Misplaced Pages

Didymelaceae: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from[REDACTED] with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 09:06, 25 May 2006 editBrya (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users4,919 edits cat← Previous edit Revision as of 00:23, 8 June 2006 edit undoMPF (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users42,329 edits copyeditNext edit →
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Taxobox {{Taxobox
| color = lightgreen | color = lightgreen
| name = ''Didymelaceae'' | name = Didymelaceae
| image =
| regnum = '']ae'', <br>''']'''
| ordo = unplaced | image_width = 240px
| regnum = ]
⚫ | familia = ''Didymelaceae''
| divisio = ]
| familia_authority = Leandri (1937)
| classis = ]
| ordo = unplaced or ]
⚫ | familia = '''Didymelaceae'''
| familia_authority = ]
| subdivision_ranks = genera | subdivision_ranks = genera
| subdivision = see text | subdivision =
'']''
}} }}


'''''Didymelaceae''''' is the ] for a ] of ]. Such a family has been recognised by a fair number of taxonomists, at least over the past few decades. '''Didymelaceae''' is a ] of ]. The family has been recognised by a fair number of taxonomists, at least over the past few decades.


The ], of 2003, does not recognize such a family, at least not as such. The plants involved are included in the family '']''. However, APG II does allow the option of segregating this family, as an optional segregate: it is then unplaced as to order and left among the basal lineages of the ''']'''. The ] of 2003 does not recognise the family as such, the plants involved being included in the family ]. However, APG II does allow the option of segregating this family, as an optional segregate; it is then unplaced as to order and left among the basal lineages of the ].


This represents a slight change from the ], of 1998, which firmly did recognize this family, with the same placement. This represents a slight change from the ], of 1998, which firmly did recognised the family, with the same placement.


The family consists of a single genus only, '']'', with probably two species of evergreen trees, restricted to ] and the ]. The family consists of a single genus only, '']'', with probably two species of evergreen trees, restricted to ] and the ].


''External links :'' ==External links==
:* in L. Watson and M.J. Dallwitz (1992 onwards). '': descriptions, illustrations, identification, information retrieval.'' Version: 3rd May 2006. http://delta-intkey.com. * in L. Watson and M.J. Dallwitz (1992 onwards).
:* *


] ]
] ]


] ]

Revision as of 00:23, 8 June 2006

Didymelaceae
Scientific classification
Kingdom: Plantae
Division: Magnoliophyta
Class: Magnoliopsida
Order: unplaced or Buxales
Family: Didymelaceae
Leandri
genera

Didymeles

Didymelaceae is a family of flowering plants. The family has been recognised by a fair number of taxonomists, at least over the past few decades.

The APG II system of 2003 does not recognise the family as such, the plants involved being included in the family Buxaceae. However, APG II does allow the option of segregating this family, as an optional segregate; it is then unplaced as to order and left among the basal lineages of the eudicots.

This represents a slight change from the APG system, of 1998, which firmly did recognised the family, with the same placement.

The family consists of a single genus only, Didymeles, with probably two species of evergreen trees, restricted to Madagascar and the Comoro Islands.

External links

Categories:
Didymelaceae: Difference between revisions Add topic