| Revision as of 15:58, 15 April 2012 editDennis Brown (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, IP block exemptions69,230 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 16:13, 15 April 2012 edit undoElen of the Roads (talk | contribs)16,638 edits →Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments: yesNext edit → | ||
| Line 61: | Line 61: | ||
| ======<span style="font-size:150%">Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments</span>====== | ======<span style="font-size:150%">Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments</span>====== | ||
| {{confirmed}}. Editing pattern is interesting. --] (]) 16:13, 15 April 2012 (UTC) | |||
| ---- | ---- | ||
| <!--- All comments go ABOVE this line, please. --> | <!--- All comments go ABOVE this line, please. --> | ||
Revision as of 16:13, 15 April 2012
Rinpoche
Rinpoche (talk · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
Populated account categories: confirmed · suspected
For archived investigations, see Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations/Rinpoche/Archive.
A long-term abuse case exists at Misplaced Pages:Long-term abuse/Rinpoche.
– A user has requested CheckUser. An SPI clerk will shortly look at the case and endorse or decline the request.
10 April 2012
- Suspected sockpuppets
- RUCloseYet? (talk · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- LHirsig (talk · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
Subsequent to RobvanderWaal's block yesterday per the previous investigation, this account shows up. User:RUCloseYet? showed up to the Major depressive disorder article and immediately implemented the change Rinpoche was trying to argue (under various accounts). His only previous activity occurred during the period between Skirtopodes' block and the beginning of RvdW's activity.
I know it's not exactly flawless scientific method, but I'm also always suspicious of accounts whose first edit is to create their own userpage. Could someone take a look please? Basalisk ⁄berate 08:37, 10 April 2012 (UTC)
:I agree with the above - it's an amazing coincidence that a newbie came up with this image File:Vincent van Gogh - Sorrow (F929).jpg that did not exist anywhere in[REDACTED] except the newbie located it. I just placed it here by the way: Drawings, water-colours and prints by Vincent van Gogh...Modernist (talk) 12:02, 10 April 2012 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Updated on 13/4/2012. I'm adding User:LHirsig to the investigation based on behavioural evidence. As one example, see this diff in the same discussion. The writing style and arguments are identical to Skirtopodes. Basalisk ⁄berate 23:02, 12 April 2012 (UTC)
*Could've fooled me - in my experience with all 3 editors - Rinpoche, Skirtopedes and RobvanderWaal; I found Rob to be far more polite and reasonable; I'm surprised that he also went to complain about major depressive disorder - I was attacked by them as well for describing the painting as despair in the van Gogh article...Modernist (talk) 12:02, 10 April 2012 (UTC)
Comments by other users
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
*I hope RobvanderWaal turns out to not be a sockpuppet of the other 2...Modernist (talk) 12:05, 10 April 2012 (UTC)
Having thought about this for a while Rob has a decidedly different persona than the other 2; I doubt they are the same person...Modernist (talk) 15:09, 11 April 2012 (UTC)
Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
Thought this had been hanging around for long enough.
LHirsig is 
Confirmed as User:Skirtopodes, which makes him a sock of Rinpoche.
And I have two more Confirmed socks of Skirtopodes,
JemimaWales (talk · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki) (already blocked by Risker back in Feb)
LornaDooneBlackmore (talk · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
RUCloseYet? is 
Likely on checkuser and 
Sounds like a duck quacking into a megaphone to me, so I think time can be called on this account.--Elen of the Roads (talk) 00:19, 15 April 2012 (UTC)
– This SPI case is open.
15 April 2012
- Suspected sockpuppets
- AnotherWeeWilly (talk · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
user pages of one sock, and their own . Plus comments on my talk page. . There really is no effort to hide the fact that they are sockpuppets going on. Dennis Brown (talk) 15:58, 15 April 2012 (UTC)
Comments by other users
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
Confirmed. Editing pattern is interesting. --Elen of the Roads (talk) 16:13, 15 April 2012 (UTC)
Categories: