| Revision as of 05:56, 4 December 2010 editProtonk (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers24,727 editsm →http://en.wikipedia.org/User:Dmitri1999: fix link← Previous edit | Revision as of 05:59, 4 December 2010 edit undoProtonk (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers24,727 edits →User talk:Dmitri1999Next edit → | ||
| Line 401: | Line 401: | ||
| This is my own little space and the only people who see this page is ME. There was no valid reason behind the deletion. I am extremely pissed right now to the point I am considering deleting all the contributions I've made. | This is my own little space and the only people who see this page is ME. There was no valid reason behind the deletion. I am extremely pissed right now to the point I am considering deleting all the contributions I've made. | ||
| It's just bad how some can just come in to your own little page(not an article for god's sake) and just completely delete it! | It's just bad how some can just come in to your own little page(not an article for god's sake) and just completely delete it! | ||
| *I've restored the page and blanked it. Notwithstanding the fact that it is your talk page, you may not use any[REDACTED] page as a personal advertisement. Misplaced Pages is not the place to host your cv. I can see in the history that you have added that material several times. Please don't. I'm also going to remind you that when you made contributions to[REDACTED] you ''irrevocably'' released them to the GFDL--you can't come back later and unilaterally delete them. so please don't try that either. ] (]) 05:59, 4 December 2010 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 05:59, 4 December 2010
Requests for undeletion is a process intended to assist users in restoring pages that were uncontroversially deleted via proposed deletion, under certain speedy deletion criteria (such as CSD G6), or in articles for deletion debates with little or no participation other than the nominator. This page is also intended to serve as a central location to request that deleted content be userfied or emailed to you so the content can be improved upon prior to re-insertion into the mainspace, or used elsewhere (you may also make a request directly to one of the administrators listed here). This means that content deleted after discussion—at articles for deletion, categories for discussion, or miscellany for deletion among other XfD processes—may in some cases be provided to you, but such controversial page deletions will not be overturned through this process.
This page is only for requesting undeletion of articles which have already been deleted. If the article you are concerned about is still visible, but has a warning message (template) at the top, please do not post here, but follow the instructions on the template or on your talk page.
Note that requests for undeletion is not a replacement for deletion review. If you feel an administrator has erred in closing a deletion discussion or in applying a speedy deletion criterion, please contact them directly. If you are unable to resolve the issue on their talk page, it should be raised at Misplaced Pages:Deletion review, rather than here.
 | To contest deletions that have have already been discussed (in particular, at Articles for deletion), or that are likely to be controversial, please make a request at Misplaced Pages:Deletion review instead. |
| Deletion discussions |
|---|
| Articles |
| Templates and modules |
| Files |
| Categories |
| Redirects |
| Miscellany |
| Speedy deletion |
| Proposed deletion |
Caitlin Rose
I can provide references for the facts that are stated -Scottcampbell14 (talk) 15:53, 23 November 2010 (UTC)— Scottcampbell14 (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
- Assuming you are talking about Caitlin Rose: she might actually be notable. Please create a new, clean article that doesn't read like a press release: free of peacock words like "megastar", contains no blather about "represents the future of country music", and contains references to actual articles in actual reliable sources. The version that was deleted was clearly written by somebody in an advertising-related profession. Maybe we can get an article created before those cigarettes kill her. --Orange Mike | Talk 16:19, 23 November 2010 (UTC)
- She is notable, I've created a sourced stub. Fences&Windows 00:04, 1 December 2010 (UTC)
Trust Territory of Marie Byrd Land and Ellsworth Land Antarctica
- Trust Territory of Marie Byrd Land and Ellsworth Land Antarctica · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) ·
This article is false. This is a fictional land that does not exist. Please see Marie Byrd Land and Antarctic Treaty System. This a hoax circulated by D. Izzo across the web. -Cêsar (talk) 21:32, 24 November 2010 (UTC)
Not done This is requests for undeletion. To request a page's deletion, please see WP:DEL. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 22:10, 24 November 2010 (UTC)
- See Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/United States Territory of Marie Byrd Land and Ellsworth Land Antarctica; this is a perennial. --Orange Mike | Talk 22:15, 24 November 2010 (UTC)
- Sorry. I'm not speak English.--Cêsar (talk) 22:29, 24 November 2010 (UTC)
- This hoax page has been been deleted. It has been put in many times under different titles, but we delete it every time. Thank you for warning us. JohnCD (talk) 09:55, 25 November 2010 (UTC)
- Sorry. I'm not speak English.--Cêsar (talk) 22:29, 24 November 2010 (UTC)
http://en.wikipedia.org/SAT_calculator_program
- SAT Calculator Program · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) ·
Not an advertisement. Information relevant to the SAT test was presented regarding calculator programs permitted for use during the mathematics sections of the SAT test. -24.101.36.21 (talk) 22:02, 24 November 2010 (UTC)
- Not done - a deleted page with this name does not appear to exist. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 22:09, 24 November 2010 (UTC)
- Er, if you follow the link in the title you can see it was deleted via prod... so I've restored it. Fences&Windows 22:56, 30 November 2010 (UTC)
David Naughton (producer)
hi, I am the David Naughton that has been deleted. I never started the page... although over time I did amend it (and I know others I worked with did so also) Although I am not broken by its deletion - I have used it in reference to myself on occasion & this may be a minor irritation.
I have had an engineering career for over 15 years & a production career since 2004.
Is the problem that - I am listed as a producer in parenthesis and not engineer?
I wish to re-introduce myself into the world of Wiki.
There are more credits in the pipeline as producer, engineer, mixer, remixer, programmer, percussionist & bassist & guitarist.
Thanks in advance to the moderators
DN Thebhoydave (talk) 09:36, 25 November 2010 (UTC)
- Not done. (As you gave no reason here, I have copied above what you wrote on the article talk page). This article was deleted as a result of the deletion discussions at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/David Naughton (producer) and Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/David Naughton (producer) (2nd nomination) so, as clearly stated at the top of this page, it cannot be restored here. If you think the discussions were not properly closed, or if you have new information, you should first talk to user Ron Ritzman (talk · contribs), the admin who closed them; then if you are not satisfied, you can take it to WP:Deletion review. JohnCD (talk) 10:44, 25 November 2010 (UTC)
Ghil'ad Zuckermann
This academic is a full Professor of Linguistics and Endangered Languages at the University of Adelaide. He is an authority on language revitalization and language contact and meets the requirements of notability. According to the Deletion Log an article about this academic was deleted more than two years ago for notability reasons. These reasons are by now irrelevant. For example, this academic was only an Associate Professor at the time of the deletion. -Aborig (talk) 18:05, 25 November 2010 (UTC)
- Not done - As announced prominently at the top of the page, this process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially and has no applicability to articles deleted after any deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Ghil'ad Zuckermann, it cannot be undeleted through this process. Nevertheless, if you believe that the consensus found at the discussion was in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user Stifle (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 18:22, 25 November 2010 (UTC)
GlobalCollect
- GlobalCollect · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) ·
I've created honest content about GlobalCollect, page was originally deleted because of advertising -Marky555 (talk) 14:10, 26 November 2010 (UTC)
- Not done. Because of attempts to use it for advertising, the page has been salted - protected against creation. What you should do is make a draft in your user space, and then approach user Jehochman (talk · contribs), the admin who salted it, for permission to post your version. More advice on how to do that on your talk page soon. JohnCD (talk) 18:07, 26 November 2010 (UTC)
Moe Pipe Organ Company
Article concerns a well known company with a wide area of coverage and a number of restoration of important pipe organs in the upper midwest -68.119.21.47 (talk) 16:59, 26 November 2010 (UTC)
Done – as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored upon request. I will notify user All Is One (talk · contribs), who proposed it, in case he wishes to nominate it at Articles for deletion. The article needs some independent references to establish notability - at present it is mainly a list of organ repair projects with references which seem to be from the company itself describing what they did. JohnCD (talk) 18:21, 26 November 2010 (UTC)
Added independent references to establish notability
Ekram Ahmed Lenin
- Ekram Ahmed Lenin · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) ·
No reasoning given. -Mrkshahin (talk) 21:58, 26 November 2010 (UTC)
- Not done The article was deleted because it was a recreation of an article that had been discussed by the community, and the result was to delete. Additional re-creations may lead to the prevention of that article ever being created. You are welcome to take the matter to deletion review (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 22:02, 26 November 2010 (UTC)
Rich Raddon
Notable for large "Yes on 8" Proposition 8 donation ($1,500) and for co-founding MovieClips.com, one of TIME magazine's Top 50 websites of 2010 -Eagleburas (talk) 03:14, 27 November 2010 (UTC)
- Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. --Ron Ritzman (talk) 03:18, 27 November 2010 (UTC)
Lutheran Medical Center
Article was deleted under CSD:A7 and G11 without prior discussion. The subject is a New York State recognized Level I Trauma Center and New York State Department of Health designated Stroke Center. I would like to salvage and rewrite as part of WikiProject Hospitals. Ng.j (talk) 17:51, 27 November 2010 (UTC) -Ng.j (talk) 17:51, 27 November 2010 (UTC)
- Not done - this page is a copyright violation. Essentially, all the content has been copied verbatim from the medical centre website, press releases and other on-line sources. Spartaz 18:02, 27 November 2010 (UTC)
- No infobox, pictures, coordinates or anything else salvageable? If not I will start fresh. Ng.j (talk) 18:17, 27 November 2010 (UTC)
Northern Tavaria
- Northern Tavaria · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) ·
Sorry if this is the wrong page or process, but the above link seems to have been merged with "Crimea", but I can find no reference to Northern Tavaria in that article or Wiki, or anywhere on Google. I would just like to find information about Northern Tavaria, say perhaps what was in the original article. Thanks. -119.224.58.123 (talk) 17:53, 27 November 2010 (UTC)
- Apparently the only revision at Northern Tavria is the creation of the redirect so there is nothing else there. Spartaz 18:05, 27 November 2010 (UTC)
Just Ines
This 2010 UK film is now written about quite extensively in several print magazines, including Variety and Screen Daily. -ᴳᴿᴲᴳᴼᴿᴵᴷ☺ᶤᶯᵈᶸᶩᶢᵉ 19:11, 27 November 2010 (UTC)
- Not done. This article was deleted as a result of the deletion discussion at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Just Ines so, as stated at the top of this page, it cannot be undeleted here. If you consider that there is new information, you should first approach user Ron Ritzman (talk · contribs), the admin who closed the discussion; then, if you are not satisfied, you can take it to WP:Deletion review. JohnCD (talk) 21:34, 27 November 2010 (UTC)
mark b. newbauer
I wanted to participate in the review; however was out of town-- all of the information in the article can be substantiated and the company, Mike the Pike Productions, has been featured in 'Variety', 'Hollywood Reporter', on George R.R. Martin's blog, blogged by the author himself, etc.- I would like to get this considered for undeletion as, I simply need instructions as to how to source as all sources can be provided and I want to be respectful of Misplaced Pages's guidelines and standards. -Filmphile (talk) 22:21, 27 November 2010 (UTC)
- Not done. This article was deleted as a result of the deletion discussion at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Mark B. Newbauer so, as stated at the top of this page, it cannot be undeleted here. If you consider that the discussion was not correctly closed, or that there is new information, you should first approach user Cirt (talk · contribs), the admin who closed the discussion; then, if you are not satisfied, you can take it to WP:Deletion review. JohnCD (talk) 22:24, 27 November 2010 (UTC)
Landcert
I created the name "LandCert" which is a registered trademark (Reg.No. 3,770,170) to establish an new ontology for evaluating land. --MSH1864 (talk) 02:52, 28 November 2010 (UTC)
- Not done The most recently deleted version consisted solely of "Landcert is a process of evaluating property utilizing mapping and municipal research." I'd suggest you spend some time carefully reading WP:FIRST, then make a version at a subpage of your userpage, such as at User:MSH1864/Landcert. That will give you more, but not unlimited, time to get it ready for article space. HTH --Fabrictramp | talk to me 03:34, 28 November 2010 (UTC)
GLKEDIA
reasoning -Odishagroup (talk) 06:46, 28 November 2010 (UTC)
- Not done - this page is a copyright violation of http://www.glkedia.com/about.html. Airplaneman ✈ 07:33, 28 November 2010 (UTC)
- It is total idleness on the part of Odishagroup to simply copy their web page and think they have created a Misplaced Pages article. A complete re-write would be needed anyway. And why on earth did you give it that strange, SHOUTED title when the guy is called Giridharilal Kedia? — ] (talk · contribs) 19:07, 28 November 2010 (UTC)
Tony Mars
Entry needs to be updated and expanded not deleted in order to meet Wiki Bio requirements. -74.87.123.162 (talk) 07:48, 28 November 2010 (UTC)
- Not done - As announced prominently at the top of the page, this process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially and has no applicability to articles deleted after any deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Tony Mars, it cannot be undeleted through this process. Nevertheless, if you believe that the consensus found at the discussion was in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user Bigtimepeace (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review.--Tikiwont (talk) 10:10, 28 November 2010 (UTC)
bitcoin
its more relevant than 90% of th crap articles on here -24.47.43.189 (talk) 11:55, 28 November 2010 (UTC)
- Not done You obviously came here to attempt to make a disruptive point rather than make a legitimate request and are well aware that this was deleted at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Bitcoin and will not be acted upon, so I'll dispense with the standard response to users who make such requests in good faith.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 12:24, 28 November 2010 (UTC)
- You are acting uncivil by responding to him this way. You should NOT jump to accusations of bad faith WP:AOBF. The user is simply upset and unfamiliar with Misplaced Pages policies. While long-time Wikipedians know that his argument is not one accepted, "most of the articles here are crap" is a common public conception. Rather than respond to an inappropriate request with an inappropriate retort, you should calmly and politely inform the user of how things work around here 67.174.39.160 (talk) 06:19, 30 November 2010 (UTC)
- Wrong, wrong and wrong. Unfortunately, it's hard to gauge knowledge and skill level from anonymous editors, and the message in the statement was pure bad faith - it could be read no other way. If one thinks that articles are crap you do one of two things: go away, or fix them. (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 11:58, 30 November 2010 (UTC)
- You are acting uncivil by responding to him this way. You should NOT jump to accusations of bad faith WP:AOBF. The user is simply upset and unfamiliar with Misplaced Pages policies. While long-time Wikipedians know that his argument is not one accepted, "most of the articles here are crap" is a common public conception. Rather than respond to an inappropriate request with an inappropriate retort, you should calmly and politely inform the user of how things work around here 67.174.39.160 (talk) 06:19, 30 November 2010 (UTC)
- Indeed. The message is antagonistic on its face. We do not assume good faith in the presence of contrary evidence.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 13:24, 30 November 2010 (UTC)
La Paz
Some information about the city has recently been improperly deleted and altered. This site is a serious source of informaton and not of mockery. The entry "San Francisco Church is an ancient church where San Francisco is buried" is totally absurd. Saint Francis (San Francisco) is obviously not buried in La Paz,Bolivia The person who wrote that, deleted a t the same time some real facts. Can you undo the changes and leave the article as it was about a month ago? -69.171.176.178 (talk) 13:34, 28 November 2010 (UTC)
- I've corrected the passage. Nevertheless it is longer around than you think and if you feel other content needs to be changed, you best do it yourself, maybe checking the page history once more. This page here is only for case where the whole page has been deleted and cannot be edited anymore.--Tikiwont (talk) 13:52, 28 November 2010 (UTC)
Hannu Rajaniemi
This article about a science fiction author was apparently deleted because prior to the September 2010 publication of his first novel The Quantum Thief his notability was uncertain. Now that the book has been published, creating something of a buzz, I think the article, a version of which is available here, should be restored. -Victor Chmara (talk) 18:14, 28 November 2010 (UTC)
- Done, in a manner of speaking. As a contested proposed deletion, the article can be immediately restored upon request. Rather than having me undelete it, you should use User:Abc10/Hannu_Rajaniemi. Leave a note at User_talk:Abc10 asking them to move it back to articlespace, if they don't respond in a few days you can move if back yourself. If you don't want to move it, make another comment here or talk to me on my talk page and I can move it for you. Protonk (talk) 18:21, 28 November 2010 (UTC)
kolotube
This article was deleted because i recreated and submitted it without any references, i plan on taking my time in recreating this article if given a second chance, to make sure all requirements are fulfilled -B0ssman89E (talk) 20:48, 28 November 2010 (UTC)
- Not done Feel free to make a WP:Userspace draft because an unreferenced, possibly non-notable article cannot exist in this manner. (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 21:22, 28 November 2010 (UTC)
bitcoin, again
I want to know more about it and it is not illegal. -222.154.234.89 (talk) 02:08, 29 November 2010 (UTC)
- It was deleted by consensus at AfD and salted by JohnCD (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA), meaning there is nothing we can do on this page. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 02:37, 29 November 2010 (UTC)
- It is not illegal, but despite two deletion reviews, nobody has yet produced evidence that it is notable enough to have an article. See Misplaced Pages:Deletion review/Log/2010 September 26. There is a draft article at Misplaced Pages:Article Incubator/Bitcoin. JohnCD (talk) 10:53, 29 November 2010 (UTC)
File:Afterjesus.jpg
- File:Afterjesus.jpg · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) ·
I'm not necessarily requesting undeletion, I'm just trying to discover what happened to it. There was a photo of King of Kings (statue) at this filename, used in the article, showing the appearance of this sculpture following a fire. The photo isn't there any more, and there doesn't seem to be any deletion log or note that it was deleted for whatever reason, at least not that I can find. If it was moved, there's no redirect, and the article that pointed to it wasn't updated. A search isn't turning up any deletion discussion, so if it was deleted, it was probably speedy or prodded. Thanks, cmadler (talk) 10:06, 29 November 2010 (UTC) -cmadler (talk) 10:06, 29 November 2010 (UTC)
- Are you sure the photo was not at Commons? I see no history under that filename at all. (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 10:41, 29 November 2010 (UTC)
- The file was deleted at Commons, as shown here.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 13:42, 29 November 2010 (UTC)
Pragmatic Buddhism
The current search for Pragmatic Buddhism leads to the Center of Pragmatic Buddhism -Adartsug (talk) 12:42, 29 November 2010 (UTC)
I do not have a clue on why the page was deleted. The article had contributions from many people.
- It was not deleted. The title, along with its entire editing history was moved to the new title (the prior title is now a redirect). What may have confused you is that, as can be seen in that edit history, the page was vastly shortened at about the same time, on the stated basis: "starting to fix the many problems with this article, which is arguably OR/Synthesis in its entirety" ("OR" is an abbreviation used here for original research; see Misplaced Pages:No original research).--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 13:26, 29 November 2010 (UTC)
I, Adartsug, originally wrote the item on Pragmatic Buddhism. I do not belong to any school or branch of Religious Buddhism; I have never been in a Buddhist temple or pagoda. I consider that there is a strong stream today toward Pragmatic Buddhism (or secular, or non-religious, or even agnostic) and Misplaced Pages should have an article on that trend. You should have not removed the whole entry but I agree that the self-promoting links should not be there.
I have no connection with either the Center of Pragmatic Buddhism or the Unfettered Mind organization. They included their links by their own initiative; I added the section “Organizations” to make room for the first group.
Buddhism is referred as pragmatic by scholars and writers¬ such as Edward Conze, Richard P. Hayes and Stephen Batchelor, and atheistic or agnostic by André Comte-Sponville. As a notion, Pragmatic Buddhism is as “cloudy” as agnosticism or pragmatism; the schools on these “philosophies” appeared much later than the words.
Lateral to the central issue and even stranger than your deletion of the article in question is the book I just found in Amazon.com PRAGMATIC BUDDHISM, the summary of which I copy next: “High Quality Content by[REDACTED] articles! Pragmatic Buddhism is a subset of the Buddhist doctrine which leaves aside metaphysical beliefs and rituals of any kind and advocates the continuous practice of the Buddha's Teachings (Dhamma in Pali, Dharma in Sanskrit) with the primary purpose of eliminating suffering and bringing about inner peace and harmony. In the broadest sense of the word, Buddhism is a religion and a philosophical system originally proposed by Siddhattha Gotama (in Pali; Siddhartha Gautama in Sanskrit), the Buddha, in northeastern India in the sixth century B.C. As a religion, the fourth largest in the world, it has three main schools (Theravada, Mahayana, Vajrayana) and dozens of derivate branches. For the strong emphasis it places in introspection and mind states, numerous scholars also consider Buddhism a system of psychology rather than (or in addition to) a religious creed or a school of philosophy.” Are people actually taken material from Misplaced Pages to produce books? Adartsug, November 30, 2010
- There are several issues here. First, there is no plural 'you'. As you created the artcile on one hand it was unilaterally first moved and then converted by one user, Sylvain1972 (talk · contribs), as also mentioned here. Second, it is still there in the history! If you disagree, you can simply undo the title move and restore the original content to allow for a wider discussion of its merits. That would also be the place to discuss the third issue regarding the source listed at amazon. (It seems to me they pasted a generic description.) If necessary, I could help you with the technicalities. Let me know here or on my talk page. --Tikiwont (talk) 16:43, 30 November 2010 (UTC)
http://en.wikipedia.org/User:PadovaniML/Dennis_Nackord
- Dennis Nackord · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) ·
It was originally deemed to be self-promoting, but I changed it to remove what I thought to be offending material. -PadovaniML (talk) 21:20, 29 November 2010 (UTC)
- Not done Nothing to undelete anymore. Please contact the admin who userfied it for you, Graeme Bartlett (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA), on a possible move back to mainspace. --Tikiwont (talk) 17:29, 30 November 2010 (UTC)
Caitlin Rose again
Because I have supplied the article with links which back up via evidence what the actual article says -Scottcampbell14 (talk) 23:29, 29 November 2010 (UTC)
- Not done A little higher up on this page you were advised that it would not be undeleted, but that you should recreate a new article from scratch with specific things in mind. I'm no Stanley Milgram, but sometimes I think it's better to do what you're told in cases like this. (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 11:49, 30 November 2010 (UTC)
Musulin, Stella von
- Musulin, Stella von · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) ·
Nowhere on the internet contains the information I have submitted on the writer Stella von Musulin. Yet it has been unfairly deleted. Here friendship with W H Auden would be enough to include her under 'noteable' but added to this is her important publications, her role in MI6 etc, yet it was seen fit to delete this article. This is utterly beyond all reasonable editing criteria and without justification. I request that the article be reinstated in the interests of scholarship. -Natsyw (talk) 10:44, 30 November 2010 (UTC)
- Not done Well, I searched for various versions of the article, and have yet to find anything. That said, "a friendship with" does not allow someone to inherit notability. Although we don't require all references to be available on the internet, there must be some valid reliable sources that you can help point us to - with millions of editors, someone must have access to a printed copy. We also don't do things "in the interest of scholarship" - this is an encylopedia of knowledge, not a compendium of scholarship. (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 11:44, 30 November 2010 (UTC)
- Bwilkins, if you'd checked his deleted contributions you'd have seen http://en.wikipedia.org/Special:Undelete/MUSULIN,_STELLA_von (also see User:Natsyw). I would restore it, but for Coren Searchbot flagging a potential copyvio before speedy deletion (though I can't confirm this flagging). I don't think that A7 applied, as being a biographer of Auden and a published author on Austria is a "credible claim of importance" (notability is another question entirely). A new, sourced and demonstratively non-plagiarised bio on Stella Musulin should not be speedily deletable, but I do doubt that she's notable from what I could find. Fences&Windows 22:30, 30 November 2010 (UTC)
- I have tried to help this user out, as they bungled some text into one of my watched articles. But, how ever well you shine the stuff that is on their own stub page, I can't find any suitable references in English or German that would enable this person to presently pass WP:NOTAB Rgds, --Trident13 (talk) 02:41, 1 December 2010 (UTC)
- Bwilkins, if you'd checked his deleted contributions you'd have seen http://en.wikipedia.org/Special:Undelete/MUSULIN,_STELLA_von (also see User:Natsyw). I would restore it, but for Coren Searchbot flagging a potential copyvio before speedy deletion (though I can't confirm this flagging). I don't think that A7 applied, as being a biographer of Auden and a published author on Austria is a "credible claim of importance" (notability is another question entirely). A new, sourced and demonstratively non-plagiarised bio on Stella Musulin should not be speedily deletable, but I do doubt that she's notable from what I could find. Fences&Windows 22:30, 30 November 2010 (UTC)
File:Södermalm.JPG
- File:Södermalm.JPG · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) ·
Poor transwiki, please restore the file description temporarily, I will correct the transfer and tag it for speedydeletion when finished. Thanks, -Martin H. (talk) 13:06, 30 November 2010 (UTC)
- Done --Tikiwont (talk) 18:06, 30 November 2010 (UTC)
Smart Distributed System
- Smart Distributed System · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) ·
Really? Honeywell is not a notable company? I am new to this, so I'm not suprised. But to call Honeywell not a notable company is to call a farce a process. -KazooOfTheNorth (talk) 17:13, 30 November 2010 (UTC)
- Well, I see you've meanwhile contacted the deleting admin. If you need futher help let me know.--Tikiwont (talk) 18:01, 30 November 2010 (UTC)
Meld (software)
Meld is one of the most popular open source visual diff and merge tool. It is not clear why its article has been deleted while similar articles describing less known tools (like tkdiff or Araxis Merge) exist. -134.83.1.241 (talk) 10:49, 1 December 2010 (UTC)
- Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. Courcelles 10:54, 1 December 2010 (UTC)
Euan McIver
I have been notified that this page, created by a Scottish Variety Club Member, has been deleted - one reason being - it seemed I only appeared in amateur productions - more than ten years with a national star (Stanley Baxter)and two national industry awards from the USA as listed, should convey the message that this is not the case, and while I undergo further treatment for the illness also mentioned in the article I am concentrating on assisting community theatre projects. It seems the administrator does not know the facts and is applying his own opinions. Please reconsider this deletion. -86.170.153.227 (talk) 13:34, 1 December 2010 (UTC)
- Not done - As also announced at the top of the page, this process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially and has no applicability to articles deleted after any deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Euan S McIver, it cannot be undeleted through this process. As you believe that the consensus found at the discussion was in error, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user Courcelles (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review.--Tikiwont (talk) 13:45, 1 December 2010 (UTC)
Basware
Hi, my companies Misplaced Pages page has been deleted by Airplaneman. A couple of times we have had our site edited with our competitor inserting their own company names into our page. I have always considered Misplaced Pages to be impartial and so I do not believe this is the readers interest. We do not use Misplaced Pages for promoting our business but rather as a point of reference. We are Basware, this is what we do. Anything beyond that as far as I am concerned is Marketing talk and not of interest to Misplaced Pages readers nor myself. Despite taking this approach I am still surprised that our pages are being marked as advertising. We are more than willing to rewrite content to make it useful to readers but it seems to be slowly eroded with and tampered by competitors. I hope that we can be undeleted and am happy to receive any comments or recommendations that you might have. Thanks and regards -Zmte055 (talk) 14:06, 1 December 2010 (UTC)
- The problem is that people like you are editing the article, removing information (such as who you compete against) in order to keep the article the way you want it. As a result, the article was so promotional (full of peacock words like "leading" and laden with promotional fluff) that it was deleted as an advertisement. Such is the consequence of conflict of interest editing. --Orange Mike | Talk 14:11, 1 December 2010 (UTC)
AGN International
Hi, an article that i created AGN International was deleted in October by Transporterman under section A7, I did put the 'hangon' quote on top of the page so that we can amend and change details so that the article no longer fell under A7 any longer. Unfortunately this article was then deleted. I contacted transporterman but have had no response from him. I also can not put this article back up with the amended changes, please can you advise how this can be done. — Preceding unsigned comment added by AmyGNorris (talk • contribs) 15:17, 1 December 2010 (UTC)
- Not done. This article has actually been deleted four times and eventually protected against re-creation. It has been the subject of a deletion discussion at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/AGN International so, as stated at the top of this page, it cannot be undeleted here. If you consider that the discussion was not correctly closed, or that there is new information, you should first approach user Ron Ritzman (talk · contribs), the administrator who closed the discussion; then, if you are not satisfied, you can take it to WP:Deletion review. If you are connected with the organization you should first read our guideline on WP:Conflict of interest, and the WP:FAQ/Organizations; Misplaced Pages is an encyclopedia, not a business listing directory. JohnCD (talk) 15:44, 1 December 2010 (UTC)
- (edit conflict)Amy, Transporterman responded to you within an hour, and left a message on your talk page informing you. You can see the response in the history of his/her talk page at . --Fabrictramp | talk to me 15:47, 1 December 2010 (UTC)
Valeri "Tiger" Lilov
- Valeri "Tiger" Lilov · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) ·
Dear Misplaced Pages contributors,
I am a chess fan and small contibutor to Misplaced Pages. A few months ago I made a major update to an article about a chess master and teacher who is very famous in my country, but because of different reasons, his Misplaced Pages page didn't exist and it has been deleted repeteadly. I was provided with a copy of the article in question which I reformatted and submitted for review. After that, the article was approved by Misplaced Pages contributors and put live on Misplaced Pages. Now, a few months later I received a message saying that since the article was previously deleted, it has been deleted again. My question is: Is there any way for this article to go Live again and who I may turn to, in order to request the article to be reviewed and reforematted even more if needed. Here is the link for the article in question - http://en.wikipedia.org/Valeri_%22Tiger%22_Lilov. Thank you for your assistance!
Sincerely,
Dejan Stoynov -Chesszorro (talk) 16:24, 1 December 2010 (UTC)
- Not done. This article has twice been the subject of deletion discussions at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Valeri Lilov and Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Valeri Lilov (2nd nomination) so, as stated at the top of this page, it cannot be restored here. If you think the latest discussion was wrongly closed, or that your revised article Valeri "Tiger" Lilov adequately met the objections raised there, you should approach Courcelles (talk · contribs), the admin who closed it; then, if you are not satisfied, you can go to WP:Deletion review. JohnCD (talk) 16:52, 1 December 2010 (UTC)
Karma:_A_Very_Twisted_Love_Story
No reasoning given. -24.90.232.208 (talk) 16:47, 1 December 2010 (UTC)
- Not done. This short film does not seem to meet the notability requirements of WP:Notability (films); the only distinction claimed is that it was nominated for (but presumably did not win) an award. In any case, the article was deleted as a result of a deletion discussion at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Karma: A Very Twisted Love Story so, as stated at the top of this page, it cannot be restored here. If you think the discussion was wrongly closed, or that there is more information, you should first approach Cirt (talk · contribs), the admin who closed it; then, if you are not satisfied, you can go to WP:Deletion review. JohnCD (talk) 16:59, 1 December 2010 (UTC)
http://deletionpedia.dbatley.com/search/?title=Prince_Mohammed_bin_Faisal_I_bin_Al_Hussein_El-Hashemite_(deleted_01_Aug_2008_at_23:59)
Deletion was groundless and without a justification or solid evidence to the claim. The information in the article is all true and correct and documents to verify this information can be requested upon request -109.105.236.170 (talk) 18:32, 1 December 2010 (UTC)
- Not done - As announced prominently at the top of the page, this process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially and has no applicability to articles deleted after any deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Prince Mohammed bin Faisal I bin Al Hussein El-Hashemite, it cannot be undeleted through this process. Nevertheless, if you believe that the consensus found at the discussion was in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user DGG (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 18:37, 1 December 2010 (UTC)
File:Gail_edwards_headshot_rdmedia.jpg
- Gail_edwards_headshot_rdmedia.jpg · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) ·
I guess I didn’t select the ‘appropriate license’ when I uploaded the picture. I didn't realize there was a problem until I visited the page and found it had been removed. I tried to reload the picture but received this warning: “A file identical to this file (File: Gail edwards headshot rdmedia.jpg) has previously been deleted. You should check that file's deletion history before proceeding to re-upload it.” I contacted http://webchat.freenode.net to help me with this and they said,"The easiest thing to do may be to ask an administrator if they would be willing to undelete the file so you can put the appropriate license on it." Can you help? Thanks, Robert -RustyWard (talk) 19:23, 1 December 2010 (UTC)
- Not done File was deleted at Commons. You'd need to speak to the Commons admin who deleted it there. There's nothing we can do here, this is a different website. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 19:49, 1 December 2010 (UTC)
Etherealization
Can someone please userfy this page for me? I'm really curious what it said. -AaronSw (talk) 20:23, 1 December 2010 (UTC)
- Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 20:48, 1 December 2010 (UTC)
Dead Frontier
The article was removed due to non-notability. I don't know the original contents of the old page, but I have created new content based on notable information, with proper sources as you can see on my page: User:WizTheDoc. -WizTheDoc (talk) 20:32, 1 December 2010 (UTC)
- Done, seems reasonable and appears good enough to avoid speedy deletion, so moved to mainspace (article was salted). HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 20:53, 1 December 2010 (UTC)
Supersmile
- Supersmile · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) ·
The Misplaced Pages page was detelete after we tried to update it. Supersmile is a popular at-home whitening line created by Dr. Irwin Smigel -72.248.75.120 (talk) 20:45, 1 December 2010 (UTC)
- Not done - this page was deleted in accordance with criterion for speedy deletion G11. If you believe that this decision was found in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, please contact the administrator who implemented the deletion request, user NawlinWiki (talk · contribs). If you have already done so, your concerns can be taken to deletion review. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 20:55, 1 December 2010 (UTC)
harmless harvest
- Harmless harvest · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) ·
reasoning -Dothewildthing (talk) 23:04, 1 December 2010 (UTC)
Please see our company info online www.harmlessharvest.com
I intend only to display our scientific research on[REDACTED] as we are on the breaking edge of the sustainable wild food and agricultural movement. I can't seem to find 5 minutes to edit this information in my user profile because it keeps getting flagged or deleted and I am honestly just trying to get the research and our references out there. I thought I could edit the page and submit it to[REDACTED] for approval within my user space. I am terribly confused and have been working on this for hours.
We have many legitimate affiliates and proven data to back up all the information I wish to post. If you can allow me to edit in my user space please let me know. I promise that we are honest people, enthusiastic about making positive changes in the way we eat and live as humans while learning to save our earth's vital ecosystems through diligent research. The information we have is unbiased and should be shared.
Not only do we have a scientific research but are about to launch a cultural initiative project with extremely well known performance and installation artists who are well affiliated worldwide.
Please advise on how to share our findings with your website? If I am to add research to a general search for the likes of CAMU CAMU or CUPUACU or Coconut Water for instance I need people to know I am a credible source and how can I do that if I am not given the time to even provide a 5 minute company history online?
- Not done and will not be done The article was a blatant advert. You can try drafting a neutral version, but please read this and this first. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 00:21, 2 December 2010 (UTC)
Tank Johnson Drummer
- Tank Johnson Drummer · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) ·
because it's me, and I need to know how why it was deleted, and how I can fix it. -Gsmythe (talk) 05:39, 2 December 2010 (UTC)
- Not done because you need to read WP:PROMO, WP:GNG, WP:AUTOBIO, and probably WP:BAND for starters. (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 09:55, 2 December 2010 (UTC)
paul bradley
-85.210.44.12 (talk) 14:31, 2 December 2010 (UTC)
- We have several "Paul Bradley" articles - click the blue link above. If you are concerned about another, deleted, one, please give its exact title. JohnCD (talk) 14:44, 2 December 2010 (UTC)
Elan (IIT Hyderabad)
Whatever was written in the article was true. I'm myself a student of IIT Hyderabad and a core member of the fest team. I request you to please undelete the page, or at least provide us with the text that was there in it. We will make sure that it adheres to[REDACTED] standards. -Abrambk (talk) 18:46, 2 December 2010 (UTC)
- Not done. This article was deleted as a result of a deletion discussion at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Elan (IIT Hyderabad) so, as stated at the top of this page, it cannot be undeleted here. If you consider that the discussion was not correctly closed, or that there is new information, you should first approach user Courcelles (talk), the admin who closed the discussion; then, if you are not satisfied, you can take it to WP:Deletion review; but note that being true is not enough - subjects for Misplaced Pages articles must also be notable. I will advise you on your talk page how to enable email so that I can send you a copy of the article. JohnCD (talk) 23:08, 2 December 2010 (UTC)
Flight Training Europe
No reasoning given. -212.145.130.186 (talk) 22:53, 2 December 2010 (UTC)
- Not done. This article was deleted as a result of a deletion discussion at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Flight Training Europe so, as stated at the top of this page, it cannot be undeleted here. If you consider that the discussion was not correctly closed, or that there is new information, you should first approach user Sandstein (talk), the admin who closed the discussion; then, if you are not satisfied, you can take it to WP:Deletion review. JohnCD (talk) 23:11, 2 December 2010 (UTC)
Flight Training Europe
This article was deleted on the basis that the company was not noteworthy, the page lacked reliable third party sources and hadn't been updated recently. I don't believe that the first (and chief) of these reasons is valid. Flight Training Europe (now FTEJerez) is a major player in the Aviation Industry. The first pilots to complete the new MPL licence trained at FTE () and went on to work for Flybe (who has strong ties with the school). It also trains pilots directly for Qatar and Emirates as well as having graduates leave to start with most major European carriers (mostly Ryanair, Flybe and recently 4 graduates to BA CityFlyer), GAPAN Scholarship students are sent to FTEJerez to complete their ATPL. It owns and operates 29 aircraft and 2 simulators, including an advanced 737-800 simulator. The Company has appeared regularly in industry news: ()(). The company also has a rich history as a BAE systems Flight Training School, which used to train BA Scholarship students at Prestwick. It was BAE that moved the operation to Jerez. Independent Sources for all of this are being sought by myself. I ask that the article is restored and allowed to be updated. If this is unacceptable, I ask that the article is restored to my userspace where I will edit and amend as necessary to get the article to an acceptable standard for Misplaced Pages. -212.145.130.186 (talk) 23:20, 2 December 2010 (UTC)
- Hello. The majority of your response tells me you haven't carefully looked at what this page is for and what can and cannot be undeleted through it (nor carefully read the response you received immediately above). Articles deleted at a deletion discussions on the merits, as this one was, are never undeleted through this process. Accordingly, even if you wrote the most compelling reasons imaginable for undeletion, it would not be acted upon. This page is only for undeletion of articles deleted uncontroversially. Please read the boldfaced message at the top of this page, expanded upon in explanatory text below that message. If you want to seek undeletion, the only places you can ask for it are at the talk page of the admin who deleted it, or at WP:DRV, as explained by JohnCD above.
However, you do ask at the end of your post for the content to be userfied so that you can work on it—that can be done through this page and I will gladly provide this content to you if you create an account. We do not userfy content to IP talk pages. Please see Misplaced Pages:Userfication#What cannot be userfied. Creating an account takes literally moments. Once you have done so, give a ping here and I or someone else will userfy the content. Cheers.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 00:03, 3 December 2010 (UTC)
File:Coat of arms of Western Sahara.png
- File:Coat of arms of Western Sahara.png · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) ·
needed for article, keeps being deleted because users remove this as the political entity's status is controversial. Any way we can protect it from being deleted a fifth time? -Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 03:04, 3 December 2010 (UTC)
David Berger (theologian)
needed for article, keeps being deleted because users remove this as the theologian entity's status is controversial. The article is relevant because author wrote more than five books and he was a professor in Rome at university. The article has references and enough text for a good article.Frank Marco (talk) 14:00, 3 December 2010 (UTC)
stella von musulin
Stella on Musulin I am at a total loss as to why this article has been deleted. I have provided references, citations etc. What exactly is required? Here is a distinguished writer and historian being ignored by you. Take a look a the piece of personal puff and crap on Pablo Ganguli (who?) There is a vast piece of self-serving rubbish on this nobody who was deported from Morocco by the Moroccan authorities. the site should be renamed Wikicrap.Natsyw (talk) 23:09, 3 December 2010 (UTC)
User talk:Dmitri1999
- User talk:Dmitri1999 · ( logs | history | links | watch ) ·
reasoning -http://www.dmitrimarkine.com (talk) 04:28, 4 December 2010 (UTC)
http://en.wikipedia.org/User:Dmitri1999
Was deleted for "advertising". This is my own little space and the only people who see this page is ME. There was no valid reason behind the deletion. I am extremely pissed right now to the point I am considering deleting all the contributions I've made. It's just bad how some can just come in to your own little page(not an article for god's sake) and just completely delete it!
- I've restored the page and blanked it. Notwithstanding the fact that it is your talk page, you may not use any[REDACTED] page as a personal advertisement. Misplaced Pages is not the place to host your cv. I can see in the history that you have added that material several times. Please don't. I'm also going to remind you that when you made contributions to[REDACTED] you irrevocably released them to the GFDL--you can't come back later and unilaterally delete them. so please don't try that either. Protonk (talk) 05:59, 4 December 2010 (UTC)