Misplaced Pages

Revision as of 14:27, 10 July 2013

Archives

Archive 1

This page has archives. Sections older than 31 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 4 sections are present.

Requested move of Deadmaus

You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:Deadmaus#Requested_move_3_.28to_.22Joel_Zimmerman.22.29. Obi-Wan Kenobi (talk) 16:19, 18 June 2013 (UTC)Template:Z48

Hello! There is a DR/N request you may have interest in.

This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Misplaced Pages:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult for editors. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help find a resolution. The thread is "deadmaus, deadmau5". Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you! EarwigBot 03:10, 19 June 2013 (UTC)

Keith D refusal to engage in rational discussion/harassment

I'll explain why. I updated Neill Byrne's stats. He has made 10 appearances and scored 2 goals this season. For the last several months, his stats have been left unedited and only included 7 of his 10 appearances. I corrected his stats as of the day of his last game and included a link to soccerbase.com to prove this. Immediately afterwards, this individual, who has been edit warring with & harassing me for several months reverted my edits to include a timestamp, which I had already provided (correct date of his last match). There are no rules that state that you must put in exact date down to the second you made your edit. A simple "match played eg 22 Dec" is sufficient. I would have no problem with this individual putting a timestamp on Neill Byrne's page because he updates his stats and maintains his Misplaced Pages page but he doesn't. He just reverts my edits to get a rise out of me & spite me. If I hadn't amended Neill Byrne's stats & those of other footballers, then they would be left incorrect for weeks and months. I am getting sick of editing & maintaining Misplaced Pages pages, only to have my work be repeatedly undermined by this individual. I have already given up on updating the Misplaced Pages pages of Hull City's Irish players because this individual repeatedly reverts my edits, because seemingly he owns the rights to Hull City's Misplaced Pages page.

Finally, I have tried establishing dialogue with Keith about this and tried to explain my point of view, but he ignores me & refuses to listen to me. I don't deserve to be harassed & followed every time I make an edit. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.44.247.208 (talk) 19:30, 21 June 2013 (UTC)

Also, Keith D should be told to stop locking pages because of timestamps. If I choose to write "match played 22 Dec". That is factually correct, not "vandalism". I do not see the need to write down the exact date of my edit down to the tiniest detail, when it does not correspond to the date John Doe footballer played his last game. It confuses Misplaced Pages readers who believe John Doe footballer played last game on date of user's edit & not date of "match played". It is needless & arbitrary. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.44.247.208 (talk) 19:35, 21 June 2013 (UTC)

The IP knows what the consensus on WP:FOOTY has been about timestamps on football players and continually changes them against the consensus. Keith D (talk) 19:49, 21 June 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 22

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Misplaced Pages appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Confess (album), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Production (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:56, 22 June 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: Tees music alliance

Hello Insulam Simia. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Tees music alliance, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Article claims coverage in reliable sources. Thank you. — Malik Shabazz /_Stalk 02:30, 30 June 2013 (UTC)

Guest Editing Doc Rivers

I am sorry I realised that doc rivers is on the clippers not o the raptors can you refresh them. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 184.147.39.100 (talk) 16:24, 30 June 2013 (UTC)

The edit has been reverted already. Thanks. Insulam Simia (/_contribs) 16:27, 30 June 2013 (UTC)

Ways to improve Covisint

Hi, I'm Jackson Peebles. Insulam Simia, thanks for creating Covisint!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Thanks for making this contribution! I really found it helpful, and my only recommendation is to improve the references by adding some additional information, possibly using the cite templates and to lengthen the article if possible.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse. Jackson Peebles (talk) 16:45, 3 July 2013 (UTC)

Talk page

Please stop posting on my edit page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Marmac83 (talk • contribs)

RfC

A RM was just opened up at Talk: Tech Nine that you might want to comment at. STATic message me! 15:58, 8 July 2013 (UTC)