Revision as of 12:05, 27 December 2014 editAnastan (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers2,428 edits →27 December 2014← Previous edit | Revision as of 12:26, 27 December 2014 edit undoVanjagenije (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators130,640 editsNo edit summaryNext edit → | ||
Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
The same edit, acounts created just to vote on the same way '''<font face="Perpetua" size="3">] (])</font>''' 12:04, 27 December 2014 (UTC) | The same edit, acounts created just to vote on the same way '''<font face="Perpetua" size="3">] (])</font>''' 12:04, 27 December 2014 (UTC) | ||
======<span style="font-size:150%">Comments by other users</span>====== | |||
<small>''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See ].''</small> | |||
======<span style="font-size:150%">Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments</span>====== | |||
----<!--- All comments go ABOVE this line, please. --> | |||
=====<big>27 December 2014</big>===== | |||
{{SPI case status|CUrequest}} | |||
;Suspected sockpuppets | |||
* {{checkuser|1=99 editor}} | |||
<!-- You may duplicate the templates above ({{checkuser}} and {{checkIP}}) to list more accounts--> | |||
* <small>''Auto-generated every hour.''</small> | |||
* | |||
] has reverted other people's edits at ] numerous times (). He was warned no to do that again (). After that, a brand new user, ] is registered. One of the first edits made by this new user is to make exact the same revert that was previously made by Lindi 29 . He even uses similar edit summaries (they both use the word "ruin" in almost every edit summary). Here, Lindi29 uses "ruin": , , and here 99 editor uses the same word: . 99 editor even removed my post at ] that was directed towards Lindi29, and in which I explained him to stop reverting edits . Also, one of the first edits made by 99 editor is to vote "STRONG support" at ], the same way as Lindi29 voted before. They both display low level of English language knowledge. ] (]) 12:26, 27 December 2014 (UTC) | |||
======<span style="font-size:150%">Comments by other users</span>====== | ======<span style="font-size:150%">Comments by other users</span>====== |
Revision as of 12:26, 27 December 2014
Lindi29
Lindi29 (talk · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
Populated account categories: confirmed
For archived investigations, see Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations/Lindi29/Archive.
27 December 2014
– A user has requested CheckUser. An SPI clerk will shortly look at the case and endorse or decline the request.
- Suspected sockpuppets
- KingMax7 (talk · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- 99 editor (talk · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Let's keep it neutral (talk · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- 67.70.35.44 (talk · tag · contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · proxy check · block user · spi block · block log · cross-wiki contribs · CheckUser (log))
- User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
- Editor interaction utility
Everything very simple at https://en.wikipedia.org/Talk:Kosovo_Polje#Proposed_move
The same edit, acounts created just to vote on the same way Ąnαșταη (ταlκ) 12:04, 27 December 2014 (UTC)
Comments by other users
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
27 December 2014
– A user has requested CheckUser. An SPI clerk will shortly look at the case and endorse or decline the request.
- Suspected sockpuppets
- 99 editor (talk · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
- Editor interaction utility
User:Lindi29 has reverted other people's edits at Peć numerous times (). He was warned no to do that again (). After that, a brand new user, User:99 editor is registered. One of the first edits made by this new user is to make exact the same revert that was previously made by Lindi 29 . He even uses similar edit summaries (they both use the word "ruin" in almost every edit summary). Here, Lindi29 uses "ruin": , , and here 99 editor uses the same word: . 99 editor even removed my post at Talk:Peć that was directed towards Lindi29, and in which I explained him to stop reverting edits . Also, one of the first edits made by 99 editor is to vote "STRONG support" at Talk:Kosovo Polje#Proposed move, the same way as Lindi29 voted before. They both display low level of English language knowledge. Vanjagenije (talk) 12:26, 27 December 2014 (UTC)
Comments by other users
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
Categories: