| Revision as of 18:24, 16 October 2013 view sourceDarkness Shines (talk | contribs)31,762 edits →SPI?: Re← Previous edit | Revision as of 18:27, 16 October 2013 view source GregJackP (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers24,868 edits →SPI?: rNext edit → | ||
| Line 116: | Line 116: | ||
| :Two other editors had the same idea, that socking was present, and although one of them had not connected it with Niemti, the other editor's first thought was Niemti. He also has a long and extensive history of socking. If you don't agree, OK, but there is good behavioral evidence and I'm sure that a checkuser would confirm it, if not quashed for other reasons. <span style="border:1px solid #900;padding:2px;background:#fffff4">] ]</span> 18:18, 16 October 2013 (UTC) | :Two other editors had the same idea, that socking was present, and although one of them had not connected it with Niemti, the other editor's first thought was Niemti. He also has a long and extensive history of socking. If you don't agree, OK, but there is good behavioral evidence and I'm sure that a checkuser would confirm it, if not quashed for other reasons. <span style="border:1px solid #900;padding:2px;background:#fffff4">] ]</span> 18:18, 16 October 2013 (UTC) | ||
| ::You will not get CU as you gave no behavioral proof at all, I will look into it. ] (]) 18:24, 16 October 2013 (UTC) | ::You will not get CU as you gave no behavioral proof at all, I will look into it. ] (]) 18:24, 16 October 2013 (UTC) | ||
| :::I'll admit I'm not up on sock-hunting, it's never been a priority of mine. I would appreciate the help. <span style="border:1px solid #900;padding:2px;background:#fffff4">] ]</span> 18:27, 16 October 2013 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 18:27, 16 October 2013
| This is GregJackP's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments. |
|
Archives: Index, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14Auto-archiving period: 7 days  |
 Archives | ||||||||||||||
Index
|
||||||||||||||
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 7 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 4 sections are present. |
Please add new posts at the bottom of the page.
AFC Backlog
Articles for Creation urgently needs YOUR help!
 Articles for Creation is desperately short of reviewers! We are looking for urgent help, from experienced editors, in reviewing submissions in the pending submissions queue. Currently there are 1884 submissions waiting to be reviewed and many help requests at our Help Desk.
If the answer to these questions is yes, then please read the reviewing instructions and donate a little of your time to helping tackle the backlog. You might wish to add {{AFC status}} or {{AfC Defcon}} to your userpage, which will alert you to the number of open submissions.
We would greatly appreciate your help. Currently, only a small handful of users are reviewing articles. Any help, even if it's just 2 or 3 reviews, it would be extremely beneficial. |
Rio Alto Mining
Hey Greg,
I am the author of the Rio Alto Mining page you highlighted for deletion. Please pardon me, that article is my first Misplaced Pages page I have written. That said, I believe the topic is notable -- according to the Misplaced Pages corporation guidelines, almost all public corporations are notable, and Rio Alto is much larger in terms of market capitalization and net income than many other comparable companies that also have Misplaced Pages articles.
Given that it was my first article, I am not especially familiar with what makes a good Misplaced Pages article. I copied the template for the existing Iamgold (another Canadian gold miner) article and updated the information so as to be relevant to Rio Alto. I am happy to edit the article in whatever way necessary so as to be credible and not promotional. Please advise me as to what I should do in order to avoid deletion of the article. Thanks.
Discussion moved from subpage
Hapa Article Talk Page
I'm pretty new to Misplaced Pages editing, so perhaps I don't understand all the policies. Which policy does the section "Is Kip Fulbeck Trying to Enforce the California Usage?" violate? Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.101.70.234 (talk) 15:41, 6 October 2013 (UTC)
WP:OUTING. GregJackP Boomer! 15:46, 6 October 2013 (UTC)
Thank you. I will revise my response accordingly. How do you suggest I handle the fact that a single person who has a personal investment in a particular definition of the word hapa seems to be exerting his dominance? I'm not sure how to approach the matter. Perhaps that's just a point that should be left out due to the prohibition on outing? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.101.70.234 (talk) 15:59, 6 October 2013 (UTC)
I'm not really interested in being involved in the dispute, nor in giving advice, but you can ask at WP:TEAHOUSE. They always have people ready to help. Regards, GregJackP Boomer! 16:04, 6 October 2013 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
|
The Defender of the Wiki Barnstar |
| Thank you for taking care of the IP sock. - Slàn, Kathryn NicDhàna ♫♦♫ 19:39, 6 October 2013 (UTC) |
Your GA nomination of Colorado recall election of 2013
The article Colorado recall election of 2013 you nominated as a good article has failed 
; see Talk:Colorado recall election of 2013 for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sturmvogel 66 -- Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 17:52, 8 October 2013 (UTC)
Ex parte Crow Dog
Hi. Can you explain what ex parte means in the article and why this case is ex parte? Thanks. --(AfadsBad (talk) 22:34, 8 October 2013 (UTC))
- Ex parte is a legal term meaning from or by one party only. In old applications for writs of habeas corpus, the application was ex parte, in that the application for the writ was made by one side only. Both sides were heard before the prisoner would be freed. Here, the case was ex parte because Crow Dog was seeking a writ to avoid execution. GregJackP Boomer! 23:21, 8 October 2013 (UTC)
- There is nothing in the article that says that, and even linking to the article on ex parte doesn't help. Other people have expressed confusion on the article talk page. Could you add something to the article explaining the title of the action? It seems a curious omission for a FA, that a technical term would be used in an article title and never defined or at least Wikilinked. Thanks! --(AfadsBad (talk) 23:37, 8 October 2013 (UTC))
Disambiguation link notification for October 12
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Misplaced Pages appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Lone Wolf v. Hitchcock, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Lakota (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:50, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
DYK for Colorado recall election, 2013
 | On 13 October 2013, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Colorado recall election, 2013, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that the recall of Colorado Senate President John Morse was the first recall of a state official since recall was established in Colorado in 1912? You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
Gatoclass (talk) 00:51, 13 October 2013 (UTC)
Hudak
I've put her back into Colorado recall election, 2013, adding a phrase to make the relevance clear; I fear I was too quick on that one. Pinkbeast (talk) 14:30, 14 October 2013 (UTC)
Genocides in history
I've responded at length on the discussion page.
In turn, some of your remarks on the discussion page seemed aimed at Misplaced Pages:WikiBullying and WP:OWNership. Try to WP:AGF. Student7 (talk) 21:46, 15 October 2013 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.
SPI?
Worst SPI case I have yet to see, Niemti, genocide denier though he is, is most certainly none of those, give the man some credit for fucks sake, why on earth did you even file that? Darkness Shines (talk) 18:12, 16 October 2013 (UTC)
- Two other editors had the same idea, that socking was present, and although one of them had not connected it with Niemti, the other editor's first thought was Niemti. He also has a long and extensive history of socking. If you don't agree, OK, but there is good behavioral evidence and I'm sure that a checkuser would confirm it, if not quashed for other reasons. GregJackP Boomer! 18:18, 16 October 2013 (UTC)
- You will not get CU as you gave no behavioral proof at all, I will look into it. Darkness Shines (talk) 18:24, 16 October 2013 (UTC)
- I'll admit I'm not up on sock-hunting, it's never been a priority of mine. I would appreciate the help. GregJackP Boomer! 18:27, 16 October 2013 (UTC)
- You will not get CU as you gave no behavioral proof at all, I will look into it. Darkness Shines (talk) 18:24, 16 October 2013 (UTC)