| Revision as of 18:09, 1 July 2012 editSean.hoyland (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Rollbackers34,758 edits Arbitration enforcement← Previous edit | Revision as of 06:45, 2 July 2012 edit undoTimotheus Canens (talk | contribs)Edit filter managers, Administrators38,438 edits You have been blocked from editing for violating an arbitration decision with your edits. (TW)Next edit → | ||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
| ==Arbitration enforcement== | ==Arbitration enforcement== | ||
| Please see ] and add any comments you would like to make. <small style="border: 1px solid;padding:1px 4px 1px 3px;white-space:nowrap">''']''' - ''']'''</small> 18:09, 1 July 2012 (UTC) | Please see ] and add any comments you would like to make. <small style="border: 1px solid;padding:1px 4px 1px 3px;white-space:nowrap">''']''' - ''']'''</small> 18:09, 1 July 2012 (UTC) | ||
| == July 2012 == | |||
| <div class="user-block" style="min-height: 40px"> ] To enforce an ] decision, you have been ''']''' from editing for a period of '''2 weeks'''. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to ]. If you believe this block is unjustified, please read the ] and follow the instructions there to appeal your block. ] (]) 06:45, 2 July 2012 (UTC) <hr/><p><small>'''Notice to administrators:''' In a <span class="plainlinks"></span>, the Committee held that "Administrators are prohibited from reversing or overturning (explicitly or in substance) any action taken by another administrator pursuant to the terms of an active arbitration remedy, and explicitly noted as being taken to enforce said remedy, except: (a) with the written authorization of the Committee, or (b) following a clear, substantial, and active consensus of uninvolved editors at a community discussion noticeboard (such as ] or ]). If consensus in such discussions is hard to judge or unclear, the parties should submit a request for clarification on the ]. Any administrator that overturns an enforcement action outside of these circumstances shall be subject to appropriate sanctions, up to and including desysopping, at the discretion of the Committee."</small></div><!-- Template:uw-aeblock --> | |||
| :''If this is a ], and you didn't make the edit, consider ] for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.''<!-- Template:Shared IP advice --> | |||
Revision as of 06:45, 2 July 2012
March 2012
Thank you for your interest in editing Misplaced Pages. Your edit on the page Diaspora was successful, but because it was not considered beneficial to the page, the edit has been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment with editing, please use the sandbox instead. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. SkyMachine 06:53, 25 March 2012 (UTC)
Arbitration enforcement
Please see Misplaced Pages:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement#99.237.115.11 and add any comments you would like to make. Sean.hoyland - talk 18:09, 1 July 2012 (UTC)
July 2012
Notice to administrators: In a March 2010 decision, the Committee held that "Administrators are prohibited from reversing or overturning (explicitly or in substance) any action taken by another administrator pursuant to the terms of an active arbitration remedy, and explicitly noted as being taken to enforce said remedy, except: (a) with the written authorization of the Committee, or (b) following a clear, substantial, and active consensus of uninvolved editors at a community discussion noticeboard (such as WP:AN or WP:ANI). If consensus in such discussions is hard to judge or unclear, the parties should submit a request for clarification on the proper page. Any administrator that overturns an enforcement action outside of these circumstances shall be subject to appropriate sanctions, up to and including desysopping, at the discretion of the Committee."
- If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.