Misplaced Pages

:Sockpuppet investigations/Echigo mole: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from[REDACTED] with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 05:56, 3 December 2012 view sourceMathsci (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers66,107 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit Revision as of 06:03, 3 December 2012 view source Mathsci (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers66,107 editsm →03 December 2012Next edit →
Line 16: Line 16:
* <small>''Auto-generated every hour.''</small> * <small>''Auto-generated every hour.''</small>


Standard trolling/wikihounding edits on project/arbcom-related pages with an obsessive interest in Echigo mole's own sockpuppetry. The first trolling edit of the first IP was removed by another user (Johnuniq) (it refers to my vote on ]). The other edits removed tagging of the user pages of Mikemikev ipsocks in Korea. That tagging was already recommended by CU (Deskana); the use of "]" in the edit summaries is one of the trademarks of Echigo mole. The recent edit of the second IP is again standard Echigo mole trolling: the over-familiarity and disgruntlement with the back history of SPI reports on Echigo mole. I have included a request for CU since this seems to involve another common feature: two anonymising open proxies in Chennai. I have assumed, perhaps wrongly, that other identifying data (computer type, operating system, browser, etc) is still visible. ] (]) 05:56, 3 December 2012 (UTC) ] (]) 05:56, 3 December 2012 (UTC) Standard trolling/wikihounding edits on project/arbcom-related pages with an obsessive interest in Echigo mole's own sockpuppetry. The first trolling edit of the first IP was removed by another user (Johnuniq) (it refers to my vote on ]). The other edits removed tagging of the user pages of Mikemikev ipsocks in Korea. That tagging was already recommended by CU (Deskana); the use of "]" in the edit summaries is one of the trademarks of Echigo mole. The recent edit of the second IP is again standard Echigo mole trolling: the over-familiarity with the back history of SPI reports on Echigo mole. I have included a request for CU since this seems to involve another common feature: two anonymising open proxies in Chennai. I have assumed, perhaps wrongly, that other identifying data (computer type, operating system, browser, etc) is still visible. ] (]) 05:56, 3 December 2012 (UTC) ] (]) 05:56, 3 December 2012 (UTC)


======<span style="font-size:150%">Comments by other users</span>====== ======<span style="font-size:150%">Comments by other users</span>======

Revision as of 06:03, 3 December 2012

Echigo mole

Echigo mole (talk · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)

Populated account categories: confirmed · suspected

Older archives were moved to an archive of the archive because of the page size and are listed below:

For archived investigations, see Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations/Echigo mole/Archive.



03 December 2012

– A user has requested CheckUser. An SPI clerk will shortly look at the case and endorse or decline the request.

Suspected sockpuppets


Standard trolling/wikihounding edits on project/arbcom-related pages with an obsessive interest in Echigo mole's own sockpuppetry. The first trolling edit of the first IP was removed by another user (Johnuniq) (it refers to my vote on Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Palestinian incitement). The other edits removed tagging of the user pages of Mikemikev ipsocks in Korea. That tagging was already recommended by CU (Deskana); the use of "WP:HUSH" in the edit summaries is one of the trademarks of Echigo mole. The recent edit of the second IP is again standard Echigo mole trolling: the over-familiarity with the back history of SPI reports on Echigo mole. I have included a request for CU since this seems to involve another common feature: two anonymising open proxies in Chennai. I have assumed, perhaps wrongly, that other identifying data (computer type, operating system, browser, etc) is still visible. Mathsci (talk) 05:56, 3 December 2012 (UTC) Mathsci (talk) 05:56, 3 December 2012 (UTC)

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
Categories:
Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations/Echigo mole: Difference between revisions Add topic