| Revision as of 06:00, 31 March 2013 editQwyrxian (talk | contribs)57,186 edits →Sources: new section← Previous edit | Revision as of 14:48, 31 March 2013 edit undoAoidh (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Checkusers, Oversighters, Administrators58,171 edits Warning: Violating the three-revert rule on Bodhidharma. (TW)Next edit → | ||
| Line 100: | Line 100: | ||
| Just in case you missed the edit summary, you're wrong, again. Adding unreliable sources is always, in every situation, a correct reason for reverting. You cannot add sources that do not meet ]. There really is nothing to "discuss" on the talk page. I suppose, if you want, you can try to argue that those sources are actually reliable...but the ] to do so always rests on the person trying to add the sources. Feel free to make some argument why those sources meet ]...and we can even take the matter to ]...but you should probably re-read the guideline first, as it should be pretty obvious why they fail. ] (]) 06:00, 31 March 2013 (UTC) | Just in case you missed the edit summary, you're wrong, again. Adding unreliable sources is always, in every situation, a correct reason for reverting. You cannot add sources that do not meet ]. There really is nothing to "discuss" on the talk page. I suppose, if you want, you can try to argue that those sources are actually reliable...but the ] to do so always rests on the person trying to add the sources. Feel free to make some argument why those sources meet ]...and we can even take the matter to ]...but you should probably re-read the guideline first, as it should be pretty obvious why they fail. ] (]) 06:00, 31 March 2013 (UTC) | ||
| == March 2013 == | |||
| ] Your recent editing history at ] shows that you are currently engaged in an ]. '''Being involved in an edit war can result in your being ]'''—especially if you violate the ], which states that an editor must not perform more than three ] on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—'''even if you don't violate the three-revert rule'''—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. | |||
| To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's ] to work toward making a version that represents ] among editors. See ] for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant ] or seek ]. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary ]. <!-- Template:uw-3rr --> ]] 14:48, 31 March 2013 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 14:48, 31 March 2013
TUSC token 2ac4f15e8e4c5ec78d8dfafc1c55b9ec
I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!
TUSC token 2ac4f15e8e4c5ec78d8dfafc1c55b9ec
I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!
Thampalakamam Divisional Secretariat
This is an automated message from MadmanBot. I have performed a search with the contents of Thampalakamam Divisional Secretariat, and it appears to be very similar to another Misplaced Pages page: Thampalakamam Divisional Secretary's Division. It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page— you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case. If you are intentionally trying to rename an article, please see Help:Moving a page for instructions on how to do this without copying and pasting. If you are trying to move or copy content from one article to a different one, please see Misplaced Pages:Copying within Misplaced Pages and be sure you have acknowledged the duplication of material in an edit summary to preserve attribution history.
It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article.Template:Z125 MadmanBot (talk) 11:06, 11 March 2013 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for March 14
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Misplaced Pages appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Chennai Madurai AC Duronto Express, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Southern Railways (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:53, 14 March 2013 (UTC)
--CuCl2 10:01, 23 March 2013 (UTC)
Welcome
Hello Coppercholride, and Welcome to Misplaced Pages![REDACTED]Welcome to Misplaced Pages! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction.
If you have any questions, feel free to ask me at my talk page — I'm happy to help. Or, you can ask your question at the New contributors' help page.
Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia...
Finding your way around:
|
|
Need help?
|
|
How you can help:
|
|
Additional tips...
|
|
![[REDACTED]](https://u3vuiephb.global.ssl.fastly.net/File:New-Bouncywikilogo.gif){kind=link}
Teahouse Invitation
| [REDACTED] | Hello! Copperchloride, you are invited to join other new editors and friendly hosts in the Teahouse. An awesome place to meet people, ask questions and learn more about Misplaced Pages. Please join us! Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 13:51, 23 March 2013 (UTC) |
![[REDACTED]](https://u3vuiephb.global.ssl.fastly.net/File:WP_teahouse_logo_2.png){kind=link}
Proposed deletion of Thirumurugan Gandhi
The article Thirumurugan Gandhi has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Misplaced Pages policy, this newly created biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.
If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Shirt58 (talk) 10:49, 30 March 2013 (UTC)
- Hi CuCl2, and thanks for your message. The article has not been deleted, it has been proposed to be deleted. Misplaced Pages has a very strong policy about biographies of living people. I've searched for Thirumurugan Gandhi and can find very little about him and/or the "May 17 movement" in English, Tamil, or Sinhala. Could you possibly add more references from reliable sources?
- Peter in Australia aka --Shirt58 (talk) 12:01, 30 March 2013 (UTC)
Citation needed tags
...are never vandalism. There is never any case, whatsoever, in which specific statistical claims do not need citations. Ever. The vast majority of facts on Misplaced Pages need citations, but there is no doubt that statistical claims need them. Now, I agree that Blacknight shouldn't be moving the sections of the article around, but there is nothing wrong with them adding cn tags; you removing them would be considered disruptive. I have re-added the tag, in fact, adding more.
In addition, please do re-read WP:VANDAL; you will see that content disputes are not vandalism, which only refers to actions specifically designed to make WP worse. Calling good faith edits vandalism can be considered a personal attack, so you should not do so. Qwyrxian (talk) 13:56, 30 March 2013 (UTC)
Andaman Express
Hello, Thank you for creating the article Andaman Express. However, the article lacks citations and references. Please add the same. Milesandkilometrestogo (talk) 17:37, 30 March 2013 (UTC)
Sources
Just in case you missed the edit summary, you're wrong, again. Adding unreliable sources is always, in every situation, a correct reason for reverting. You cannot add sources that do not meet WP:RS. There really is nothing to "discuss" on the talk page. I suppose, if you want, you can try to argue that those sources are actually reliable...but the burden to do so always rests on the person trying to add the sources. Feel free to make some argument why those sources meet WP:RS...and we can even take the matter to WP:RSN...but you should probably re-read the guideline first, as it should be pretty obvious why they fail. Qwyrxian (talk) 06:00, 31 March 2013 (UTC)
March 2013
Your recent editing history at Bodhidharma shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. SudoGhost 14:48, 31 March 2013 (UTC)