Misplaced Pages

:Sockpuppet investigations/Lindi29: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from[REDACTED] with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 12:05, 27 December 2014 editAnastan (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers2,428 edits 27 December 2014← Previous edit Revision as of 12:26, 27 December 2014 edit undoVanjagenije (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators130,640 editsNo edit summaryNext edit →
Line 19: Line 19:


The same edit, acounts created just to vote on the same way '''<font face="Perpetua" size="3">] (])</font>''' 12:04, 27 December 2014 (UTC) The same edit, acounts created just to vote on the same way '''<font face="Perpetua" size="3">] (])</font>''' 12:04, 27 December 2014 (UTC)

======<span style="font-size:150%">Comments by other users</span>======
<small>''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See ].''</small>


======<span style="font-size:150%">Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments</span>======


----<!--- All comments go ABOVE this line, please. -->


=====<big>27 December 2014</big>=====
{{SPI case status|CUrequest}}

;Suspected sockpuppets

* {{checkuser|1=99 editor}}


<!-- You may duplicate the templates above ({{checkuser}} and {{checkIP}}) to list more accounts-->
* <small>''Auto-generated every hour.''</small>
*

] has reverted other people's edits at ] numerous times (). He was warned no to do that again (). After that, a brand new user, ] is registered. One of the first edits made by this new user is to make exact the same revert that was previously made by Lindi 29 . He even uses similar edit summaries (they both use the word "ruin" in almost every edit summary). Here, Lindi29 uses "ruin": , , and here 99 editor uses the same word: . 99 editor even removed my post at ] that was directed towards Lindi29, and in which I explained him to stop reverting edits . Also, one of the first edits made by 99 editor is to vote "STRONG support" at ], the same way as Lindi29 voted before. They both display low level of English language knowledge. ] (]) 12:26, 27 December 2014 (UTC)


======<span style="font-size:150%">Comments by other users</span>====== ======<span style="font-size:150%">Comments by other users</span>======

Revision as of 12:26, 27 December 2014


Lindi29

Lindi29 (talk · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log· investigate · cuwiki)

Populated account categories: confirmed

For archived investigations, see Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations/Lindi29/Archive.


27 December 2014

– A user has requested CheckUser. An SPI clerk will shortly look at the case and endorse or decline the request.

Suspected sockpuppets

Everything very simple at https://en.wikipedia.org/Talk:Kosovo_Polje#Proposed_move

The same edit, acounts created just to vote on the same way Ąnαșταη (ταlκ) 12:04, 27 December 2014 (UTC)

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments


27 December 2014

– A user has requested CheckUser. An SPI clerk will shortly look at the case and endorse or decline the request.

Suspected sockpuppets


User:Lindi29 has reverted other people's edits at Peć numerous times (). He was warned no to do that again (). After that, a brand new user, User:99 editor is registered. One of the first edits made by this new user is to make exact the same revert that was previously made by Lindi 29 . He even uses similar edit summaries (they both use the word "ruin" in almost every edit summary). Here, Lindi29 uses "ruin": , , and here 99 editor uses the same word: . 99 editor even removed my post at Talk:Peć that was directed towards Lindi29, and in which I explained him to stop reverting edits . Also, one of the first edits made by 99 editor is to vote "STRONG support" at Talk:Kosovo Polje#Proposed move, the same way as Lindi29 voted before. They both display low level of English language knowledge. Vanjagenije (talk) 12:26, 27 December 2014 (UTC)

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

Categories:
Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations/Lindi29: Difference between revisions Add topic