Misplaced Pages

Revision as of 16:53, 28 March 2013

RND RFC

Talkback

Fæ (talk) 09:13, 7 December 2011 (UTC)

Your POV-pushing on Talk:Cold fusion

Please do not collapse discussion threads by claiming WP:OR. That does not apply to discussion threads with which you disagree and is arguably vandalism or baiting. Greg L (talk) 01:54, 23 December 2011 (UTC)

Technically I'm no longer the one who collapsed your posting:

The talk page is there to improve the article. I collapsed your soap boxing because it doesn't belong on the talk page. If you insist it does you wont hear any argument from me. It isn't that important. 84.106.26.81 (talk) 02:07, 23 December 2011 (UTC)

Seeking clarification of your RfC response

Thanks for taking the time to respond to Talk:Fox News Channel#Request for Comment. Your comment prompted me to ask you a follow-up question there, and I'd be interested in your response. JamesMLane t c 10:21, 28 December 2011 (UTC)

regarding NASA - Cold fusion

There has been quite a bunch of discussion about this. You might want to read Talk:Cold_fusion#NASA_states:_.22it_works.22, Talk:Cold_fusion#POV_tag and Talk:Cold_fusion#Workshop_this_before_replacing_it. --Enric Naval (talk) 20:20, 23 January 2012 (UTC)

I don't get this edit. What is the point of removing "namely the recombination of hydrogen and oxygen"? The reader will be left hanging, asking himself what is that chemical reaction that we are talking about. And why remove the pointer to other part of the article? (actually, why is that sentence tagged as POV in the first place?)= --Enric Naval (talk) 20:47, 24 January 2012 (UTC)

I dunno who tagged it, I assumed it needed a source so I added one. My source wasn't specific about the type of chemical reaction.84.106.26.81 (talk) 22:37, 24 January 2012 (UTC)

Up in the air my articles for interception deletion

Hello thanks for the support in List of plasma (physics) articles but someone put it up for Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion along with List of laser articles, and List of infrared articles that I just created, If you want It would be awesome for You to comment with your own cognitive outcome instinct and not your compassion instinct on what should happen to them friend to the end at world end The end no to be continued.Shawn Worthington Laser Plasma (talk) 19:38, 7 February 2012 (UTC)

February 2012

Twice now you have blanked a large amount of content on WP:AE. If you do so again, this IP is likely to be blocked for vandalism. Thanks, Mathsci (talk)

You are also welcome to do what the other editors have done and update your section with more up to date comments, see what other users have done in the discussion. IRWolfie- (talk) 20:54, 15 February 2012 (UTC)

Here are my thoughts on the topic:

http://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia_talk:Arbitration_Committee/Clerks#Changing_a_topic_after_replies_have_been_posted

enjoy,

84.106.26.81 (talk) 21:47, 15 February 2012 (UTC)

• On any[REDACTED] page, and in particular on arbcom pages such WP:AE, you may not edit sections of other editors. That kind of disruptive editing is usually reported and dealt with at WP:AIV or WP:AN3. IRWolfie is free to expand his initial presentation, no matter what your personal feelings may be. Mathsci (talk) 22:00, 15 February 2012 (UTC)

Please post your reply on the Clerks topic.84.106.26.81 (talk) 22:11, 15 February 2012 (UTC)

No, here is the relevant place. Clerks do not normally have any role on WP:AE, as you can check yourself. It is run by administrators. Mathsci (talk) 22:16, 15 February 2012 (UTC)

The mechanism is not good.84.106.26.81 (talk) 23:20, 15 February 2012 (UTC)

If you wish to make a further comment do so in your own section, do not edit my filing. IRWolfie- (talk) 00:21, 16 February 2012 (UTC)

You write:

• "You can update your comment to say that it was with respect to the initial filing and provide a diff. I don't see the issue with this. My initial filing was one line long, I saw no reason why I should keep it seperate. IRWolfie- (talk) 23:26, 15 February 2012 (UTC)"

The problem with that is that it assumes I would even notice you updated the topic. There is no guarantee everyone who commented on then provided material will later check if the material their comment talks about is still the same.

The comments before that do not belong under the divs you provided but the reader can not see this. If this is how the mechanism is suppose to works the mechanism is wrong.

I'm sure you understand that my current comment does not talk about the case you filled. Neither do any of the other comments. If my comment should appear under that case I would first have to check out all the divs you provided, then I would write a reply.

That post has my signature but I certainly didn't say that about this case. My comment only applies to the previous one. Where you didn't even provide divs. The comments on that now look very much out of place.

I know you had no intention to but you've changed the meaning of my words. I consider that worth a bit of debate.

• "I noted on my edit when the last edit was made. I am also confused as to why you deleted my initial filing as well and not just my additions. Surely if your reasoning was to restore the original version you would not delete it as well (and twice)? IRWolfie- (talk) 23:26, 15 February 2012 (UTC)"

I might have deleted 1 line to much. Not really important now.

84.106.26.81 (talk) 03:36, 16 February 2012 (UTC)

The_Dragon_Family_(disambiguation)

Welcome to Misplaced Pages. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from The Dragon Family (disambiguation) with this edit. When removing content, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the content has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Jim1138 (talk) 08:00, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

The Dragon Family (disambiguation)

Sorry about reverting your edit. I was unable to figure out what you were up to and thought you were removing it for nefarious reasons. If you leave an edit summary, it would really help both you and I! Good luck with your article on The Dragon Family. Jim1138 (talk) 08:28, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

BTW: you might want to get an account to hide your IP address. Good luck! Jim1138 (talk) 08:45, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

See WP:3RR

Edit-warring is only going to get you blocked, and the article locked again: see WP:3RR AndyTheGrump (talk) 23:46, 14 March 2012 (UTC)

np 84.106.26.81 (talk) 17:16, 16 March 2012 (UTC)

August 2012

Welcome to Misplaced Pages. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, talk pages are meant to be a record of a discussion; deleting or editing legitimate comments, as you did at Talk:The Zeitgeist Movement, is considered bad practice, even if you meant it well. Even making spelling and grammatical corrections in others' comments is generally frowned upon, as it tends to irritate the users whose comments you are correcting. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. -- MST☆R 10:06, 5 August 2012 (UTC)

Hello. There is currently a discussion at Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. IRWolfie- (talk) 19:26, 5 August 2012 (UTC)

Unregistered users can't participate in RfA

You will need to create an account to participate. Please review WP:BENEFITS. Thanks. Viriditas (talk) 06:43, 18 March 2013 (UTC)

https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User_talk:Viriditas&oldid=545174813#Unregistered_users_can.27t_participate_in_RfA

Hi

Hi. I'm curious why you added a second infobox to my sandbox. Was there a reason for it? I'm just puzzled. Jason Quinn (talk) 03:40, 23 March 2013 (UTC)

Talkback

about edit button

 Jason Quinn (talk) 04:49, 23 March 2013 (UTC)