| Revision as of 00:26, 1 May 2014 editEarwigBot (talk | contribs)Bots406,073 edits (Bot; Task 19): Notifying user regarding dispute resolution noticeboard case.← Previous edit | Revision as of 00:38, 1 May 2014 edit undoSjuttiosjuochfjorton (talk | contribs)152 edits →I invited you to a conflict dispute although you are doing a decent job moderating (we are getting nowhere with Chire): new sectionNext edit → | ||
| Line 39: | Line 39: | ||
| This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the ] regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult for editors. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help find a resolution. The thread is "]". | This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the ] regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult for editors. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help find a resolution. The thread is "]". | ||
| Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you!<!--Template:DRN-notice--> ] <sup>''] / ]''</sup> 00:26, 1 May 2014 (UTC) | Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you!<!--Template:DRN-notice--> ] <sup>''] / ]''</sup> 00:26, 1 May 2014 (UTC) | ||
| == I invited you to a conflict dispute although you are doing a decent job moderating (we are getting nowhere with Chire) == | |||
| I invited you to a conflict dispute although you are doing a decent job moderating (I am getting nowhere with Chire and it is clear that he has an agenda). I have asked for 3 more editors that will make an effort and do some serious background search. Also, editors should of course have RG accounts or have knowledge about the site] (]) 00:38, 1 May 2014 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 00:38, 1 May 2014
Welcome to my talk page. Please email me for anything that requires prompt attention.
Please click here to leave a message.
Your latest removal will be reverted on a daily basis (>24 hrs) until you have suggested a compromise or reworded my contribution. If you are interested we can also try a conflict dispute. https://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:DRN24_hrs)_until_you_have_s-2014-04-26T06:37:00.000Z">
Hi,
You are correct that Misplaced Pages is not supposed to be a "collection of indiscriminate facts". Neither is it supposed to be filled with opinionated quotes from personal blogs/websites, especially if the original statement is not entirely true. Beatrice Lugger's complaint was exaggerated and RG members are very unlikely to obtain higher scores unless having an extensive publication record. Her statement should not have been quoted in the first place.
- Importantly, her RG score of 10 is based 70% on her 4 publications (one of them has an impact factor > 30 and as a researcher you know this is very high). This makes her statement in the blog misleading and it should not be quoted on Misplaced Pages without supporting information. We are not in the business of spreading misinformation and Misplaced Pages has to be objective. We have to scrutinize information from personal blogs/websites, right?
The facts that I now have given can be obtained through the original reference, but I will also add a link to her RG profile. The section is now professionally written and does not single her out. Your removal will be reverted on a daily basis until you have suggested a compromise or engaged in a more meaningful discussion. Why do you remove without attempting to modify/check facts in the first place? As a researcher, you are certainly aware of the open peer-review process. No offense taken.
Regards, Sjuttiosjuochfjorton
- Hi. You must be new here. I'll respond about the content on the article talk page, and I'll respond about how to seek consensus on Misplaced Pages on your talk page. --BlueMoonlet (t/c) 06:37, 26 April 2014 (UTC)24_hrs)_until_you_have_s"> 24_hrs)_until_you_have_s">
Hello! There is a DR/N request you may have interest in.
This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Misplaced Pages:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult for editors. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help find a resolution. The thread is "ResearchGate". Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you! EarwigBot 00:26, 1 May 2014 (UTC)
I invited you to a conflict dispute although you are doing a decent job moderating (we are getting nowhere with Chire)
I invited you to a conflict dispute although you are doing a decent job moderating (I am getting nowhere with Chire and it is clear that he has an agenda). I have asked for 3 more editors that will make an effort and do some serious background search. Also, editors should of course have RG accounts or have knowledge about the siteSjuttiosjuochfjorton (talk) 00:38, 1 May 2014 (UTC)