Misplaced Pages

User talk:Mackay 86: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from[REDACTED] with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 15:15, 24 September 2010 editMackay 86 (talk | contribs)1,477 edits Blanked the page← Previous edit Revision as of 15:19, 24 September 2010 edit undoBegoon (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers46,915 editsNo edit summaryNext edit →
Line 1: Line 1:
== Edits to Templates ==

When you make an edit to a template, such as you did at: ], '''please''' check the implications of your edit, by checking the "What links here" link, such as ].

On this occasion, your edit broke the transclusion of the template onto the following articles:
*]
*]
*]
*]

Fortunately, only 4 articles were affected here (which I have fixed) - but it could easily have been dozens, or hundreds, which is why checking is essential.

Thank you.  ]•] 08:26, 16 September 2010 (UTC)

==I'm quite stunned==
You deleted the above post about Templates. I assumed that meant you had read it. I'll ] and assume you didn't realise it applied to infoboxes, too.

The edits which you are edit warring over, at ] are breaking the transclusion on a huge number of articles - see

Unless you understand what you are doing with edits to templates or infoboxes, please stop doing it. I'm assuming good faith at the moment, but if you don't stop I'll need to bring it to an Administrator's attention.  ]•] 15:19, 24 September 2010 (UTC)

Revision as of 15:19, 24 September 2010

Edits to Templates

When you make an edit to a template, such as you did at: Template:Infobox former political post, please check the implications of your edit, by checking the "What links here" link, such as Special:WhatLinksHere/Template:Infobox_former_political_post.

On this occasion, your edit broke the transclusion of the template onto the following articles:

Fortunately, only 4 articles were affected here (which I have fixed) - but it could easily have been dozens, or hundreds, which is why checking is essential.

Thank you.  Begoon•talk 08:26, 16 September 2010 (UTC)

I'm quite stunned

You deleted the above post about Templates. I assumed that meant you had read it. I'll AGF and assume you didn't realise it applied to infoboxes, too.

The edits which you are edit warring over, at Template:Infobox Monarchy are breaking the transclusion on a huge number of articles - see here:

Unless you understand what you are doing with edits to templates or infoboxes, please stop doing it. I'm assuming good faith at the moment, but if you don't stop I'll need to bring it to an Administrator's attention.  Begoon•talk 15:19, 24 September 2010 (UTC)

User talk:Mackay 86: Difference between revisions Add topic