Misplaced Pages

Talk:Yahoo News: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from[REDACTED] with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 23:16, 23 October 2012 editZappaOMatic (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers134,116 edits Adding WikiProject← Previous edit Revision as of 02:23, 11 November 2015 edit undo151.227.44.41 (talk) BiasNext edit →
Line 9: Line 9:


:I removed this link and the "Bias" subhead from the external links section. <font face="constantia">] ]</font> 04:14, 24 April 2009 (UTC) :I removed this link and the "Bias" subhead from the external links section. <font face="constantia">] ]</font> 04:14, 24 April 2009 (UTC)

The article should have a section on Yahoo's right wing bias. This can be supported by the list of sources that yahoo uk relies on for its news - SKY, Fox, Daily Mail, Metro (sister paper to the Daily Mail), Telegraph, Daily Express, the Spectator... and several sources of dubious origin. This ignores free left wing sources such as the Guardian and Daily Mirror and centralist sources such as the Independent and Channel 4 News... although on rare occasions if it supports Yahoo's editorial agenda, it will use the BBC. By and large, the majority of news stories tend to focus on the topics of immigration and race in a negative context, the EU in a negative context, ISIS and terrorism in the context of Islam and Muslims, Corbyn bashing, anti-SNP, and support of the Conservative party and UKIP. This is hardly surprising considering the sources that are predominantly drawn upon. As such the comment sections on Yahoo News UK frequently have racist, xenophobic, and far right viewpoints often in blatant breach of Yahoo's comment rules.

Revision as of 02:23, 11 November 2015

WikiProject iconJournalism Unassessed
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Journalism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of journalism on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JournalismWikipedia:WikiProject JournalismTemplate:WikiProject JournalismJournalism
???This article has not yet received a rating on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
???This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Add this to Yahoo! Article

Hi. I think that we should add this small article to the Yahoo! article, and create a new section with the name "Yahoo! News". Any comments? ɸSwannieɸ 19:27, 7 June 2007 (UTC)

Bias

Why does Yahoo News only post negative news about Hillary while only posting positive news about Obama? Hyacinth (talk) 01:23, 3 June 2008 (UTC)

I removed this link and the "Bias" subhead from the external links section. momoricks (make my day) 04:14, 24 April 2009 (UTC)

The article should have a section on Yahoo's right wing bias. This can be supported by the list of sources that yahoo uk relies on for its news - SKY, Fox, Daily Mail, Metro (sister paper to the Daily Mail), Telegraph, Daily Express, the Spectator... and several sources of dubious origin. This ignores free left wing sources such as the Guardian and Daily Mirror and centralist sources such as the Independent and Channel 4 News... although on rare occasions if it supports Yahoo's editorial agenda, it will use the BBC. By and large, the majority of news stories tend to focus on the topics of immigration and race in a negative context, the EU in a negative context, ISIS and terrorism in the context of Islam and Muslims, Corbyn bashing, anti-SNP, and support of the Conservative party and UKIP. This is hardly surprising considering the sources that are predominantly drawn upon. As such the comment sections on Yahoo News UK frequently have racist, xenophobic, and far right viewpoints often in blatant breach of Yahoo's comment rules.

Categories:
Talk:Yahoo News: Difference between revisions Add topic