Revision as of 18:34, 10 July 2006 editChuck Marean (talk | contribs)3,882 edits →24 hr block: responding to CrazyRougeian← Previous edit | Revision as of 18:47, 10 July 2006 edit undoChuck Marean (talk | contribs)3,882 edits I use the history page to archive what I'm not going to read again.Next edit → | ||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{User USA}} | |||
{{User USA}}] | |||
{{unblock|harassment by User:Crzrussian and others trying to get their way}} | |||
Welcome. If you're leaving a "direction", explain why the idea itself is good, and be polite. Remember whoever you are, I don't know if you know what you're talking about. | |||
---- | |||
== Deleting talk page == | |||
Chuck, as has been pointed out to you before , deleting warnings and relevant discussions from your talk page without archiving is ]. Having access to previous discussions benefits yourself as well as other editors, especially when the discussions are good faith efforts to help you better understand policy and make contributions to our encyclopedia. Here are links to three large chunks of your talk page that you have removed: , , . If you like, I can help you with ]. --] (]) 11:36, 10 July 2006 (UTC) | |||
Chuck, it is too bad that you think that my comments were threatening. I was following convention regarding users blanking warnings on your own user page by ('''<nowiki>{{</nowiki>Wr<nowiki>}}</nowiki>''') on your user page and restoring the warnings. I am happy to defer to mtz206's decision regarding the restoration of the warnings. Regardless, the warnings were put there to inform you of the need to cooperate with the community, as it has attempted to cooperate with you. --] 13:57, 10 July 2006 (UTC) | |||
==24 hr block== | |||
For Legal threats and removing warnings from your user talk page. | |||
{{blocked}} - <b>]</b><small> ]/]</small> 14:58, 10 July 2006 (UTC) | |||
:Please do not remove warnings from your talk page or replace them with offensive content. Removing or maliciously altering warnings from your talk page will not remove them from the page history. If you continue to remove or vandalize warnings from your talk page, you will lose your privilege of editing your talk page. Thanks. <!-- Template:Wr (second level warning) -->--] (]) 15:16, 10 July 2006 (UTC) | |||
::Blank it once more, and I will protect it. - <b>]</b><small> ]/]</small> 15:30, 10 July 2006 (UTC) | |||
:I think using the page history as an archive for things I'm not going to read again is cleaner than cluttering up my archive page, which I am using to hold useful information. Furthermore, using blocking to express your opinion is wrong. I have never vandalized anything and have never considered vandalizing anything. I think you kids should look the word vandalism up, since you don't seem to understand the word. The harazzment you've been doing on my talk page is considered by me to be vandalism. If I don't agree with you, maybe you're wrong. You can not get me to agree with you by force. If you're wrong you're wrong.--] 18:34, 10 July 2006 (UTC) | |||
{{Unblock reviewed|Harassment by User:Crzrussian,User:Avogadro94, User:Mtz206, & Misplaced Pages:Blocking policy|This looks like one of those silly situations which has got way beyond what it should be, I suggest you use the block period to cool off a little.}} | |||
--] 15:35, 10 July 2006 (UTC) |
Revision as of 18:47, 10 July 2006
This user lives in the United States of America. |
Chuck Marean (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
harassment by User:Crzrussian and others trying to get their wayNotes:
- In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
- Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.
If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:
{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=harassment by User:Crzrussian and others trying to get their way |3 = ~~~~}}
If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}}
with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.
{{unblock reviewed |1=harassment by User:Crzrussian and others trying to get their way |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}
If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here
with your rationale:
{{unblock reviewed |1=harassment by User:Crzrussian and others trying to get their way |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}