male or female or ?-:)) is simply wasting time and resource of check users because its a known fact that their is no proper solution yet discovered for user blocking in the history of Internet. But I assure you I have no intention of becoming a dangerous editor, because I had always contributed only for better articles which may had upset user:BlackCab in ] . Thank you...] (]) 18:54, 29 August 2010 (UTC)


======<span style="font-size:150%"> Comments by accused parties &nbsp;&nbsp; </span>====== ======<span style="font-size:150%"> Comments by accused parties &nbsp;&nbsp; </span>======

Revision as of 18:54, 29 August 2010

– This SPI case is open.

Flowerman75

Flowerman75 (talk · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)

For archived investigations, see Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations/Flowerman75/Archive.


29 August 2010
Suspected sockpuppets



Evidence submitted by BlackCab

User:Matrix356 and User:Jehonathan, both of whom come from Kerala, India, (Jehonathan) (Matrix356) were blocked for sockpuppetry on August 19. Flowerman75 account was opened four days later. There are strong similarities between the edits of these users, both in subject matter (predominantly related to Jehovah's Witnesses), writing style and user page content and a common interest in Kerala, India. BlackCab (talk) 11:09, 29 August 2010 (UTC)

I have serious privacy issue with the above user who accused me. He is searching inside my user page and may be following me . So I want to delete or block this user account. I am convinced that most of my interested article are currently neutral and hence I not intend any serious edits in near future. As admins know this funny LTSally(male or female or ?-:)) is simply wasting time and resource of check users because its a known fact that their is no proper solution yet discovered for user blocking in the history of Internet. But I assure you I have no intention of becoming a dangerous editor, because I had always contributed only for better articles which may had upset user:BlackCab in this case . Thank you...Flowerman75 (talk) 18:54, 29 August 2010 (UTC)
Comments by accused parties   

See Defending yourself against claims.


Comments by other users
Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments
Categories:
Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations/Flowerman75: Difference between revisions Add topic