| Revision as of 16:09, 23 May 2013 editOhwrotcod (talk | contribs)166 edits →User-reported← Previous edit | Revision as of 16:13, 23 May 2013 edit undoAlexf (talk | contribs)Administrators192,727 edits cmtNext edit → | ||
| Line 22: | Line 22: | ||
| * {{Vandal|username}} optional brief reason for listing (keep it short) ~~~~ | * {{Vandal|username}} optional brief reason for listing (keep it short) ~~~~ | ||
| List begins BELOW this line --> | <!-- List begins BELOW this line --> | ||
| List begins BELOW this line --> | |||
| <!-- HBC AIV helperbot WARNING --> | <!-- HBC AIV helperbot WARNING --> | ||
| *{{IPvandal|168.169.228.2}} – On ] (): vandalism after final warning. Continued disruptive editing on 2 articles after final warning.. ] (]) 15:33, 23 May 2013 (UTC) | *{{IPvandal|168.169.228.2}} – On ] (): vandalism after final warning. Continued disruptive editing on 2 articles after final warning.. ] (]) 15:33, 23 May 2013 (UTC) | ||
| Line 30: | Line 29: | ||
| *{{IPvandal|50.155.171.83}} - continued vandalism despite warnings. ]]....] ''eating shoes for just 7 years'' 16:02, 23 May 2013 (UTC) | *{{IPvandal|50.155.171.83}} - continued vandalism despite warnings. ]]....] ''eating shoes for just 7 years'' 16:02, 23 May 2013 (UTC) | ||
| ]. Removing proposed deletion tags from articles that have been listed as unsourced for in some cases five years. Example(of many) . Also taken it upon him/herself to redirect articles without first having discussed possible issues . I understand is he/she wishes articles to be redirected, but surely he/she needs to discuss it before simply doing it? Likewise, is he/she feels that the articles that have been pfd are worthy, wouldn't it be far better to discuss it, rather than remove the tags with no reason given(and they remain with no RS)? (PS. I am the 41 IP who has just created an account)] (]) 16:09, 23 May 2013 (UTC) <small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 16:03, 23 May 2013 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | *]. Removing proposed deletion tags from articles that have been listed as unsourced for in some cases five years. Example(of many) . Also taken it upon him/herself to redirect articles without first having discussed possible issues . I understand is he/she wishes articles to be redirected, but surely he/she needs to discuss it before simply doing it? Likewise, is he/she feels that the articles that have been pfd are worthy, wouldn't it be far better to discuss it, rather than remove the tags with no reason given(and they remain with no RS)? (PS. I am the 41 IP who has just created an account)] (]) 16:09, 23 May 2013 (UTC) <small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 16:03, 23 May 2013 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | ||
| ::{{AIV|3rr}} ]<sup><i>]</i></sup> 16:13, 23 May 2013 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 16:13, 23 May 2013
| Noticeboards | |
|---|---|
| Misplaced Pages's centralized discussion, request, and help venues. For a listing of ongoing discussions and current requests, see the dashboard. For a related set of forums which do not function as noticeboards see formal review processes. | |
| General | |
| Articles, content | |
| Page handling | |
| User conduct | |
| Other | |
| Category:Misplaced Pages noticeboards | |
Before reporting, read the spam and vandalism pages, as well as the AIV guide. To submit, edit this page and follow the instructions at the top of the "User-reported" section. For other issues, file a request for administrator attention.
Important!- The edits of the user must be obvious vandalism or obvious spam.
- Except for egregious cases, the user must have been given enough warning(s).
- The warning(s) must have been given recently and there must be reasonable grounds to believe the user(s) will further disrupt the site in the immediate future.
- If you decide that a report should be filed, place the following template at the bottom of the User-reported section:
* {{Vandal|Example user or IP}} Your concise reason (e.g. vandalised past 4th warning). ~~~~
- Requests for further sanctions against a blocked user (e.g., talk page, e-mail blocks) should be made at Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
- Reports of sockpuppetry should be made at Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations unless the connection between the accounts is obvious and disruption is recent and ongoing.
- This noticeboard can grow and become backlogged. Stale reports are automatically cleared by MDanielsBot after 4–8 hours with no action.
You can subscribe to a web feed of this page in either RSS or Atom format.
This page was last updated at 21:57 on 22 January 2025 (UTC). Purge the cache of this page if it is out of date.
Reports
Bot-reported
- DisneyEditor1 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) - SpongeBob SquarePants season 7 was changed by DisneyEditor1 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.91034 on 2025-01-22T06:18:36+00:00 (Automated) ClueBot NG (talk) 06:18, 22 January 2025 (UTC)
Declined. User seems to be trying to discuss (they are, as such users often are, being obstinate, but per Churchill better to key-key than disrupt-disrupt). Daniel Case (talk) 19:41, 22 January 2025 (UTC)
- Trudoholic (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 926 (Image vandalism II, details). Note: Please carefully consider context before blocking. Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 06:30, 22 January 2025 (UTC)
- False positive. Edits are not vandalism. Daniel Case (talk) 19:43, 22 January 2025 (UTC)
- 64.202.81.249 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped disruption-catching filters five times in the last 5 minutes (details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 19:49, 22 January 2025 (UTC)
User-reported
- 168.169.228.2 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – On Buffalo Bills (): vandalism after final warning. Continued disruptive editing on 2 articles after final warning.. Arxiloxos (talk) 15:33, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
- 50.155.171.83 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) - continued vandalism despite warnings. Simply south...... eating shoes for just 7 years 16:02, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
- User:Bondegezou. Removing proposed deletion tags from articles that have been listed as unsourced for in some cases five years. Example(of many) . Also taken it upon him/herself to redirect articles without first having discussed possible issues . I understand is he/she wishes articles to be redirected, but surely he/she needs to discuss it before simply doing it? Likewise, is he/she feels that the articles that have been pfd are worthy, wouldn't it be far better to discuss it, rather than remove the tags with no reason given(and they remain with no RS)? (PS. I am the 41 IP who has just created an account)Ohwrotcod (talk) 16:09, 23 May 2013 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ohwrotcod (talk • contribs) 16:03, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
This noticeboard is for obvious vandals and spammers only. Consider taking this report to Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring. Alexf 16:13, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
