| Revision as of 17:41, 24 April 2011 editHyperdoctor Phrogghrus (talk | contribs)823 edits →Silence (Doctor Who): Keep as notable← Previous edit | Revision as of 17:43, 24 April 2011 edit undoTreasuryTag (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users46,645 edits →Silence (Doctor Who): cmNext edit → | ||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
| Completely unreferenced pile of speculation and original research without the vaguest hint of notability. I am <u>really shocked</u> to find a sci-fi-related article in this sort of state...<br>Meanwhile, {{user|SarekOfVulcan}} deleted the PROD-tag because the article "can easily be sourced" – not that they have done so, and I anyway dispute that the drivelly original research contained within can be adequately referenced. Furthermore, Sarek 'forgot' to address the issue of notability, also 'forgetting' to be responsible and add an {{tl|unreferenced}} tag. How unfortunate. <font color="#FFB911">╟─]]►]─╢</font> 17:18, 24 April 2011 (UTC) | Completely unreferenced pile of speculation and original research without the vaguest hint of notability. I am <u>really shocked</u> to find a sci-fi-related article in this sort of state...<br>Meanwhile, {{user|SarekOfVulcan}} deleted the PROD-tag because the article "can easily be sourced" – not that they have done so, and I anyway dispute that the drivelly original research contained within can be adequately referenced. Furthermore, Sarek 'forgot' to address the issue of notability, also 'forgetting' to be responsible and add an {{tl|unreferenced}} tag. How unfortunate. <font color="#FFB911">╟─]]►]─╢</font> 17:18, 24 April 2011 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Keep''' as notable. Some evidence already, as the fictional adversaries in the current story arc of a very popular television series, it seems reasonable to suppose that further evidence of notability will be forthcoming. The current state of the article is not an argument. Comments on the perceived inadquacies of other editors do not constitute deletion arguments. ] (]) 17:41, 24 April 2011 (UTC) | *'''Keep''' as notable. Some evidence already, as the fictional adversaries in the current story arc of a very popular television series, it seems reasonable to suppose that further evidence of notability will be forthcoming. The current state of the article is not an argument. Comments on the perceived inadquacies of other editors do not constitute deletion arguments. ] (]) 17:41, 24 April 2011 (UTC) | ||
| *:] – please point me towards ] containing significant coverage of this subject. <font color="#00ACF4">╟─]]►]─╢</font> 17:43, 24 April 2011 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 17:43, 24 April 2011
Silence (Doctor Who)
- Silence (Doctor Who) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Completely unreferenced pile of speculation and original research without the vaguest hint of notability. I am really shocked to find a sci-fi-related article in this sort of state...
Meanwhile, SarekOfVulcan (talk · contribs) deleted the PROD-tag because the article "can easily be sourced" – not that they have done so, and I anyway dispute that the drivelly original research contained within can be adequately referenced. Furthermore, Sarek 'forgot' to address the issue of notability, also 'forgetting' to be responsible and add an {{unreferenced}} tag. How unfortunate. ╟─TreasuryTag►UK EYES ONLY─╢ 17:18, 24 April 2011 (UTC)
- Keep as notable. Some evidence already, as the fictional adversaries in the current story arc of a very popular television series, it seems reasonable to suppose that further evidence of notability will be forthcoming. The current state of the article is not an argument. Comments on the perceived inadquacies of other editors do not constitute deletion arguments. Hyperdoctor Phrogghrus (talk) 17:41, 24 April 2011 (UTC)
- Classic fallacious argument – please point me towards third-party reliable sources containing significant coverage of this subject. ╟─TreasuryTag►collectorate─╢ 17:43, 24 April 2011 (UTC)