| Revision as of 15:16, 19 July 2013 editAussieLegend (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, File movers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers173,395 editsm typo← Previous edit | Revision as of 15:18, 19 July 2013 edit undo220.245.146.235 (talk) →DiscussionNext edit → | ||
| Line 46: | Line 46: | ||
| === Discussion === | === Discussion === | ||
| Regarding , it isn't just a matter of looking at the talk page, you need to discuss your edits. They are obviously disputed and in such situations we follow ], we don't continue to edit war as you are doing. That achieves nothing. As you have now reverted 6 times in the last 9 hours you will most certainly be blocked, so you should start discussing now, at the very least as a token of good faith. While discussing disputed edits, the ] prevails, which means you shouldn't be bulldozing your edits back into the article as soon as they are reverted by another editor (3 of us so far). --] (]) 15:14, 19 July 2013 (UTC) | Regarding , it isn't just a matter of looking at the talk page, you need to discuss your edits. They are obviously disputed and in such situations we follow ], we don't continue to edit war as you are doing. That achieves nothing. As you have now reverted 6 times in the last 9 hours you will most certainly be blocked, so you should start discussing now, at the very least as a token of good faith. While discussing disputed edits, the ] prevails, which means you shouldn't be bulldozing your edits back into the article as soon as they are reverted by another editor (3 of us so far). --] (]) 15:14, 19 July 2013 (UTC) | ||
| : Let's discuss, then! I'd like a cupcake, please. ^^ Also, only two. You, "Legend", and Drmm-y boy over there! ] (]) 15:18, 19 July 2013 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 15:18, 19 July 2013
 Welcome!Last edited:Last edited by:15:18, 19 July 2013 (UTC) 220.245.146.235 (talk · contribs) Interested in becoming a regular contributor to Misplaced Pages? Create an account! Your IP address, To have your own user pages, keep track of articles you've edited in a watchlist, and have access to a few other special features, please consider registering an account! It's fast and free. If you are autoblocked repeatedly, contact your Internet service provider or network administrator and request it contact Wikimedia's XFF project about enabling X-Forwarded-For HTTP headers on its proxy servers so that blocks will affect only the intended user.Administrators: review contributions carefully if blocking this IP address or reverting its contributions. If a block is needed, consider a soft block using Template:Anonblock.
 Network administrators, to monitor this IP address for vandalism, can subscribe to a web feed of this page in either RSS or Atom format. |
May 2013
Your recent editing history at The Name of the Doctor shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Anaxial (talk) 17:40, 12 May 2013 (UTC)
- If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
July 2013
When editing artcles, please take care to ensure that your edits are appropriate. This edit summary includes some fundamental flaws that are addressed on the talk page. Season 6 isn't airing, despite your asssertion (it won't start for 2 months), the table isn't what is being referred to, the section titled "Season 6: (2013) is what is being referred to, and so on. Please do not edit the article again without first discussing on the article's talk page. --AussieLegend (✉) 05:35, 19 July 2013 (UTC)
Your recent editing history at List of Castle episodes shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. --Drmargi (talk) 07:35, 19 July 2013 (UTC)
- IP hopping to avoid the appearance of 3RR won't work; it's easy to track your IP. --Drmargi (talk) 07:36, 19 July 2013 (UTC)
Message to Drmargi
Didn't IP hop. I returned home today, so naturally I'll have a different IP. Get your facts straight before you start accusing people. Also:
"Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly."
How about you and "AussieLegend", as much of a legend he is not, take that into consideration? I'm just as much an author as you are.
220.245.146.235 (talk) 08:08, 19 July 2013 (UTC)
3RR breach
Based on your acknowledgement above that you are the IP who added the table entry to List of Castle episodes, it appears that you have now breached the three-revert rule at that article. As a result, you may find yourself blocked from editing at any time. --AussieLegend (✉) 08:52, 19 July 2013 (UTC)
- That's four on this account, and two more from your work account. --Drmargi (talk) 09:34, 19 July 2013 (UTC)
- As of right now, the count is 6 on this account in the past 9 hours., , , , , --AussieLegend (✉) 14:59, 19 July 2013 (UTC)
- You.. You can.. YOU CAN COUNT? :O 220.245.146.235 (talk) 15:14, 19 July 2013 (UTC)
@AussieLegend
You should say the same to yourself, "mate". ;)
- Well no, I can't. I chose to disengage after your first edit under this IP. You have continued to edit war after a receiving a 3RR warning and then notification that you had breached 3RR. You've refused to discuss on the talk page, which is what we normally do when there is a content dispute, which is why I started the discussion there. --AussieLegend (✉) 10:08, 19 July 2013 (UTC)
Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Misplaced Pages's policy on edit warring. Thank you. --Drmargi (talk) 09:54, 19 July 2013 (UTC)
Discussion
Regarding this edit summary, it isn't just a matter of looking at the talk page, you need to discuss your edits. They are obviously disputed and in such situations we follow WP:BRD, we don't continue to edit war as you are doing. That achieves nothing. As you have now reverted 6 times in the last 9 hours you will most certainly be blocked, so you should start discussing now, at the very least as a token of good faith. While discussing disputed edits, the status quo prevails, which means you shouldn't be bulldozing your edits back into the article as soon as they are reverted by another editor (3 of us so far). --AussieLegend (✉) 15:14, 19 July 2013 (UTC)
- Let's discuss, then! I'd like a cupcake, please. ^^ Also, only two. You, "Legend", and Drmm-y boy over there! 220.245.146.235 (talk) 15:18, 19 July 2013 (UTC)