User talk:J. Johnson: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively ← Previous edit Next edit →Content deleted Content addedVisual WikitextInline

Revision as of 20:49, 31 July 2015 editJ. Johnson (talk \| contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, IP block exemptions19,647 edits →Can't see the point: Notice to Pete (User:Skyring) to stay off my talk page← Previous edit		Revision as of 04:41, 6 October 2015 edit undoCoolmarc (talk \| contribs)Extended confirmed users14,563 edits →Question: new sectionNext edit →
Line 71:		Line 71:
	== Can't see the point ==		== Can't see the point ==
	Pete: your delusions tiresome, and your general incivility unwelcome. Please do not waste any more space ''here'' on such puerile comments. In short: stay off my talk page. ~ ] (]) 20:47, 31 July 2015 (UTC)		Pete: your delusions tiresome, and your general incivility unwelcome. Please do not waste any more space ''here'' on such puerile comments. In short: stay off my talk page. ~ ] (]) 20:47, 31 July 2015 (UTC)

			== Question ==

			Hello. I have just read through the discussion at the CS1 talk page and I must say I've become very confused. If I were to cite sources such as ] or ] for example which are websites that should not be in italics, would I be correct in placing them in the {{TQ\|publisher}} parameter instead of the {{TQ\|website}} to omit the italics? Or is this wrong? Or is there another way to go about this! I was recently told while reviewing ] that replacing "website" with "publisher" to omit italics contaminates metadata. I'm so confused. Please could you clarify. Thanks. <b><font face="tahoma" color="#000000">]</font><font face="tahoma" color="#00BFFF">]</font></b> 04:41, 6 October 2015 (UTC)

Revision as of 04:41, 6 October 2015

Getting started
A tutorial • Our five pillars • Getting mentored How to: edit a page • upload and use images
Getting help
Frequently asked questions • Tips Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention
Policies and guidelines
Neutral point of view • No original research Verifiability • Reliable sources • Citing sources What Misplaced Pages is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The community
Build consensus • Resolve disputes Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • No legal threats Community Portal • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists
Writing articles
Be bold in editing • Develop an article The perfect article • Manual of style Stubs • Categories • Disambiguation Pages needing attention • Peer review
Miscellaneous
User name • User pages • Talk pages Clean up: General - Spam - Vandalism Join a WikiProject • Translation Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

A handy collection of useful links.

Canonical IPCC citations.

The canonical forms for citing the IPCC documents are at:

SAR.
TAR.
AR4.
AR5.

Ask if you have questions or need assistance.

Can't see the point

Pete: your delusions tiresome, and your general incivility unwelcome. Please do not waste any more space here on such puerile comments. In short: stay off my talk page. ~ J. Johnson (JJ) (talk) 20:47, 31 July 2015 (UTC)

Question

Hello. I have just read through the discussion at the CS1 talk page and I must say I've become very confused. If I were to cite sources such as Amazon.com or Official Charts Company for example which are websites that should not be in italics, would I be correct in placing them in the publisher parameter instead of the website to omit the italics? Or is this wrong? Or is there another way to go about this! I was recently told while reviewing Talk:Photograph (Ed Sheeran song)/GA1 that replacing "website" with "publisher" to omit italics contaminates metadata. I'm so confused. Please could you clarify. Thanks. CoolMarc 04:41, 6 October 2015 (UTC)