| Revision as of 04:03, 16 May 2013 view sourceRussavia (talk | contribs)78,741 edits what an ugly couch that is← Previous edit | Revision as of 19:14, 16 May 2013 view source Sandstein (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators188,631 edits You have been blocked from editing for violating an arbitration decision with your edits. (TW)Next edit → | ||
| Line 55: | Line 55: | ||
| If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "]" link (it is located at the very top of any Misplaced Pages page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any '''articles''' will be deleted after seven days, as described on ]. Thank you.<!-- Template:Orphaned --> ] (]) 04:09, 26 April 2013 (UTC) | If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "]" link (it is located at the very top of any Misplaced Pages page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any '''articles''' will be deleted after seven days, as described on ]. Thank you.<!-- Template:Orphaned --> ] (]) 04:09, 26 April 2013 (UTC) | ||
| == May 2013 == | |||
| <div class="user-block" style="min-height: 40px"> To enforce an ] decision, and for from interacting with Volunteer Marek, as explained , ]you have been ''']''' from editing for '''48 hours'''. You are welcome to ] once the block expires. If you believe this block is unjustified, please read the ] and then appeal your block using the instructions there. <small><span style="border:1px solid black;padding:1px;">]</span></small> 19:14, 16 May 2013 (UTC) <hr/><p><small>'''Reminder to administrators:''' In March 2010, ArbCom adopted a ] "from reversing or overturning (explicitly or in substance) any action taken by another administrator pursuant to the terms of an active arbitration remedy, and explicitly noted as being taken to enforce said remedy, except: (a) with the written authorization of the Committee, or (b) following a clear, substantial, and active consensus of uninvolved editors at a community discussion noticeboard (such as WP:AN or WP:ANI). If consensus in such discussions is hard to judge or unclear, the parties should submit a request for clarification on the proper page." Administrators who reverse an arbitration enforcement block, such as this one, without clear authorisation will be summarily desysopped.</small></div><!-- Template:uw-aeblock --> | |||
Revision as of 19:14, 16 May 2013
| Welcome to my talk page. Please leave me a message, alternatively you are welcome to email me. If you leave a message here for me and it requires a reply, I will reply here, so you may want to add my talk page to your watchlist. All users have my permission to remove any bot messages from my talk page at any time. |
|---|
 |
|---|
| 15 January 2025 |
|
 Archives |
|
Index 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 |
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 7 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III. |
Warning to others by Administrator Sandstein
There is little point talking to Russavia here at the moment, as he has been officially silenced:
- "05:22, 16 April 2013 Sandstein (talk | contribs) changed block settings for Russavia (talk | contribs) with an expiry time of 19:50, 15 May 2013 (account creation blocked, cannot edit own talk page) (Arbitration enforcement: Removing talk page access for severe talk page misconduct, http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User_talk:Russavia&diff=prev&oldid=550544960)"
Anyone else failing to follow the Arbcom commands or raising valuable questions and points will similarly have their typing hand similarly severed at the wrist. What an amazing project this is. Presumably, the next penalty is having one's brains bashed in with a public stoning. Giano 12:11, 16 April 2013 (UTC)
- You don't see why there might be a problem with suggesting that someone else is retarded and should be neutered? AutomaticStrikeout (T • C • Sign AAPT) 14:20, 16 April 2013 (UTC)
- For me, this is not about Russavia; it's about any editor who finds himself in Russavia's position: I don't see that reverting trolls on one's own talk page after making it quite clear that their presence is unwelcome can be a crime in anyone's book. Neither do I find it hugely startling that someone becomes angry in theses circumstances. Those poking and goading him, were hoping for that reaction and they got it - surprise! surprise! I have thought for sometime that Sandstein is quite ridiculous and extrememly gullible; he constantly allows himself to be engineered and manoeuvred in return for plaudits for the 'brave' actions upon which he thrives. That's rather pathetic really, but Sandstein should beware - I have seen this many times before, an Arbcom approvingly allows one admin too much power in carrying out its wishes and dirty work, and then that admin become too confident and full of himself as he fearlessly struts around Misplaced Pages in jackboots. Then one day, it all goes horribly wrong for both him and his Arbcom and it always ends in tears. I shall be proven right, but by then it will too late for countless other editors. Misplaced Pages never learns from its own history. Giano 15:13, 16 April 2013 (UTC)
- Your right in almost all respects. Kumioko (talk) 17:23, 16 April 2013 (UTC)
- That is indeed Giano's right. And he seems to be picking up other rights as well now. --Demiurge1000 (talk) 03:01, 17 April 2013 (UTC)
Sockpuppet investigation
I have started Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations/Russavia to research the link between you and User:Seleucidis. Fram (talk) 12:51, 16 April 2013 (UTC)
The SPI has been closed with the conclusion that someone was trying to joe job you. Not anything you can be held responsible for of course. User:Seleucidis is indefinitely blocked though. Fram (talk) 13:22, 16 April 2013 (UTC)
- And if you had any decency you would apologize for your allegation.
- Kiefer.Wolfowitz 13:55, 16 April 2013 (UTC)
- Have you actually read the SPI in full? Fram is quite clear in it that the report was filed because the account is an obvious sockpuppet, but that he is not convinced that Russavia is the sockpuppeteer. He very conspicuously warns the SPI investigators that Russavia may be the victim of a joe job. Given this I don't see what he possibly has to apologize for. —Psychonaut (talk) 14:03, 16 April 2013 (UTC)
- I think the Checkusers are to be applauded. They have now been able to report Russavia's IP address to whoever it is that controls this particular (seemingly self-governing) section of our community - The Misplaced Pages Secret Service. I'm quite sure it's not the first time that they have done so, but he may have furtively and wickedly changed his internet supplier, computer or even evasively moved house since their last chance (evil, wicked people like him do this sort of thing all the time) So the check users need to be on top of these things. It also keeps the aforementioned, wicked, evil Russavia in a nervous state if he thinks they may know who he is - psychological warfare is the key here. Although, I'm quite sure they all read Wikipeiocracy so quite why they need to know these things, on the daftest of excuses, is baffling.. Sad old life for some, isn't it? Giano 18:40, 17 April 2013 (UTC)
- Have you actually read the SPI in full? Fram is quite clear in it that the report was filed because the account is an obvious sockpuppet, but that he is not convinced that Russavia is the sockpuppeteer. He very conspicuously warns the SPI investigators that Russavia may be the victim of a joe job. Given this I don't see what he possibly has to apologize for. —Psychonaut (talk) 14:03, 16 April 2013 (UTC)
List of casinos
http://en.wikipedia.org/List_of_casinos — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cowgummi (talk • contribs) 01:32, 18 April 2013 (UTC)
Four barnstars for good luck!
Hey Russavia!
I have added 4 barnstars on your user page:-) Unfortunately I did not manage to put them under your userboxes. I placed them under on your page. Please remove them to the right place, but wait with doing that, till your block is finished. You are not allowed to talk to me about them, because two of the barnstars are of national merit and any comment will be seen as violation of your topic ban. I have explicitly asked administrator Sandstein about it. There is no need to thank me of something like this. You deserve them all, so you have got them. It is a pity, that nobody had noticed it before, that you are a good contributor to Misplaced Pages and Commons, and you even find time to add a valuable photo to articles on Polish Misplaced Pages from time to time. I really appreciate that a lot. You know, people tend to notice bad things about somebody much easier than somebody's good deeds. That's life, I am afraid. You can always contact me on WP-PL. Good luck! --Seleucidis (talk) 14:52, 21 April 2013 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free media (File:Dniproavia logo.png)
Thanks for uploading File:Dniproavia logo.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Misplaced Pages under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Misplaced Pages. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Misplaced Pages (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Misplaced Pages page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:09, 26 April 2013 (UTC)
){kind=link}
May 2013
To enforce an arbitration decision, and for violating your ban from interacting with Volunteer Marek, as explained on my talk page,
Reminder to administrators: In March 2010, ArbCom adopted a procedure prohibiting administrators "from reversing or overturning (explicitly or in substance) any action taken by another administrator pursuant to the terms of an active arbitration remedy, and explicitly noted as being taken to enforce said remedy, except: (a) with the written authorization of the Committee, or (b) following a clear, substantial, and active consensus of uninvolved editors at a community discussion noticeboard (such as WP:AN or WP:ANI). If consensus in such discussions is hard to judge or unclear, the parties should submit a request for clarification on the proper page." Administrators who reverse an arbitration enforcement block, such as this one, without clear authorisation will be summarily desysopped.