| Revision as of 18:37, 6 November 2012 editReaper Eternal (talk | contribs)Edit filter managers, Checkusers, Administrators62,584 edits Comment, marking case as closed← Previous edit | Revision as of 18:46, 6 November 2012 edit undoSchroCat (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers113,728 edits →Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin commentsNext edit → | ||
| Line 27: | Line 27: | ||
| *{{clerk note}} Please do not make any blocks yet, as this appears to have been a collection of mistakes rather than abusive sockpuppetry. ] (]) 18:29, 6 November 2012 (UTC) | *{{clerk note}} Please do not make any blocks yet, as this appears to have been a collection of mistakes rather than abusive sockpuppetry. ] (]) 18:29, 6 November 2012 (UTC) | ||
| *{{clerknote}} The edit summary was a reference to himself in the third person. There does not appear to have been any intent to deceive (see for more information). Closing. ] (]) 18:37, 6 November 2012 (UTC) | *{{clerknote}} The edit summary was a reference to himself in the third person. There does not appear to have been any intent to deceive (see for more information). Closing. ] (]) 18:37, 6 November 2012 (UTC) | ||
| ::I'm sorry to say that there is some ''very'' dodgy reasoning there ER! Referring to himself in the third person? That's highly dubious reasoning that pushes credibility a little too far, I'm afraid, as I suspect you know all too well. I wonder how many other people would have got away with such a spurious defence. Shameful. - ] (] • ]) 18:46, 6 November 2012 (UTC) | |||
| ----<!--- All comments go ABOVE this line, please. --> | ----<!--- All comments go ABOVE this line, please. --> | ||
Revision as of 18:46, 6 November 2012
FCYTravis
FCYTravis (talk · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
For archived investigations, see Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations/FCYTravis/Archive.
06 November 2012
– This SPI case is closed and will be archived shortly by an SPI clerk or checkuser.
- Suspected sockpuppets
- Polarscribe (talk · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
Engaging in edit warring over the Alcatraz Federal Penitentiary article. Suspected sock claims me to be invalidly removing tags "of another editor", even though the issues originally brought up have been fully addressed. Has since abused two accounts and his IP address to get his point across at on the talk page.♦ Dr. ☠ Blofeld 18:05, 6 November 2012 (UTC)
Comments by other users
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims. Not a sockpuppet - waiting for the accounts to be merged and I inadvertently forgot to log out from the other one. FCYTravis (talk) 18:06, 6 November 2012 (UTC)
- Bullshit, you're using two accounts and claiming to be two different editors. ♦ Dr. ☠ Blofeld 18:08, 6 November 2012 (UTC)
- Nonsense. I have never claimed to be two people. See Misplaced Pages:Changing usernames/Usurpation. In fact, I've made a public request to combine the accounts. You really are making all sorts of unfounded accusations about me, aren't you? polarscribe (talk) 18:13, 6 November 2012 (UTC)
- Tosh, you're using two accounts and claiming to be two different editors. You said 'removing tags placed by another editor', clearly you're now trying to cover up your sock puppetry. He is a disgruntled rogue ex- admin by his own admission now resorting to sock puppetry to get his own way, pretending that he has mass support over an issue which has actually been rectified anyway if he cared to reread the article. This is evidence of sock puppetry, you confess to being the same editor as you know a check user will reveal you to indeed be guilty but you claimed to be a different editor; Polarscribe added the tags originally here, and you claimed in the edit summary that another editor had added those tags. ♦ Dr. ☠ Blofeld 18:08, 6 November 2012 (UTC)
- By the clear indication of the timestamp, at 17:25 UTC I acknowledged existence of the two accounts and requested that they be merged into one. I have not further edited the article in question, and will not do so until the accounts are merged and the situation is settled. polarscribe (talk) 18:24, 6 November 2012 (UTC)
- Also, your characterization of me as a "disgruntled rogue ex-admin" is a textbook example of a personal attack and I strongly request that you retract it. polarscribe (talk) 18:36, 6 November 2012 (UTC)
Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
Clerk note: Please do not make any blocks yet, as this appears to have been a collection of mistakes rather than abusive sockpuppetry. Reaper Eternal (talk) 18:29, 6 November 2012 (UTC)
- Clerk note: The edit summary was a reference to himself in the third person. There does not appear to have been any intent to deceive (see here for more information). Closing. Reaper Eternal (talk) 18:37, 6 November 2012 (UTC)
- I'm sorry to say that there is some very dodgy reasoning there ER! Referring to himself in the third person? That's highly dubious reasoning that pushes credibility a little too far, I'm afraid, as I suspect you know all too well. I wonder how many other people would have got away with such a spurious defence. Shameful. - SchroCat (^ • @) 18:46, 6 November 2012 (UTC)
Categories: