| Revision as of 17:18, 24 April 2011 editTreasuryTag (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users46,645 edits Creating deletion discussion page for Silence (Doctor Who). | Revision as of 17:20, 24 April 2011 edit undoTreasuryTag (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users46,645 edits →Silence (Doctor Who): ++Next edit → | ||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
| :{{la|Silence (Doctor Who)}} – (<includeonly>]</includeonly><noinclude>]</noinclude>) | :{{la|Silence (Doctor Who)}} – (<includeonly>]</includeonly><noinclude>]</noinclude>) | ||
| :({{Find sources|Silence (Doctor Who)}}) | :({{Find sources|Silence (Doctor Who)}}) | ||
| Completely unreferenced pile of speculation and original research without the vaguest hint of notability. I am <u>really shocked</u> to find a sci-fi-related article in this sort of state...<br>Meanwhile, {{user|SarekOfVulcan}} deleted the PROD-tag because the article "can easily be sourced" – not that they have done so, and I anyway dispute that the drivelly original research contained within can be adequately referenced. Furthermore, Sarek 'forgot' to address the issue of notability. <font color="#FFB911">╟─]]►]─╢</font> 17:18, 24 April 2011 (UTC) | Completely unreferenced pile of speculation and original research without the vaguest hint of notability. I am <u>really shocked</u> to find a sci-fi-related article in this sort of state...<br>Meanwhile, {{user|SarekOfVulcan}} deleted the PROD-tag because the article "can easily be sourced" – not that they have done so, and I anyway dispute that the drivelly original research contained within can be adequately referenced. Furthermore, Sarek 'forgot' to address the issue of notability, also 'forgetting' to be responsible and add an {{tl|unreferenced}} tag. How unfortunate. <font color="#FFB911">╟─]]►]─╢</font> 17:18, 24 April 2011 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 17:20, 24 April 2011
Silence (Doctor Who)
- Silence (Doctor Who) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Completely unreferenced pile of speculation and original research without the vaguest hint of notability. I am really shocked to find a sci-fi-related article in this sort of state...
Meanwhile, SarekOfVulcan (talk · contribs) deleted the PROD-tag because the article "can easily be sourced" – not that they have done so, and I anyway dispute that the drivelly original research contained within can be adequately referenced. Furthermore, Sarek 'forgot' to address the issue of notability, also 'forgetting' to be responsible and add an {{unreferenced}} tag. How unfortunate. ╟─TreasuryTag►UK EYES ONLY─╢ 17:18, 24 April 2011 (UTC)