| Revision as of 16:24, 19 December 2011 editHairyWombat (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users6,860 editsm Corrected closure result← Previous edit | Revision as of 17:44, 14 February 2022 edit undoMalnadachBot (talk | contribs)11,637,095 editsm Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)Tag: AWBNext edit → | ||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
| Contested PROD. Concern was: Does not meet notability requirements, see ] ] (]) 02:33, 9 December 2011 (UTC) | Contested PROD. Concern was: Does not meet notability requirements, see ] ] (]) 02:33, 9 December 2011 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Delete:''' per ]. ] neologism created by ] musician. ] seems appropriate. ] <small>(])</small> 02:55, 9 December 2011 (UTC) | *'''Delete:''' per ]. ] neologism created by ] musician. ] seems appropriate. ] <small>(])</small> 02:55, 9 December 2011 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Delete''' No reliable sources discuss this musical "sub-genre" supposedly created by a non-notable teenage musician. ] ] 03:20, 9 December 2011 (UTC) | *'''Delete''' No reliable sources discuss this musical "sub-genre" supposedly created by a non-notable teenage musician. ] ] 03:20, 9 December 2011 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Strong delete'''. Either a hoax or might as well be. Search on Runtry + "Angus Gill" returns exactly one ghit: this article. --] (]) 03:25, 9 December 2011 (UTC) | *'''Strong delete'''. Either a hoax or might as well be. Search on Runtry + "Angus Gill" returns exactly one ghit: this article. --] (]) 03:25, 9 December 2011 (UTC) | ||
| Line 23: | Line 23: | ||
| *'''Delete''' based upon Cullen328's explanation. ] (]) 22:42, 14 December 2011 (UTC) | *'''Delete''' based upon Cullen328's explanation. ] (]) 22:42, 14 December 2011 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Strong delete''' This is just nonsense. ] (]) 17:23, 18 December 2011 (UTC) | *'''Strong delete''' This is just nonsense. ] (]) 17:23, 18 December 2011 (UTC) | ||
| :''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's ] or in a ]). No further edits should be made to this page. <!--Template:Afd bottom--></div> | :''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's ] or in a ]). No further edits should be made to this page.'' <!--Template:Afd bottom--></div> | ||
Revision as of 17:44, 14 February 2022
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete. TigerShark (talk) 22:31, 18 December 2011 (UTC)
Runtry
- Runtry (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Contested PROD. Concern was: Does not meet notability requirements, see WP:FIRST Eeekster (talk) 02:33, 9 December 2011 (UTC)
- Delete: per WP:NFT. WP:NN neologism created by WP:NN musician. WP:SNOW seems appropriate. Toddst1 (talk) 02:55, 9 December 2011 (UTC)
- Delete No reliable sources discuss this musical "sub-genre" supposedly created by a non-notable teenage musician. Cullen Let's discuss it 03:20, 9 December 2011 (UTC)
- Strong delete. Either a hoax or might as well be. Search on Runtry + "Angus Gill" returns exactly one ghit: this article. --Hobbes Goodyear (talk) 03:25, 9 December 2011 (UTC)
- Delete in accord with my earlier proposed deletion; Does not meet notability requirements, see WP:FIRST Chzz ► 05:39, 9 December 2011 (UTC)
- Delete, made up at school one day. JIP | Talk 06:24, 9 December 2011 (UTC)
- Delete, WP:NEO, no reliable sources, just a few forums making up words from Rap and cOUNTRY, along with CROCK for Country and ROCK. Not too good, eh? Chiswick Chap (talk) 09:19, 9 December 2011 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:23, 9 December 2011 (UTC)
- Strong delete, violates WP:V. --Kinu /c 20:51, 9 December 2011 (UTC)
- Delete: Per nom. HairyWombat 05:11, 10 December 2011 (UTC)
- Delete. Would also refer to WP:SNOW. --Legis (talk - contribs) 04:48, 11 December 2011 (UTC)
- Delete based upon Cullen328's explanation. Folgertat (talk) 22:42, 14 December 2011 (UTC)
- Strong delete This is just nonsense. Bazonka (talk) 17:23, 18 December 2011 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.