User talk:Timotheus Canens/Archives/2012/5: Difference between revisions

< User talk:Timotheus Canens | Archives | 2012 Browse history interactively ← Previous edit Next edit →Content deleted Content addedVisual WikitextInline

Revision as of 20:00, 19 May 2012 view sourceMiszaBot III (talk \| contribs)597,462 editsm Archiving 1 thread(s) from User talk:Timotheus Canens.← Previous edit		Revision as of 20:22, 22 May 2012 view source MiszaBot III (talk \| contribs)597,462 editsm Archiving 1 thread(s) from User talk:Timotheus Canens.Next edit →
Line 67:		Line 67:
	</div>		</div>
	<!-- EdwardsBot 0269 -->		<!-- EdwardsBot 0269 -->
			== AFC move to salted page ==

			Can you please move ] to ]?<tt> </tt>] ] ] 02:16, 15 May 2012 (UTC)
			:I actually made a request for unprotection .<tt> </tt>] ] ] 02:20, 15 May 2012 (UTC)
			::Replied there. ] (]) 02:38, 15 May 2012 (UTC)
			:::Replied. I do think that secondary sources are currently on the short side; however, the article is written from a neutral point of view and could suffer from systematic bias. A search for the Persian افرانت does reveal more results than the English Afranet.<tt> </tt>] ] ] 03:14, 15 May 2012 (UTC)
			::::The editor, ], posted on his talk page with other references. After he includes the material, he will want to submit again. Other editors seemed to comment that the only way it could be created now would be to take it to ]; however, after looking through the instructions, it seems that deletion review would be inappropriate. When I read it, it appeared like deletion review was only for restoring deleted content. What should I tell the editor to assist him?<tt> </tt>] ] ] 14:36, 18 May 2012 (UTC)

Revision as of 20:22, 22 May 2012

This is an archive of past discussions with User talk:Timotheus Canens/Archives/2012. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

The Signpost: 30 April 2012

Paid editing: Does Misplaced Pages Pay? The Consultant: Pete Forsyth

News and notes: Showdown as featured article writer openly solicits commercial opportunities

Recent research: Barnstars work; Wiktionary assessed; cleanup tags counted; finding expert admins; discussion peaks; Misplaced Pages citations in academic publications; and more

Discussion report: 'ReferenceTooltips' by default

WikiProject report: The Cartographers of WikiProject Maps

Featured content: Featured content spreads its wings

Arbitration report: R&I Review remains in voting, two open cases

Technology report: What Git means for end users, design controversies and pertinent poll results

Aaack

Thanks. I'm evidently not really great with details, even if my intentions are good. --Floquenbeam (talk) 00:20, 2 May 2012 (UTC)

Input request

Hi Timotheus, could I please request your input at Misplaced Pages:Deletion review/Log/2012 May 4? I'm contacting you because it's a deletion review involving Chinese-language sources. All the best—S Marshall T/C 16:52, 5 May 2012 (UTC)

Hello, Timotheus Canens/Archives/2012. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

ViSalus Article

I have been going through and seeing if there are articles that were proposed for deletion that I could possibly save and came across ViSalus. I see that there was a lengthy discussion about the article prior to it being deleted (looks like you were the one who banged the final gavel after the discussion was over). I have done some more research on this company and it looks like it is more notable than the original editor was able to cite. I am wondering if there is anything specific about the original article that needs improvement and if you can provide me with an archive of the original article to work from. Thanks in advance. --Morning277 (talk) 12:14, 3 May 2012 (UTC)

Userfied to User:Morning277/ViSalus. You'd probably want to improve on it in your userspace and then get a review at WP:DRV. T. Canens (talk) 01:34, 5 May 2012 (UTC)

Thank You! I have also had a request HERE for a couple of days. I am not sure who to contact to have this reviewed. Any assistance that you may be able to provide would be appreciated. I apologize for continuously bugging you but I did not think this was something for the Admin Notice Board. --Morning277 (talk) 15:37, 6 May 2012 (UTC)

The Signpost: 07 May 2012

Paid editing: Does Misplaced Pages Pay? The Communicator: Phil Gomes

News and notes: Hong Kong to host Wikimania 2013

In the news: What does Misplaced Pages call an expert; and untruths in biographies ... again.

WikiProject report: Say What?: WikiProject Languages

Featured content: This week at featured content: How much wood would a Wood Duck chuck if a Wood Duck could chuck wood?

Arbitration report: Proposed decision in Rich Farmbrough, two open cases

Technology report: Search gets faster, GSoC gets more detail and 1.20wmf2 gets deployed

Deletion request

Hi, I see you are admin. I want User talk:NGC 2736/common.js, User:NGC 2736/common.js, User talk:NGC 2736/huggle.css, User:NGC 2736/huggle.css, User:NGC 2736/vector.js, User:NGC 2736/monobook.js, User:NGC 2736/twinkleoptions.js be deleted. I tried to add the CSD tag (db-user) to these pages, but what I can see is that the CSD tag does not work in these pages. So I am requesting you to delete these pages. Thank you! --NGC 2736 (talk) 07:57, 10 May 2012 (UTC)

Actually, the template won't expand, but it will actually put them into the correct speedy deletion category, so it will still be seen and deleted. Anyway,

Done. T. Canens (talk) 08:01, 10 May 2012 (UTC)

Thanks! --NGC 2736 (talk) 08:03, 10 May 2012 (UTC)

DeFacto socks

I see that you mentioned the possibility of a range block. 94.197.49.214 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) is the latest. - David Biddulph (talk) 15:53, 10 May 2012 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	Good catch here. Pine 07:10, 14 May 2012 (UTC)

The Signpost: 14 May 2012

Special report: Wikimedia and the "seismic shift" towards open-access research publication

News and notes: Finance debate drags on as editor survey finds Misplaced Pages too bureaucratic

WikiProject report: Welcome to Misplaced Pages with a cup of tea and all your questions answered - at the Teahouse

Featured content: Featured content is red hot this week

Arbitration report: R&I Review closed, Rich Farmbrough near closure

Technology report: Cross-wiki watchlist controversy; and is "go file a bug" really a useful response?

AFC move to salted page

Can you please move Misplaced Pages talk:Articles for creation/Afranet to Afranet? Ryan Vesey Review me! 02:16, 15 May 2012 (UTC)

I actually made a request for unprotection here. Ryan Vesey Review me! 02:20, 15 May 2012 (UTC)

Replied there. T. Canens (talk) 02:38, 15 May 2012 (UTC)

Replied. I do think that secondary sources are currently on the short side; however, the article is written from a neutral point of view and could suffer from systematic bias. A search for the Persian افرانت does reveal more results than the English Afranet. Ryan Vesey Review me! 03:14, 15 May 2012 (UTC)

The editor, User:ChazzI73, posted on his talk page with other references. After he includes the material, he will want to submit again. Other editors seemed to comment that the only way it could be created now would be to take it to WP:DRV; however, after looking through the instructions, it seems that deletion review would be inappropriate. When I read it, it appeared like deletion review was only for restoring deleted content. What should I tell the editor to assist him? Ryan Vesey Review me! 14:36, 18 May 2012 (UTC)