| Revision as of 00:36, 6 September 2011 editEdwardsBot (talk | contribs)354,693 edits →The Signpost: 05 September 2011: new section← Previous edit | Revision as of 05:19, 6 September 2011 edit undoJim Sukwutput (talk | contribs)2,156 edits →Arb enforcement request concerning Wikifan12345: new sectionNext edit → | ||
| Line 88: | Line 88: | ||
| <div style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;">''']''' · ] · ] · ] (]) 00:36, 6 September 2011 (UTC)</div> | <div style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;">''']''' · ] · ] · ] (]) 00:36, 6 September 2011 (UTC)</div> | ||
| <!-- EdwardsBot 0168 --> | <!-- EdwardsBot 0168 --> | ||
| == Arb enforcement request concerning Wikifan12345 == | |||
| I made a request for ] regarding two reverts made in the article ]. Since ], you might be better suited to explain what happened during that case (which I am not familiar with). Thanks. <b><font color="gray">]]</font></b> 05:19, 6 September 2011 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 05:19, 6 September 2011
 Archives | ||||||||||||||||||
Index
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 31 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 4 sections are present. |
Kitten
Carolmooredc has given you a kitten! Kittens promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Kittens must be fed three times a day and will be your faithful companion forever! Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a kitten, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend.
Spread the goodness of kittens by adding {{subst:Kitten}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message, or kittynap their kitten with {{subst:Kittynap}}
A/E request
Hi Roland. I get an error screen when I try to view the second diff in your A/E request. You might want to double-check it. — Malik Shabazz /Stalk 18:37, 3 August 2011 (UTC)
- OK, corrected. Thanks. RolandR (talk) 19:08, 3 August 2011 (UTC)
- You also need to notify WF and add the notification diff to the request. nableezy - 19:35, 3 August 2011 (UTC)
August 2011
I really wish you had just answered my last message here. I was more than willing to listen and consider your perspective. But seeing as you aren't interested in dialog, I've referred your conduct to AE here.—Biosketch (talk) 19:56, 5 August 2011 (UTC)
Drork? ← ZScarpia 20:52, 5 August 2011 (UTC)
- Possibly. But I don't feel confident enough to submit an SPI. Do you? RolandR (talk) 21:12, 5 August 2011 (UTC)
- I'm going to take my time looking at the behavioural evidence. Wonder what the One-Man Sock Annihilating Machine, Nableezy, thinks? ← ZScarpia 23:15, 5 August 2011 (UTC)
The Signpost: 08 August 2011
- News and notes: Wikimania a success; board letter controversial; and evidence showing bitten newbies don't stay
- In the news: Israeli news focuses on Wikimania; worldwide coverage of contributor decline and gender gap; brief news
- WikiProject report: Shooting the breeze with WikiProject Firearms
- Featured content: The best of the week
- Arbitration report: Manipulation of BLPs case opened; one case comes to a close
- Technology report: Wikimania technology roundup; brief news
The Signpost: 15 August 2011
- Women and Misplaced Pages: New Research, WikiChix
- WikiProject report: The Oregonians
- Featured content: The best of the week
- Arbitration report: Abortion case opened, two more still in progress
- Technology report: Forks, upload slowness and mobile redirection
The Signpost: 22 August 2011
- News and notes: Girl Geeks edit while they dine, candidates needed for forthcoming steward elections, image referendum opens
- WikiProject report: Images in Motion – WikiProject Animation
- Featured content: JJ Harrison on avian photography
- Arbitration report: After eleven moves, name for islands now under arbitration
- Technology report: Engineering report, sprint, and more testers needed
The Signpost: 29 August 2011
- News and notes: Abuse filter on all Wikimedia sites; Foundation's report for July; editor survey results
- In the news: Misplaced Pages praised for disaster news coverage, scolded for left-wing bias; brief news
- Recent research: Article promotion by collaboration; deleted revisions; Misplaced Pages's use of open access; readers unimpressed by FAs; swine flu anxiety
- Opinion essay: How an attempt to answer one question turned into a quagmire
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Tennis
- Featured content: The best of the week
- Arbitration report: Four existing cases
- Technology report: The bugosphere, new mobile site and MediaWiki 1.18 close in on deployment
National Socialism has been a section of Types of socialism since 2008, why did you blank the section?
your revert has has blanked a section which has been discussed in talk, yet not by yourself, or the original blanker. please give your reason in talk. Darkstar1st (talk) 11:14, 31 August 2011 (UTC)
- btw, the guy who blanked the section, whose edit you restored, was also one of the section authors, odd, huh? "I touched up the Nazism and Fascism paragraphs to more clearly differentiate between those ideologies and traditional socialist ideas (without adding point of view). I also fixed up the writing style so it flows better (such as deleting unnecessary words and moving sentences to more appropriate paragraphs).Spylab 16:57, 1 September 2006 (UTC)Spylab" Darkstar1st (talk) 11:19, 31 August 2011 (UTC)
- It's simple. Whatever you say, Nazism is not, and never has been, a type of socialism. RolandR (talk) 11:20, 31 August 2011 (UTC)
- if you are making a massive deletion which has been in the article for years, please make a note in talk explaining why, the discussion goes back 5 years. Darkstar1st (talk) 11:27, 31 August 2011 (UTC)
- 2nd request for comment in discussion after you again blanked the entire section. the reason you were undone last time was you didn't explain your massive edit. it is highly irregular to remove 5000+ letters that have been there for years, without citing a policy. Darkstar1st (talk) 12:25, 1 September 2011 (UTC)
- if you are making a massive deletion which has been in the article for years, please make a note in talk explaining why, the discussion goes back 5 years. Darkstar1st (talk) 11:27, 31 August 2011 (UTC)
- It's simple. Whatever you say, Nazism is not, and never has been, a type of socialism. RolandR (talk) 11:20, 31 August 2011 (UTC)
The Signpost: 05 September 2011
- News and notes: 24,000 votes later and community position on image filter still unclear; first index of editor satisfaction appears positive
- WikiProject report: Riding with WikiProject London Transport
- Sister projects: Wiki Loves Monuments 2011
- Featured content: The best of the week
- Opinion essay: The copyright crisis, and why we should care
- Arbitration report: BLP case closed; Cirt-Jayen466 nearly there; AUSC reshuffle
- Technology report: Pencils down in Google Summer of Code, August analysed and integrated HTTPS support in action
Arb enforcement request concerning Wikifan12345
I made a request for Arb-com enforcement on Wikifan12345 regarding two reverts made in the article Gaza flotilla raid. Since you reported a very similar incident a few weeks ago, you might be better suited to explain what happened during that case (which I am not familiar with). Thanks. JimSukwutput 05:19, 6 September 2011 (UTC)