| Revision as of 17:45, 25 July 2012 editZad68 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users20,355 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 10:47, 8 August 2012 edit undoJim1138 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers297,704 edits 3RR notice | ||
| Line 21: | Line 21: | ||
| <br /> | <br /> | ||
| Hi Valm, you only did one revert at ] but I'm still required to notify you that the edit-warring case has been filed. Although nobody broke the 3RR, what's happening there is definitely edit-warring. Have a good one... <code>]]</code> 17:45, 25 July 2012 (UTC) | Hi Valm, you only did one revert at ] but I'm still required to notify you that the edit-warring case has been filed. Although nobody broke the 3RR, what's happening there is definitely edit-warring. Have a good one... <code>]]</code> 17:45, 25 July 2012 (UTC) | ||
| ] Your recent editing history at ] shows that you are currently engaged in an ]. '''Being involved in an edit war can result in you being ]'''—especially if you violate the ], which states that an editor must not perform more than three ] on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—'''even if you don't violate the three-revert rule'''—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. | |||
| To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's ] to work toward making a version that represents ] among editors. See ] for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant ] or seek ]. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary ]. <!-- Template:uw-3rr --> ] (]) 10:47, 8 August 2012 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 10:47, 8 August 2012
Sockpuppetry case
|
Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations/Destinero for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. SarahStierch (talk) 20:46, 14 November 2011 (UTC)
Talking and editing
Hi Valm. Please take Misplaced Pages:Editing_policy#Talking_and_editing into consideration when making edits on LGBT parenting and other articles. Thanks, SarahStierch (talk) 15:04, 16 November 2011 (UTC)
Edit warring on LGBT parenting
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on LGBT parenting. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Please be particularly aware, Misplaced Pages's policy on edit warring states:
- Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made; that is to say, editors are not automatically "entitled" to three reverts.
- Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. AV3000 (talk) 15:23, 16 November 2011 (UTC)
Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Misplaced Pages's policy on edit warring. Thank you.
Hi Valm, you only did one revert at LGBT parenting but I'm still required to notify you that the edit-warring case has been filed. Although nobody broke the 3RR, what's happening there is definitely edit-warring. Have a good one... Zad68 17:45, 25 July 2012 (UTC)
Your recent editing history at LGBT parenting shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Jim1138 (talk) 10:47, 8 August 2012 (UTC)