Misplaced Pages

Academic elitism: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from[REDACTED] with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 07:58, 20 August 2013 editNJJ289 (talk | contribs)8 edits (→Description: Added citation cleanup tags, removed unnecessarily specific and extraneous paraphrases of Thomas Sowell's book, edited Zhang quote, removed biases← Previous edit Revision as of 08:05, 20 August 2013 edit undoNJJ289 (talk | contribs)8 edits Removed unclear text in introduction, added internal link.Tag: Visual editNext edit →
Line 1: Line 1:
'''Academic elitism''' is the criticism that academia or academicians are prone to ], or that certain experts or ] propose ideas based more on support from academic colleagues than on real world experience. The term "]" often carries with it an implicit critique of academic elitism. '''Academic elitism''' is the criticism that ] or academics are prone to ]. The term "]" often carries with it an implicit critique of academic elitism.


== Description == == Description ==

Revision as of 08:05, 20 August 2013

Academic elitism is the criticism that academia or academics are prone to elitism. The term "ivory tower" often carries with it an implicit critique of academic elitism.

Description

Economist Thomas Sowell's Intellectuals and Society claims that intellectuals have an undeserved "halo effect" and face fewer disincentives than other professions against speaking outside their expertise. In Sowell's estimation, academics respected for their contributions in their particular discipline often become known to the general public by commenting on policy issues outside that discipline.

Critics of academic elitism argue that highly-educated people tend to form an isolated social group whose views tend to be overrepresented among journalists, professors, and other members of the intelligentsia who often draw their salary and funding from taxpayers. Economist Dan Klein shows that the worldwide top-35 economics departments pull 76 percent of their faculty from their own graduates. He argues that the academic culture is pyramidal, not polycentric, and resembles a closed and genteel social circle. Meanwhile, he claims, academia draws on resources from taxpayers, foundations, endowments, and tuition payers, and it judges the social service delivered. The result is a self-organizing and self-validating circle.

Another criticism is that universities tend more to pseudo-intellectualism than intellectualism per se; for example, academicians may be charged with over-complicating problems and expressing them in obscure language (e.g., the Sokal affair, obscurantism).

Academic elitism suggests that in highly competitive academic environments only those individuals who have engaged in scholarship are deemed to have anything worthwhile to say, or do. It suggests that individuals who have not engaged in such scholarship are cranks. Steven Zhang of the Cornell Daily Sun has described the graduates of elite schools, especially those in the Ivy League, as having a "smug sense of success" because "It makes us believe gaining entrance into the Ivy League is an accomplishment unto itself."

See also

References

  1. Klein, Daniel B. (2005). "The Ph.D. Circle in Academic Economics". Econ Journal Watch. 2 (1): 133–148. {{cite journal}}: Invalid |ref=harv (help)
  2. http://cornellsun.com/node/46778

Further reading

  • Trow, Martin, "Problems in the Transition from Elite to Mass Education," Carnegie Commission on Higher Education, 1973 .
  • Papers about Academic elitism
Categories:
Academic elitism: Difference between revisions Add topic