| Revision as of 10:29, 10 April 2013 editDragonTiger23 (talk | contribs)3,624 edits →Edits around homosexuality← Previous edit | Revision as of 10:30, 10 April 2013 edit undoDragonTiger23 (talk | contribs)3,624 edits →Edits around homosexualityNext edit → | ||
| Line 88: | Line 88: | ||
| I can't work out what you're up to, but if I was being cynical I would say you were trying to promote some sort of Turkish/ muslim/ Ottoman agenda. This resists any edits that suggest muslim/ Turkish/ Ottoman figures could have been homosexual (Mehmed the Conqueror). While at the same time you are editing Christian/ Assyrian/ Western articles with copious references to homosexuality (Sebastian of Portugal) - even though the sources you use are often weak. If this is what is happening then that is genuinely childish and not welcome on[REDACTED] (vandalism). If my suspicions are confirmed then I will alert what you are doing to an administrator. ] (]) 08:54, 10 April 2013 (UTC) | I can't work out what you're up to, but if I was being cynical I would say you were trying to promote some sort of Turkish/ muslim/ Ottoman agenda. This resists any edits that suggest muslim/ Turkish/ Ottoman figures could have been homosexual (Mehmed the Conqueror). While at the same time you are editing Christian/ Assyrian/ Western articles with copious references to homosexuality (Sebastian of Portugal) - even though the sources you use are often weak. If this is what is happening then that is genuinely childish and not welcome on[REDACTED] (vandalism). If my suspicions are confirmed then I will alert what you are doing to an administrator. ] (]) 08:54, 10 April 2013 (UTC) | ||
| :Promote some sort of Turkish/ muslim/ Ottoman agenda?? Where are you basing this on? I have only removed these categories in 1 or 2 articles. I have already explained everything in the talkpage. I know you control the page of Mehmed II but I never see you undoing the edits made by anonymous IPs or other biased persons who ignore the talk page. | :Promote some sort of Turkish/ muslim/ Ottoman agenda?? Where are you basing this on? I have only removed these categories in 1 or 2 articles. I have already explained everything in the talkpage. I know you control the page of Mehmed II but I never see you undoing the edits made by anonymous IPs or other biased persons who ignore the talk page. :If you are LGBT why do you find it disturbing that I add these categories to persons who are sourced. I think you are hypocritical adding eagerly weak sources to Ottoman rulers but then removing sourced info about Christian rulers. And about Ancient Assyria, the sources are not weak, that is claimed by an Assyrian user himself who probably is anti LGBT(!) | ||
| If you are LGBT why do you find it disturbing that I add these categories to persons who are sourced. I think you are hypocritical adding eagerly weak sources to Ottoman rulers but then removing sourced info about Christian rulers. And about Ancient Assyria, the sources are not weak, that is claimed by an Assyrian user himself who probably is anti LGBT(!) | |||
| I do not normally edit LGBT issues but I saw how eager IPs and Users are adding these categories to Ottoman rulers (Ofcourse because of hate towards Ottomans) so I thought maybe I should add these same categories to LGBT people where they seem to forget to add it(!). ] (]) 10:29, 10 April 2013 (UTC) | :I do not normally edit LGBT issues but I saw how eager IPs and Users are adding these categories to Ottoman rulers (Ofcourse because of hate towards Ottomans) so I thought maybe I should add these same categories to LGBT people where they seem to forget to add it(!). ] (]) 10:29, 10 April 2013 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 10:30, 10 April 2013
|
 Archives |
A page you started has been reviewed!
Thanks for creating Gasr Bu Hadi, DragonTiger23!
Misplaced Pages editor I dream of horses just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:
I think you are going to expand this article shortly, so I won't do anything.
To reply, leave a comment on I dream of horses's talk page.
Learn more about page curation.
A page you started has been reviewed!
Thanks for creating Kalmyk Khanate, DragonTiger23!
Misplaced Pages editor Kieranian2001 just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:
Reviewed as part of page curation. Interesting historical article. Additional references may be helpful and useful. Kieranian2001 (talk) 13:38, 20 November 2012 (UTC)
To reply, leave a comment on Kieranian2001's talk page.
Learn more about page curation.
Krakow
The article Krakow deserves sources with well-developed background info, not a single line in book unrelated to the city that says "probably", only "probably (!) counted 10,000 inhabitants..." If you honestly believe that the similar expanded data can be found in other sources, please provide them instead of flaming the summaries with unsupported claims. The single line you added is out of place where it is now and it does not reflect the source. I would rather see a short paragraph about the Medieval population there. Thanks, Poeticbent talk 19:51, 2 December 2012 (UTC)
That's a lot better. Please allow me to make your one-liner into a paragraph. Thanks, Poeticbent talk 20:43, 2 December 2012 (UTC)
Stop undoing
Stop changing the heading please.
Go make your own section. I made that section
It's the section of us all. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2001:4CA0:2201:1:4DBC:A6EA:1B56:E268 (talk) 14:31, 21 January 2013 (UTC)
- While I don't agree with the IP's sentiments, you shouldn't edit war over the heading - someone else will doubtless set it to whatever consensus is. --Ritchie333 14:34, 21 January 2013 (UTC)
Stop yelling also
Please. I know it does not help. (Been there, seen that...) Best wishes. --E4024 (talk) 18:30, 21 January 2013 (UTC)
It did help. After that the admins 'noticed'.DragonTiger23 (talk) 18:37, 21 January 2013 (UTC)
- No - it didn't help. I turned everyone against you, as can be expected. It negated your argument. Well done (✉→BWilkins←✎) 18:56, 21 January 2013 (UTC)
LGBT stuff
Your sources belong to Christian publishers, certainly of no academic value. You could've easily searched what academics has to say about this issue and found this one. In any case I suggest you keep the "Ataturk was gay" battle with your Greek friends in Youtube where it belongs, Misplaced Pages is not a place for such mentality.--Kathovo talk 10:47, 7 April 2013 (UTC)
- Why would christian publishers have no academic value, your arguments are the classic story I don't like it.
- LGBT in Assyrian culture has been investigated by historians and the sources I included had references to them. Yes I also found that some texts have commands against neighbors accusing of LGBT, I will add that too, but still it seems that Assyrians had an open homosexual society as their priests were men dressing in women clothes, and some kings also did this.
- I don't care about internet battles with weird people so your argument accusing me of ethnic/gay battles in YouTube is very childish. I am just adding information about ancient Assyrian culture, and your mentality about removing info which you do not like does not belong in Misplaced Pages.
- I will add the info back with the other point of view.DragonTiger23 (talk) 11:10, 7 April 2013 (UTC)
- No you may not. That article deals with the modern Aramaic speaking Christian community. You may add LGBT info regarding ancient Mesopotamian religion into its existing article.--Kathovo talk 13:39, 7 April 2013 (UTC)
Your contributed article, Rawanduz massacre
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, Rawanduz massacre. First, thank you for your contribution; Misplaced Pages relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – Rawanduz. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Misplaced Pages. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Rawanduz – you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.
If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Misplaced Pages looks forward to your future contributions. Kathovo talk 13:40, 7 April 2013 (UTC)
- Hi. We would only split out a separate article about the massacre if there was sufficient material for significantly larger coverage than in the original article. As it was, the new article really said nothing more than the article Rowanduz, and that article is very short and could easily accommodate some expansion if there is any further material. -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 13:53, 7 April 2013 (UTC)
Edits around homosexuality
I can't work out what you're up to, but if I was being cynical I would say you were trying to promote some sort of Turkish/ muslim/ Ottoman agenda. This resists any edits that suggest muslim/ Turkish/ Ottoman figures could have been homosexual (Mehmed the Conqueror). While at the same time you are editing Christian/ Assyrian/ Western articles with copious references to homosexuality (Sebastian of Portugal) - even though the sources you use are often weak. If this is what is happening then that is genuinely childish and not welcome on[REDACTED] (vandalism). If my suspicions are confirmed then I will alert what you are doing to an administrator. Contaldo80 (talk) 08:54, 10 April 2013 (UTC)
- Promote some sort of Turkish/ muslim/ Ottoman agenda?? Where are you basing this on? I have only removed these categories in 1 or 2 articles. I have already explained everything in the talkpage. I know you control the page of Mehmed II but I never see you undoing the edits made by anonymous IPs or other biased persons who ignore the talk page. :If you are LGBT why do you find it disturbing that I add these categories to persons who are sourced. I think you are hypocritical adding eagerly weak sources to Ottoman rulers but then removing sourced info about Christian rulers. And about Ancient Assyria, the sources are not weak, that is claimed by an Assyrian user himself who probably is anti LGBT(!)
- I do not normally edit LGBT issues but I saw how eager IPs and Users are adding these categories to Ottoman rulers (Ofcourse because of hate towards Ottomans) so I thought maybe I should add these same categories to LGBT people where they seem to forget to add it(!). DragonTiger23 (talk) 10:29, 10 April 2013 (UTC)