| Revision as of 01:44, 26 July 2011 editQrsdogg (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Pending changes reviewers6,586 edits →Hatten är din: reply← Previous edit | Revision as of 18:32, 26 July 2011 edit undoTomas e (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers74,567 edits →Hatten är din: Weak deleteNext edit → | ||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
| :<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the ]. <!--Template:Deletion sorting--></small> <small>— ] (]) 19:51, 24 July 2011 (UTC)</small> | :<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the ]. <!--Template:Deletion sorting--></small> <small>— ] (]) 19:51, 24 July 2011 (UTC)</small> | ||
| :<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the ]. <!--Template:Deletion sorting--></small> <small>— ] (]) 19:51, 24 July 2011 (UTC)</small> | :<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the ]. <!--Template:Deletion sorting--></small> <small>— ] (]) 19:51, 24 July 2011 (UTC)</small> | ||
| *'''Weak delete''' - I guess the basic question is if a Swedish internet meme can be notable. I would say "only with good referencing", and neither the English or the Swedish version of the article has this type of referencing. By the way, the English version of ], a similar form of "]", was deleted in 2009. ] (]) 18:32, 26 July 2011 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 18:32, 26 July 2011
Hatten är din
AfDs for this article:- Hatten är din (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Despite being saved during its first AfD, the article is not up to scratch. There are tags from 5 years ago which have clearly been ignored. It is not a known, notable, or (in)famous meme. There are citation concerns which I doubt will ever be resolved. I conclude that the article was barely notable before and should be considered for deletion now. doktorb words 14:48, 24 July 2011 (UTC)
- Keep. Hatten är din is indeed a known meme from its time; it is described on the website Know Your Meme and was the subject of reporting in the Swedish newspaper Aftonbladet; I have added that reference to the article. It was also treated as well-known at a 2002 conference on internet memes. --Chonak (talk) 19:43, 24 July 2011 (UTC)
- Note that Know Your Meme features user-generated content and is thus not a reliable source. Qrsdogg (talk) 16:41, 25 July 2011 (UTC)
- Thank you for the point. There is also site-generated content on KYM, namely the Know Your Meme video episodes. Could they count as a source? They do purport to be researched, and the episode on Phonetic Transcriptions cites Hatten är din as an example of soramimi and animutation (about 1:30-1:45 of the video). --Chonak (talk) 17:55, 25 July 2011 (UTC)
- Whether the videos that the staff produces are reliable or not is a bit of a grey area, I've heard editors opine in different directions on that. Use your best judgment, I guess. Qrsdogg (talk) 01:44, 26 July 2011 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 19:51, 24 July 2011 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 19:51, 24 July 2011 (UTC)
- Weak delete - I guess the basic question is if a Swedish internet meme can be notable. I would say "only with good referencing", and neither the English or the Swedish version of the article has this type of referencing. By the way, the English version of sv:Ansiktsburk, a similar form of "Turkhit", was deleted in 2009. Tomas e (talk) 18:32, 26 July 2011 (UTC)