| Revision as of 09:56, 18 July 2006 editMONGO (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, File movers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers76,644 edits →ED Page Link: what for?← Previous edit | Revision as of 10:01, 18 July 2006 edit undoIicatsii (talk | contribs)565 editsm →ED Page LinkNext edit → | ||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
| Seeing as the main page is off limits here, would it be fairer to insert a link to one of their articles that’s a little less controversial (and indeed funnier) like the Noone page , as having links to rival sites in the article and none to ED seems a little unfair. ~ ] 09:53, 18 July 2006 (UTC) | Seeing as the main page is off limits here, would it be fairer to insert a link to one of their articles that’s a little less controversial (and indeed funnier) like the Noone page , as having links to rival sites in the article and none to ED seems a little unfair. ~ ] 09:53, 18 July 2006 (UTC) | ||
| :What for?--] 09:56, 18 July 2006 (UTC) | :What for?--] 09:56, 18 July 2006 (UTC) | ||
| ::It stands unbalanced at the moment, what with all the links to “rival” sites giving their opinions of ED. Surely an external link to ED that we can all agree on will give this article the balance it needs. ~ ] 10:01, 18 July 2006 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 10:01, 18 July 2006
 | This article was nominated for deletion on 2 Jun 2005. The result of the discussion was keep. |
| This article was nominated for deletion on 24 March 2006. The result of the discussion was no consensus. |
Archives: Archive 1 Archive 2 Archive 3 Archive 4
ED Page Link
Seeing as the main page is off limits here, would it be fairer to insert a link to one of their articles that’s a little less controversial (and indeed funnier) like the Noone page , as having links to rival sites in the article and none to ED seems a little unfair. ~ IICATSII 09:53, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
- What for?--MONGO 09:56, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
- It stands unbalanced at the moment, what with all the links to “rival” sites giving their opinions of ED. Surely an external link to ED that we can all agree on will give this article the balance it needs. ~ IICATSII 10:01, 18 July 2006 (UTC)