Revision as of 14:49, 4 November 2014 editTheSawTooth (talk | contribs)679 edits Warning: Violating the three-revert rule. (TW)← Previous edit | Revision as of 14:53, 4 November 2014 edit undoNikthestunned (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, File movers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers28,538 edits Undid revision 632423036 by TheSawTooth (talk) yeaaaaaa. no.Next edit → | ||
Line 76: | Line 76: | ||
thanks | thanks | ||
Ian. <small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 14:34, 4 November 2014 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | Ian. <small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 14:34, 4 November 2014 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | ||
== November 2014 == | |||
] Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an ]. To resolve the content dispute, instead of reverting please consider using the article's ] to work toward making a version that represents ] among editors. See ] for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant ] or seek ]. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary ]. | |||
'''Being involved in an edit war can result in your being ]'''—especially if you violate the ], which states that an editor must not perform more than three ] on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—'''even if you don't violate the three-revert rule'''—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.<!-- Template:uw-3rr --> ] (]) 14:49, 4 November 2014 (UTC) |
Revision as of 14:53, 4 November 2014
This is the talk page of Nikthestunned, formerly stoned. Click this to add a new thread.
If I left you a message on your talk page, please reply there and, should you wish, notify me here with a Talkback / TBT template.
If you left me a message here, I will reply here. I may notify you also, I may not!
TUSC token aef0036a5a71aee2a253fde0ae050c45
I am now the proud owner of a TUSC account!
Nomination of Daniel Hardcastle for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Daniel Hardcastle is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
You've got mail!
Hello, Nikthestunned. Please check your email; you've got mail!Message added 02:49, 11 October 2014 (UTC). It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.
Nikkimaria (talk) 02:49, 11 October 2014 (UTC)
Marbles
Well done. Over to you, though. I'm happily "unwatching" the article. (Not that it should matter, but my own "Youtube personality" tastes run more toward this.) If there's a fresh outbreak of inanity and you need help, let me know and I'll return (with machete and truncheon). -- Hoary (talk) 13:25, 13 October 2014 (UTC)
- No worries lol and thanks - though I have to say this is not to my taste either! I'm more into this³ sorta thing. Nikthestunned 13:53, 13 October 2014 (UTC)
- OK; and though they're not remotely vlogs, here are a couple more vids for your delectation. -- Hoary (talk) 23:15, 13 October 2014 (UTC)
Illinois Digital Npaper Collection
Hi NTS,
You commented on the page I was editing about the list I made and the new pages I was creating. I did change my username as per your suggestion (thank you). I am pretty new to editing[REDACTED] pages, so if you have any suggestions, please let me know. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Godgilla (talk • contribs) 13:19, 14 October 2014 (UTC)
And now, a rant
You complete prick. I put my list of things for someone to add to the Colin Bateman article on the CB TALK page. So why the hell have you removed it, you complete fool VinDibs (talk) 12:47, 24 October 2014 (UTC)
- Fuck off mate Nikthestunned 12:54, 24 October 2014 (UTC)
ERA
You are obviously acting on a 3rd parties behalf removing articles, references and anything positive about electronic recycling association.
Please provide your real name and a mailing address, our legal department has some documents for you to review — Preceding unsigned comment added by 198.17.96.199 (talk) 14:33, 3 November 2014 (UTC)
- No actually I just hate spam and promotion on Misplaced Pages, especially to a page cleaned up previously by an experienced editor. It's especially annoying when a company puts in a concerted effort to undermine the positive intentions of a small number of volunteers, and seeks to go about it without any consideration for the rules or without seeking help with your edits (and being fkin honest about who you are). My talk page history is full of plenty of people who've done this very thing, instead of the brute-force way you're going about it. Nicely done logging out to make the legal threat though, you do have some concept of the rules here it seems. Nikthestunned 17:26, 3 November 2014 (UTC)
Editing regarding Query
Hi, I am Ian, I was editing on Misplaced Pages article "electronic recycling association" few days before, Please can you tell how it's looking like an advertising. I was research on net and get some link, so want to add it because it is work for charity and if you think then i am doing any thing wrong then please make me correct, I will welcome your suggestion,but if you think that by mistake you doing anything wrong please undo the change,which you was doing, because i was doing lot's of hard work on it. thanks Ian. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ianjoy8311 (talk • contribs) 14:34, 4 November 2014 (UTC)